Jump to content

Wrestleknownothing

Members
  • Posts

    9,834
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    131

Wrestleknownothing last won the day on April 23

Wrestleknownothing had the most liked content!

1 Follower

Recent Profile Visitors

60,203 profile views

Wrestleknownothing's Achievements

Big Brain

Big Brain (14/14)

  • One Year In
  • Posting Machine Rare
  • One Month Later
  • Very Popular
  • Week One Done

Recent Badges

6.8k

Reputation

  1. Part of Trump's strategy is to deal in a high volume of lies to keep everyone chasing their tails while he is on to the next set of lies. Did he every get the cat and dog crisis in Ohio taken care of? He must have since he doesn't bring it up anymore.
  2. In addition to an unnecessary plane that needs to be retrofit at tax payer expense, now Kristi Noem, who is too stupid to know what habeus corpus is, wants to spend $40 million for a new jet for her. And where is DOGE?
  3. 177 points is pretty strong evidence against their worst season. You are only focused on ceilings and ignoring that floors raised significantly more than ceilings fell.
  4. Those are two different time frames. Yields are basically unchanged since the Moody's downgrade.
  5. I will ask the question I have not seen asked. Does it matter that Moody's downgraded the US to Aa1? After all they are the third of three major rating agencies to do this, and the first one did it 14 years ago. And it is not like it affects anyone's ability to hold US government debt. And with the ability to print money it is not like a default is likely either (though for brinksmanship reasons it is sometimes threatened). So what does it really matter? If your answer is that it will make the cost of borrowing higher, that isn't true either. In 2011 interest rates on treasuries went down after S&P downgraded. If you are a corporate issuer it would be true, but the official rating of US government debt does not have any meaningful impact on demand for the securities, so rates are not affected by the rating. For sovereign credits ratings are mostly a trailing indicator. Moody's is just confirming what we all already know. Debt is too high, and the latest budget proposal only adds to the problem.
  6. JC's take would have been Thursday. My take was that the most likely outcome was 3 champions (29.1%), followed closely by 2 champions (27.7%), then 4 (17.9%), 1 (14.9%). Anyone who thought PSU could have 9 in the finals was, by definition, not being realistic. They were being optimistic. So 6 guys on the backside Saturday (aka wrestling for third through eighth) would fit perfectly. The only way you can argue "underperform" is if everything went perfectly for 10 guys. It just never happens that way.
  7. That ignores a whole lot of stuff. In spite of the fact that their average finish was third....read that again....their average finish was third.....across ten guys, it is only "underperformance" because their average seed was 2.6 AND they could do no better than finish first in any weight. I will go out on a limb here and say that no team will ever have an average seed of 2.6 or better AND outperform that seed with six or more wrestlers. The highest average seed to ever outperform their seed is 2024 PSU which was seeded 4.0 on average and finished 3.6 on average. Of course, to do that they needed the prohibitive favorite to get injured, forfeit two matches, and get seeded 9th so that there were 8 potential slots of improvement. Let's say Starocci was seeded first instead. Then they would have had an average seed of 3.2 and an average finish of 3.6 for an identical -0.4 performance as 2025.
  8. Now I have to learn the flags? Come on UWW.
  9. The other thing that was different from past years was PSU's average seeds. No team has ever had an average seed of 2.6 before PSU did this year. Add to that that they had 10 wrestlers seeded that high and that makes it nearly impossible to outperform the average seed. As far as past years, PSU has underperformed their seed in 6 of the 15 seasons (40%) since Sanderson took over.
  10. The circles on college mats are between 32 and 42 feet in diameter. Freestyle mats are 9 meters (29.5 feet), a seven meter central wrestling area and a 1 meter passivity zone all around. Seems especially weird (and amateurish) because there is no passivity zone on a college mat, but you are right, the videos I saw are on college mats.
  11. You added quotes about an entirely different topic. Not such a great memory after all.
  12. Just stop making stuff up then claiming that you remember "y'all" said it.
  13. What you know, but will not say, is that every single one of those quotes is about college wrestling. And if you are trying to say there is no way Starocci is in the conversation about the Mr. Rushmore of college wreatling, then you are a fool. Still no one has every said Starocci is on the Mt. Rushmore of wrestling.
  14. Why do you always feel the need yo do this? Can you name a single person on this board who has Starocci on the Mt. Rushmore of wrestling? You say you can remember this so I am sure this won't be challenging for you, right?
  15. Kentucky turns its athletic department into an LLC in anticipation of the House Settlement being approved: https://swimswam.com/university-of-kentucky-transitions-athletic-department-into-an-llc-ahead-of-house-settlement/ And of course, it is a swimming publication bringing us the news.
×
×
  • Create New...