Wrestleknownothing

Funny you should mention that. I just started looking at it. I should have something this afternoon.

Mesenbrink is a straight up runner-up. But he appreciates your vote of confidence. I did this at the start of the season detailing returning points and their source. Since it is returning I only detail this year's transfers (so no Kerkvliet, Mesenbrink, Caliendo, etc.). And no Ferrari since he has not scored in a few years.

Who is that a question for and is it in reference to anything in particular?

Reece Witcraft and Kaleb Henson in the poll even though they do not technically qualify. Their last match was 12/19. The portal for naming starters closed 1/19. That's 31 days since they last wrestled. There is a requirement to have wrestled at least once in the last 30 days.

Missing from the poll due to the 8 bout minimum: Carson Kharchla #6 at 174 Andrew Alirez #2 at 141 Dylan Cedeno #20 at 141 Ryan Crookham #1 at 133 Gable Steveson #1 at 285

And right now he is losing that argument worse than offthemat

Fascinating

It was covered in the first quote. You are just choosing to ignore it. "Every citizen or subject of another country, while domiciled here, is within the allegiance and the protection, and consequently subject to the jurisdiction, of the United States." There is a federal judge who agrees with me. "I've been on the bench for over four decades. I can't remember another case where the question presented is as clear as this one. This is a blatantly unconstitutional order," Coughenour said of Trump's policy. "I am having trouble understanding how a member of the bar could state unequivocally that this order is constitutional," the judge told a U.S. Justice Department lawyer defending Trump's order. "It just boggles my mind."

Because Native Americans were always treated as "other" whose only path to citizenship was naturalization. They were one of one. All part of the troubled history with Native Americans.

The Supreme Court made it clear that the imigration status of the parents is irrelevant when it comes to birthright citizenship. But the real issue is not this at all. The real issue is whether a President can use an executive order to violate The Constitution. I would be shocked if the Supreme Court would hold that a President can change their decisions unilaterally. That is, and should remain, the province of dictators, not Presidents.

Forget about scholars. The exact words from the Supreme Court directly address this situation and Eastman is just plain wrong.

That is from 1898 when the question was settled definitively. The Court has had no reason to answer the question again that they had already answered.

pick almost any number. They are very volatile.

You need to be able to decipher whatever blockchain they are on to do that, so pretty much no.