Caveira

You already lost your main argument. Don’t try to change the topic.

Darkest hour is boss. I’ll look at the professional. Thanks.

No spoilers. It’s like 7 years pre civil war. A war in Utah. Brigham young … the us army…. An Indian tribe (a very specific one) …. It’s very fascinating. your turn what should I watch of gary oldman? Always looking for cool new stuff edit: I have not seen overly religious stuff out of Brigham …. But I’m not done so I honestly don’t know where it’s going per se …..

Not to change topics. Start watching American Primeval? (Netflix)

Boss. A link was posted.

The article says 66% boss

Read this slowly the elected official is entitled to jack shyte nothing. His ask is bubkus. The police can lie to him all day and twice on Sunday. The only person that matters is the person named in the warrant. read it twice before posting. Have a cheese sandwich. Read it one more time. Then post your reaction. Put a shyte emoji on this response when you’re done with the sandwich. Use artisan cheese. It’s better.

Man. It’s 66 now lol https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/majority-americans-support-deporting-immigrants-who-are-us-illegally

Stop debating facts and resort to name calling when you realize you aren’t right. booooot lickers!!!!!!!! i thought y’all wanted due process. Now your getting it and booooooottttttt licker lol.

“Cheese Sandwich” Scenario & Arrest Law Let’s say federal officers are arresting “illegal alien A” and a local senator storms in, demanding to see the warrant. The officers wave a literal cheese sandwich at him and say, “Here—here’s your warrant!” Meanwhile, they proceed to arrest “illegal alien A”, who actually is named in the real warrant. How does the law view that? Who has the right to the warrant? Only the person named in the warrant (here, “illegal alien A”) has the legal right to: Be informed of the existence of a warrant and the offense, and See the physical warrant when requested A random bystander—even a senator—has no legal standing to demand or view it . Lying to the senator / waving a cheese sandwich The warrant belongs to Illegal alien A; it doesn’t need to be shown to anyone else. Officers aren’t obliged to satisfy the senator’s demand, nor validate his demand with anything real. Waving a cheese sandwich instead of a warrant is not legally required or disallowed—but it plays no role in complying with the law. Could that be illegal? Officers can deceive bystanders — but twisting the truth about having a warrant or to manipulate consent can lead to Fourth Amendment violations (e.g., Bumper v. North Carolina, Hadley v. Williams) Here, they aren’t lying to person A—they’re simply not responding to the senator’s non-existent legal right. Is there any potential harm? The arrest itself is lawful so long as the real warrant is valid and person A is properly informed . Deceiving the senator doesn’t void the arrest or its legality. However, if they had used the sandwich trick to enter a home or gain consent, that could trigger suppression of evidence—especially if it was used to bypass legal protections .

It says above. Several times. They’re not required to show some random dude anything. They could have waved a cheese sandwich in his face. I don’t think that it is relevant.

62% of all Americans want every single illegal alien deported. Seems like you can’t handle it happening And want to resist every single attempt. i would have preferred that rando elected guy get charged too. That would be the right thing to do imo.

Another good one: No — even if that random dude is a U.S. Senator, federal agents aren’t required to show or provide the warrant to him, unless he is the subject of that warrant. Here's why: Federal Rule 4 — Who Gets the Warrant? Rule 4(c)(3)(A) clearly states officers must inform the defendant that a warrant exists and specify the offense. If the defendant requests to see the physical warrant, it must be shown to that person “as soon as possible”  The rule does not require officers to present the warrant to bystanders, even if they’re public figures like senators .

Here is a good one: Legal Framework: Federal Rule 4 (Arrest Warrants) Rule 4(c)(3)(A) states that upon arrest, an officer must: Inform the defendant that a warrant exists and specify the offense, and Show the physical warrant to the defendant, at the defendant’s request, as soon as practicable — not to anyone else