Leaderboard

@LJBis a good dude.

The ***duck**er drinks wine during his podcast'...

Garland and the FBI. Liars Lie. Crime statistics: FBI statistics vs Victim Reports. Correlated in the past. Now . . . Garland says all is getting better. Victims being more victimized! “What you find is that these two measures, prior to 2020, generally moved along together, but, since 2020, they’ve moved in opposite directions in each year, often by very large amounts,” he added. “If you take 2022, which is the last complete data that we have final data for both of those two measures, while the FBI showed a 2 percent drop in reported violent crime, the National Crime Victimization data showed a 42 percent increase in violent crime.” Indeed, in 2021, the FBI reported 387 violent crimes per 100,000 people. The figure dropped to 380.7 per 100,000 people in 2022. Yet, the National Crime Victimization survey found that reports of violent crimes increased 42 percent, from 16.5 incidents per 1,000 people in 2021 to 23.5 per 1,000 people in 2022.

A better explanation of the errant claim that komrade kamela supports building the border wall: https://www.thethinkingconservative.com/no-kamala-harris-hasnt-promised-to-build-a-border-wall/ “Another canard in the same Axios article is the claim that Trump “ordered his allies to kill” the Senate Border Act, “fearing it would help Democrats in the November elections.” That common allegation is derived from a post that Trump made on Truth Social in which he stated, “This Bill is a great gift to the Democrats, and a Death Wish for The Republican Party.” Contradicting the Democrat and media spin that Trump opposes the bill because he doesn’t want the border crisis fixed before the election, Trump wrote in the very same post that the bill must be defeated because it: “only gives Shutdown Authority after 5000 Encounters a day, when we already have the right to CLOSE THE BORDER NOW, which must be done.” “takes the HORRIBLE JOB the Democrats have done on Immigration and the Border, absolves them, and puts it all squarely on the shoulders of Republicans.” In summary, the claim that Kamala Harris promised to build a border wall has no basis in reality and bolsters counterfactual propaganda that Democrats are strong on border security. Meanwhile, Democrats universally opposed a strong border bill, and objective measures show that the border has been far less secure under Biden and Harris than ever recorded in the nation’s history. James D. Agresti is the president of Just Facts, a research and educational institute dedicated to publishing facts about public policies and teaching research skills.“

It's probably a bit of both. The US is ahead of just about everyone else in women's athletics simply because there have been more opportunities for longer. We also do have a pretty robust youth system, as imperfect as it is. Donovan does have a point, though he is painting with a broad brush. I basically live in the (girls) club soccer world these days and there certainly are a number of soccer clubs who basically sell the idea of winning to parents. Those clubs typically teach their kids at a young age how to "win" the game. For those familiar with soccer, that basically means they teach their players how to sit in a low block, be physical, and send long balls to the other side. It's tough for anyone to score against a low block, much less 8-9-10 year-olds or any youth player. So the club "wins" the game or the tournament. The kids get a medal. The parents get to post on social media about how great their kid is....but those kids don't learn how to play. There are clubs who approach things differently, but they are definitely in the minority. They'll focus on developing technical ability at a young age and implement tactics, formation, etc., as the players get older and more physically mature. You might see these teams lose a bunch in the younger years, but the tide starts to switch at older age groups because they've learned how to play and can think about the game and not simply how to pass from A-to-B-to-C. They teach technique, concepts, and ideas to the young kids and it tends to pay off later. The other aspect of all of this is financial. It's expensive to play in these clubs, regardless of which version you find yourself in. But in my experience and to my knowledge, the cost aspect doesn't exclude as many kids as some want you to believe. There are plenty of scholarship/funding sources or flat-our fee waivers for players who otherwise wouldn't be able to afford to play at a club. There are scouts for the clubs who recruit promising players. It's certainly not a perfect structure for men's or women's soccer, but changing the most prevalent approach is a pretty tall task because "winning" right now is very appealing and patience, as virtuous as it is, seems to be in short supply. Donovan's point about the rate of development for young US players as a whole is well made. I don't think there's much argument there. There's a lot to unpack, but that's a Reader's Digest version from my point of view.

Much has been written on here about the American approach to youth development in wrestling, and what we do wrong in our approach. I came across this quote from Landon Donovan (former US Soccer player) about youth development of soccer in the US. His words are eerily similar to criticisms I’ve seen of wrestling voiced by guys like Askren, Hrovat etc. It brings up the idea that our problem to youth development in sports here is not really sport specific, but more of a cultural problem. “My kids are in youth soccer. I see youth soccer environments. It’s a disaster. An absolute disaster.” “The kids are developing but nowhere near the rate they could be. It’s wasteful. It’s a cultural problem in America.” “This is my opinion. One thing amazing about America is we want to win everything and be the best at everything. The problem is that trickles down to a six-year-old’s soccer games.” “The emphasis on a six-year-old should be getting better, not winning soccer games. There are coaches I hear say ‘this coach I’m coaching next week is my arch nemesis. We have to win that game.' And I'm thinking what the hell is wrong with you? You're coaching seven-year-olds, that's not what this is about." "Or they say this tournament is very important so we have to win and five out of 10 players might not play as much. It's ridiculous, absolutely ridiculous." "The incentive structure is totally backwards. We will never compete at that level unless we get that part right."

he's the senior rep for Japan at worlds in October

Japan keeps impressing, Blaze got beat decisively in that match.

Eh, I have less of a problem with his actual wrestling tactics vs the guys who lay on the mat for several minutes. See: Mirasola’s semi. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

OSU 125 - Kilkeary 133 - Bouzakis 141 - Mendez 149 - D'Emillio 157- Gallagher 165 - Hepner 174 - Welsh/Kharch 184 - Rogotzke/Welsh 197 - Geog/Shumate 285 - Feldman I like McCrone, I believe Kilkeary gets the early starts and McCrone has to win the spot back. Hepner starts. I can't see Sasso at 65 (which has been mentioned) or Kharch at 84. Maybe Rogotzke RS's and Welsh goes 84? Geog / Shumate is a push for me. 65 to 97 depends on too many things to be sure of anything...

I thought this was going to be about Japanese Men’s Freestyle. With their Olympic and U20 performances, it looks like they could be top team contenders in both M and W for some time.

There might be one hour of one day that border crossings are ZERO!

That pesky Constitution. It keeps getting in the way of people who know they are smarter than everyone else enacting their plans to make everyone else do what they want. I see the Constitution as a straightjacket for the midwits. It stops them from hurting others and themselves. And they are pissed off about it!

The guy makes me cringe...but I should cut him a little slack on this subject because i think its his profession it seems like he's good at it. His wrestling insights are pyles level unfortunately...but he still gets way better interviews than him.

Mirasola straight robbed in the semis. Barr and Kueter looked like animals.

Barr at 197 for a year is looking more and more like actual points on the board at NCAAs. He smashed his way to the U20 86kg finals today. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Cael and Jordan Burroughs

Basch has sources from all “his guys” that go to BBQ’s at his house

Yes for some reason the 92kg bracket wasn’t there so he was listed as not in the tournament it was weird

I’m in technology sales. I know how it is my friend. Post deal Incentivization is hard.

She might just be smarter than your average rock lobster.

Well my opinion is that we did pretty well and I think we are improving somewhat.

Orange ... unless thats not an option in which case its orange.

The friendship shall remain as untarnished as the point I have made

Maybe this: https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/41136586/smu-football-acc-death-penalty-return-2024

I have a bias that this topic was created because of someone's bias. When the photos of Trump laying the wreath at Arlington first hit X... my train of thought was Wow that looks respectful by Trump Why is Trump showing respect but Biden is and has not? This was savvy by Trump to counter the suckers and losers hoax, but also this is just for show. How interesting that he was invited by the families; so it isn't just for show. (but its still partly for show) Then the media hit Trump and Harris hit Trump to paint him in a bad light. Kamala you idiot. You should not have said anything at all. Media you idiots. Trump looks like he is doing a good deed and there you go again with negative spin. Then this intermatwrestle topic was created. How do we get people to think critically. Then more of the families show their support for Trump and bash Harris/Biden. Kamala and Media - you idiots. Then intermatwrestle members poking about law. everywere there is short-sighted blinkered buffoons and tunnel-visioned nincompoops with the TDS virus...

Who said I wasn't biased? Everybody has biases, me included. That's called "human experience." When people pretend they don't have biases about well-known topics they're actively discussing, that's when you know their full of crap.

Yeah he's definitely a bust. Him beating Ashnault as a 17 year old is the cherry on top of his bust cake.

Population is their advantage, a strong history of traditional wrestling is another. But their facilities, developmental programs, and access to high quality training from a young age is a detriment. I'd say they are doing very well.

Dogs are great

He isn't actually banned. It is a choice thing. What is funny, is once you get to know him, which I have also noticed this with the 95%+ of you other gents that come off as abrasive turdbiscuits, he is actually about as swell as they come with morals and ethics that are above reproach. For all accounts that should matter, he is top notch.

DOJ is as dirty as there is in government right now. mspart

I'll never forgive SDSU for stealing glazier...

its iowa...its always iowa

Growth was always prioritized to me above winning in wrestling. When I was cheesing a headlock in third grade, and continually beating guys with it, my coach forbade me to do it so I could expand my offense. I can only really speak to my own personal anecdotes though, and am not sure about what the national landscape would like like in that regard.

how long have you had the illusion that you are human?

i said he was an idiot. you say he is a criminal and that is proof he is an idiot. i disagree. man you really dont know much

the 12 cranial nerves, which one are you having trouble with

RL, Here are 3 of the 34 counts against Trump . THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK, by this indictment, accuses the defendant of the crime of FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE, in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows: The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about February 14, 2017, with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an invoice from Michael Cohen dated February 14, 2017, marked as a record of the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization. SECOND COUNT: AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the defendant of the crime of FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE, in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows: The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about February 14, 2017, with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an entry in the Detail General Ledger for the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust, bearing voucher number 842457, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization. THIRD COUNT: AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the defendant of the crime of FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE, in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows: The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about February 14, 2017, with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an entry in the Detail General Ledger for the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust, bearing voucher number 842460, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization. The other 31 counts read similarly. In order to secure a felony conviction, Trump had to falsify records AND something else. Based on these indictment counts, what did Trump do to make these felony items? Please be specific. If you don't want to do that, please be specific on what the jury found to make these felony items. I submit to you that the indictment does not specificly allege any action that Trump took to make these felonies. When does that ever happen? Amendment 6 of the Constitution states: In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense. With those indictments, can you honestly say Trump was informed of the nature and cause of the accusation? Of course you will say so, but if you are being honest, you cannot say that. What specifically does the indictment say he did? It doesn't. And that is the fact. mspart

... but but ... there's 34 ...

Yes - it is 34 felonies. I don't know who you're trying to convince that it is otherwise. But if they're reading here... stop believe ionel's BS. Each of the 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree, a class E felony, carries a maximum sentence of up to four years in prison. The judge could decide to impose the sentences consecutively or simultaneously. However, under New York law, 20 years is the maximum prison time that Trump could get — not 187 years, as Trump falsely claimed in his May 31 remarks. Ionel, it may be time to take your clown hat off and put on your thinking cap. You're posts are an embarrassment.