Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 07/16/2025 in all areas
-
9 points
-
3 points
-
3 points
-
3 points
-
Kenny vs Mills @126 might be my match of the tournament so far3 points
-
there is no genuine pyles takes, its all self aware all the time...like a boring patrick bateman.2 points
-
I remember how John Smith looked like a skinny high school kid his whole career. Not that Jax Forrest is even close to there yet.2 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
Not guilty of what? He hasn't been charged with anything. The police are not pursuing the theft case anymore, no way is anyone charging a wrestler for a butt drag, bullying isn't a crime. The only thing he can be charged with that has been publicly alleged is the rape and the victims haven't gone public so it seem unlikely they want a trial.2 points
-
I see approximately 0.1% chance that any of the allegations that were published in the Collegian article ever see the inside of a court room. That doesn’t mean they definitely didn’t happen though. If we’re mostly just talking about him possibly being let go from NLWC, they are still free to do that.2 points
-
Kellen Wolbert, WI over Dean Anderson, AZ (TF 16-3 (4:06)) Rocklin Zinkin, CA over Joseph Uhorchuk, TN (Dec 12-6)2 points
-
Idk if anyone is a lock nowadays with all the talent but I personally feel confident at least 3 will be ncaa champ and all 4 will be 4x AA2 points
-
I think he was mirroring JD's stance that was way on the other end of the spectrum where I felt like he was kind of diminishing what Jax accomplished. It was like a tug of war trying to find balance. I think as mentioned above Kozak had the most appropriate perspective.2 points
-
Burroughs turned 38 last week. But anyway.. the lowest weights have much shorter windows of success than middle to upper weights. I agree 26 isn't old, but who was the last world champion at 57kg/61kg that was 30 years old?2 points
-
https://www.nbcsports.com/olympics/news/jax-forrest-wrestling-world-championships-2025 Nice to see some wrestling get some attention from NBC2 points
-
I truly don't understand what they are doing. There must be death threats from some pretty important people or something for neither the Biden nor Trump regime to release the files. I am tired of the charade. Release the files or resign.2 points
-
Listening to Monday's FRL, CP tried to argue against whether or not Vito's health was a factor in the result of Jax's win over Vito. I understand that he doesn't want to diminish Jax's win, but it seems like an absolutely egregious stance to pretend like Vito's health wasn't a key factor in how the match played out. I think it's fair to say that we don't know what happens between a full strength Vito against Jax.. but I can't imagine going on the podcast and pretending like Jax's win was against even a close to top strength Vito. I am typically a CP apologist, but I was genuinely disappointed and annoyed by the lack of acknowledgement that Vito was clearly hampered. 6:50-9:00 is the crux of the conversation.1 point
-
I think in most years he would be the clear 1 guy but his matches with Seidel and dropping one to Ignacio makes me feel like he is not quite as separated and as advanced as his peers mentioned. That being said I think he could AA next year if he went for Cornell.1 point
-
1 point
-
Y’all are sleeping on Anthony Knox he’s beaten Bassett and might end up with a better folk career then anyone listed1 point
-
1 point
-
there are no weight classes in tennis. there's 10 ish headliners in tennis. you get them, and you got yourself an event. in wrestling you get 10 headliners against bums you still aint got nothing.1 point
-
So the guy who literally didn’t release it. Has a better shot of releasing it in your mind. Tell me you have tds without telling me you have tds. I’ll rephrase the question. two football games. rb1 plays the titans. Scores 0 TDs. After 30 Carries has 35 yards rushing and 0 td. rb2. The very next week. It’s 6.2 minutes into q1 and does not have a TD left. who has better chance at getting a TD The one who literally didn’t Or the one that has 90% of the game left to do so?1 point
-
1 point
-
No, it is not a plan. It is a critical examination of an approach used in refugee camps. Try reading the summary that says this is not feasible. And note the emphasis on refugees. "Public health not only focuses on the eradication of disease but addresses the entire spectrum of health and wellbeing. Populations displaced, due to natural disasters or war and, conflict are already fragile and have experienced increased mental, physical and/or emotional trauma. While the shielding approach is not meant to be coercive, it may appear forced or be misunderstood in humanitarian settings. As with many community interventions meant to decrease COVID-19 morbidity and mortality, compliance and behavior change are the primary rate-limiting steps and may be driven by social and emotional factors. These changes are difficult in developed, stable settings; thus, they may be particularly challenging in humanitarian settings which bring their own set of multi-faceted challenges that need to be taken into account. Household-level shielding seems to be the most feasible and dignified as it allows for the least disruption to family structure and lifestyle, critical components to maintaining compliance. However, it is most susceptible to the introduction of a virus due to necessary movement or interaction outside the green zone, less oversight, and often large household sizes. It may be less feasible in settings where family shelters are small and do not have multiple compartments. In humanitarian settings, small village, sector/block, or camp-level shielding may allow for greater adherence to proposed protocol, but at the expense of longer-term social impacts triggered by separation from friends and family, feelings of isolation, and stigmatization. Most importantly, accidental introduction of the virus into a green zone may result in rapid transmission and increased morbidity and mortality as observed in assisted care facilities in the US.26 This is what intelligent people do. They consider all the alternatives, examine each one critically, reject those that do not work, and provide a write up of their analysis so that others may benefit from it. What demagogues do is write disingenuous articles about it aimed at riling up people who will not think for themselves.1 point
-
Yah, and they banned CFCs (which were causing a lot of the ozone issues) through the Montreal Protocol. This reversed the process. What's your point?1 point
-
They call it climate change because it's a lot more than just warming. It's accompanied by other climate-related changes such as frequency and magnitude of storm events and higher or lower overall precip, depending upon location. Some areas also see more warming than others (eg areas closer to the poles). There's also PLENTY of data, spacially and temporally, so the " variability" has no bearing on the overall warming trend observed. Yes, every PhD climatologist says that earth is warming overall, and due to fossil fuels. It's because ALL the data easily demonstrates that. EASILY. Not because of a grand funding conspiracy.1 point
-
Late 80s early 90s had research meetings with climatologists, yes they had PhDs. What they were saying then is that we had just gone through a relative low variability period regarding climate etc and were now entering back into more normal (higher) variability. Now if you understand statistics, estimating models, time series etc and you are using data to estimate future events where older data is lower variability new is higher variability then you know the estimate trend can be biased by the direction of the first high variability observations. Hence not long after the new thing was global warming. Now if you understand Fed funding RFP etc they like to put out their new year RFPs in a new focused area. Hence a lot of money to study Global Warming. Well what do all the researchers do ... they write proposals to research Global Warming. Then when we find out its more of a new variability issue everyone is changing to Climate Change and hence new RFPs and new research on CC.1 point
-
1 point
-
Oh, so the Ds are not trying to protect the children. Good of you to acknowledge that by changing your tune. I could go with "The Republicans are protecting the most notorious pedophile ring in the world". But the Ds didn't do much to shine sunlight on this either, they are doing so now only for politics. And my guess is they think it will hurt the Rs worse than the Ds for the upcoming election. That is the only reason this effort is happening now. Where was this righteous anger years ago? Free the files!!! Let them be free! mspart1 point
-
Pretty much. Jay Den Williams from Michigan is #29 on MatScouts big board and is uncomitted.1 point
-
I'll go for NC State's lineup: 125 Vince Robinson 133 Zach Redding 141 Ryan Jack 149 Koy Buesgens or Daniel Zepeda 157 Jackson Arrington 165 Will Denny 174 Matty Singleton 184 Rylan Breen or possibly TJ Stewart 197 Cason Howle 285 Isaac Trumble There are a couple questions, especially 184-197 with both starters leaving. 149 could be either guy, but they will probably redshirt Zepeda.1 point
-
They had the best single combined NCAA tournament of any Lehigh duo, but several are in contention for best 1-2. The next closest in terms of team point production at a single tournament were Mark Lieberman and Mike Brown in 1979. On the year Brown and Liberman were more impressive. Brown was 21-3 with 15 bonus wins and Lieberman 21-0 with 20 bonus wins, whilst Rohn was 30-5 with 18 bonus wins and Trenge 34-4 with 17 bonus wins. Rohn had a great NCAA tournament but came in the as 8 seed. Lieberman was the 1 seed, and Brown and Trenge were both 2 seeds. Caruso and Pertiore are probably the best Lehigh 1-2 over the course of a career. Caruso won three titles at 123 and Petitore went 2-2-3 up a weight at 130 during the same period. Petriore's first two years he lost to Uetake in the final. His senior year he was the 1 seed and was upset by David McGuire who went on to win the tournament. Caruso and Peritore only lost 6 matches combined in their career and each had winning pct. over 90%. They were also back to back in the lineup 3/3 years which is more than Lieberman and Brown (3/4), and Rohn and Trenge (2/4). Probably the best Lehigh 1-2 punch all things considered. 2002: Rob Rohn (1st 184), John Trenge (2nd 197); Total (28+23=51) 1979: Mark Lieberman (1st 177), Mike Brown (2nd 190); Total (29+20=49) 1983: Pete Schuyler (3rd 134), Darryl Burley (1st 142); Total (18+24=42) 1978: Mark Lieberman (1st 177), Mike Brown (3rd 190); Total (22+18=40) 1967: Mike Caruso (1st 123), Joe Peritore (3rd 130); Total (23+15.5=38.5) 1965: Mike Caruso (1st 123), Joe Peritore (2nd 130); Total (20*+16=36) 1965: Joe Peritore (2nd 130), Bill Stuart (1st 137); Total (16+20=36) 1966: Mike Caruso (1st 123), Joe Peritore (2nd 130); Total (20*+16=36) 1976: Bob Sloand (4th 126), Mike Frick (1st 134); Total (13.5+21=34.5) 1974: Mike Frick (4th 126), Tom Sculley (1st 134); Total (14+20=34) 1965: Rich Warnke (4th 115), Mike Caruso (1st 123); Total (12.5+20*=32.5) *Caruso had a R32 bye in 1965 and 1966 which limited his bonus point potential. Career NCAA Team point production/Record Lieberman-Brown: (31.5+40+49=120.5), (2-Titles, 2-2nds, 1-3rd, 1-5th)/141-11 .928 Caruso-Peritore: (36+36+38.5=110.5), (3-Titles, 2-2nds, 1-3rd)/113-6-1 .942 Rohn-Trenge: (1^+51=52), (1-Title, 1-2nd)/123-25 .831 ^Trenge did not wrestle in the 2001 NCAA tournament despite qualifying. Rohn was the 11 seed and DNP.1 point
-
Carini's high ranking comes with SR's (Antonio) being removed. and what's left is not very deep. that being said, Carini still has two years of HS left. everyone is recruiting him.1 point
-
Just watched the 15 and 18 seed at 106 put up 42 points in a 21-20 win. Four minute match...1 point
-
1 point
-
He's going to look great after training with Yonger and Herrera during his redshirt year.1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
This shows that Trump is truly in the puppet master Putin's pocket. Trump tries to negotiate end to war. Putin effectively gives Trump the finger. Trump says now 100% tariffs on all Russian goods coming to US. In addition tariffs on countries that buy Russian oil or gas. That's right where Putin wanted to be I have no doubt. mspart1 point
-
Man this guy has braun and brains! With analysis like this who isn't listening to his podcast?1 point
-
You're interested in Nickal's pettiness? And you're framing this as someone else acting "cool" by pointing out this drives view and yet; So we DO care about the podcast, but not about the two of them Wrestling? Your posts seem incongruent.1 point
-
He can't pay me enough to listen to him, or visit his podcast or whatever it is that he does.1 point
-
‘One time David didn’t hold the door for me and another time he made me pay full price at his wife’s juice shop…can you believe this guy?’ *Cassar nods* ‘totally bro’1 point
-
1 point
-
Here are the NCAA point totals as scored from the round of 32 using a 1.5 point TF for all 15 point wins and the current placement point allocation for all pairs of champs at back to back weights since 1970 inclusive. The 2000-present best Iowa 1-2s are also included. The list is ordered by combined team points first than year. The minimum number of team points from two champs is 40 (assuming no subtractions and zero bonus) and the maximum is 60 (all pinfalls). No one pair hit the maximum. The closest a single wrestler was to the max in the set was David Taylor in 2012 with 29.5. One pair hit the minimum - Steve Marianetti and Ernest Benion both won titles in 1995 without scoring a single bonus point. 2012: David Taylor (1st 165), Ed Ruth (1st 174); Total (29.5+26.5=56) 2017: Zain Retherford (1st 149), Jason Nolf (1st 157); Total (28+27=55) 1973: Wade Schalles (1st 158), Bill Simpson(1st 167); Total (28+24=52) 1983: Ed Banach (1st 190), Lou Banach (1st Unl); Total (25+27=52) 1992: Tom Brands (1st 134), Troy Steiner (1st 142); Total (25+26.5=51.5) 1972: Ben Peterson (1st 190), Chris Taylor (1st Unl); Total (27+24=51) 1986: Kevin Dresser (1st 142), Jim Heffernan (1st 150); Total (26+25=51) 2019: Bo Nickal (1st 197), Anthony Cassar (1st 285): Total (27+24=51) 1992: Terry Brands (1st 126), Tom Brands (1st 134); Total (25.5+25=50.5) 2005: Johny Hendricks (1st 165), Chris Pendleton (1st 174); Total (25+25.5=50.5) 2024: Aaron Brooks (1st 197), Greg Kerkvliet (1st 285); Total (27+23.5=50.5)* 2017: Jason Nolf (1st 157), Vincenzo Joseph (1st 165); Total (27+23=50) 2017: Mark Hall (1st 174), Bo Nickal (1st 184); Total (22.5+27.5=50) 1975: Chuck Yagla (1st 150), Pat Holm (1st 158); Total (25+24.5=49.5) 1997: Lincoln McIlravy (1st 150), Joe Williams (1st 158); Total (24+25.5=49.5) 1970: Jason Smith (1st 167), Chuck Jean (1st 177); Total (25+24=49) 1982: Dave Schultz (1st 167), Mark Schultz (1st 177); Total (24+25=49) 1970: Dwayne Keller (1st 126), Darrell Keller (1st 134); Total (25.5+23=48.5) 1990: Terry Brands (1st 126), Tom Brands (1st 134); Total (23.5+24.5=48) 2018: Zain Retherford (1st 149), Jason Nolf (1st 157); Total (25+23=48) 1980: Joe Gonzales (1st 118), John Azevedo (1st 118); Total (24.5+23=47.5) 1984: Jim Scherr (1st 177), Bill Scherr (1st 190); Total (20**+27.5=47.5) 1996: Joe Williams (1st 158), Daryl Weber (1st 167); Total (22.5+25=47.5) 1987: Tim Krieger (1st 150), Stewart Carter (1st 158); Total (22+25=47) 1998: Teague Moore (1st 118), Eric Guerrero (1st 126); Total (23+24=47) 2002: Jared Lawrence (1st, 149), Luke Becker (1st 157); Total (23+24=47) 1993: Lincoln McIlravy (1st 142), Terry Steiner (1st 150); Total (21.5+25=46.5) 2023: Carter Starocci (1st 174), Aaron Brooks (1st 184); Total (24+22.5=46.5) 1970: Dave Martin (1st 158), Jason Smith (1st 167); Total (21+25=46) 1985: Melvin Douglas (1st 177), Dan Chaid (1st 190); Total (22+23=46) 1987: Royce Alger (1st 167), Rico Chiapparelli (1st 177); Total (25+21=46) 1999: Doug Schwab (1st 141), TJ Williams (1st 149); Total (22+24=46) 2005: Jake Rosholt (1st 197), Steve Mocco (1st 285); Total (20+23=46) 2021: Roman Bravo-Young (1st 133), Nick Lee (1st 141); Total (22.5+23.5=46) 2022: Roman Bravo-Young (1st 133), Nick Lee (1st 141); Total (23+23=46) 2025: Ridge Lovett (1st 149),Antrell Taylor (1st 157); Total (22.5+23.5=46)* 1998: Mark Ironside (1st 134), Jeff McGinness (1st 142); Total (23.5+22=45.5) 2000: Juergens (1st 133), Schwab (3rd 141); Total (25+20.5=45.5)+ 2017: Vincenzo Joseph (1st 165), Mark Hall (1st 174); Total (23+22.5=45.5) 1994: Pat Smith (1st 158), Mark Branch (1st 167); Total (24+21=45) 2018: Jason Nolf (1st 157), Vincenzo Joseph (1st 165); Total (23+21=44) 2021: Lee (1st 125), DeSanto (3rd 133); Total (24.5+19.5=44)+ 2022: Carter Starocci (1st 174), Aaron Brooks (1st 184); Total (22+22=44) 2008: Perry (1st 165), Borschell (3rd 174); Total (25+18.5=43.5)+ 2012: McDonough (1st 125), Ramos (3rd 133); Total (26+17.5=43.5)+ 2012: Steve Bosak (1st 184), Cam Simaz (1st 197); Total (21+22.5=43.5) 2022: Aaron Brooks (1st 184), Max Dean (1st 197); Total (22+21.5=43.5) 1972: Greg Johnson (1st 118), Pat Milkovich (1st 126); Total (22+21=43) 1993: Markus Mollica (1st 158), Ray Miller (1st 167); Total (20+23=43) 1993: Kevin Randleman (1st 177), Rex Holman (1st 190); Total (20+23=43) 2000: Strittmatter (3rd 125), Juergens (1st 133); Total (18+25=43)+ 2001: Strittmatter (2nd 125), Juergens (1st 133); Total (20+22=42)+ 2010: Jake Varner (21st 197), David Zabriskie (1st 285); Total (22+20=42) 2021: Carter Starocci (1st 174), Aaron Brooks (1st 184); Total (20+21.5=41.5) 1976: Lee Kemp (1st 158), Pat Christenson (1st 167); Total (21+20=41) 2001: Juergens (1st 133), Schwab (2nd 141); Total (22+19=41)+ 1995: Steve Marianetti (1st 150), Ernest Benion (1st 158); Total (20+20=40) 2017: Gilman (3rd 125), Clark (1st 133); Total (19.5+20=39.5)+ 2010: McDonough (1st 125), Dennis (2nd 133); Total (23.5+16=39.5)+ 2010: Marion (2nd 141), Metcalf (1st 149); Total (16+23=39)+ 2016: Gilman (2nd 125), Clark (2nd 133); Total (21.5+16=37.5)++ 2007: Perry (1st 165), Luedke (3rd 174); Total (22+13.5=35.5)+ 2005: Johnston (2nd 157), Perry (2nd 165); Total (17+18=35)++ 2010: Dennis (2nd 133), Marion (2nd 141); Total (16+16=32)++ * 3 point TD ** Bye in the round of 32 + One non-champ in the duo ++ Two non-champs in the duo1 point
-
1 point
-
Transfer Portal All Star Team so Far: 125: Dean Peterson (Iowa) 133: Richard Figueroa (Oklahoma State) 141: Nasir Bailey (Iowa) 149: Lachlan McNeil (Michigan) 157: Peyten Kellar (Oklahoma) 165: Rafael Hipolito (Oklahoma) 174: Lenny Pinto (Rutgers) 184: Rocco Welsh (Penn State) 197: Rocky Elam (Iowa State) 285: AJ Ferrari (Nebraska)1 point
-
Only 7 wrestlers have 4 wins against top 8 seeded wrestlers in a single tournament from an unseeded position or the bottom half of the bracket. Who is the last to do it?1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-04:00