Jump to content

Free the Lee - Unban the Dan edition: Should NJDan be unbanned?  

35 members have voted

  1. 1. Should NJDan be allowed back into the fold?

    • Yes, he is harmless.
      20
    • God, no. How could you even think that?
      15


Recommended Posts

Posted
33 minutes ago, BobDole said:

Anyone that posts on this thread is a suspected Dan alias.

Even you.

Even! You!

  • Fire 1

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Posted (edited)

I suggest if he wants to return it should only be by Trial By Combat

Or he can state why he should be allowed to return and we vote on it

Edited by PortaJohn

I Don't Agree With What I Posted

Posted
18 minutes ago, PortaJohn said:

I suggest if he wants to return it should only be by Trial By Combat

Or he can state why he should be allowed to return and we vote on it

I am not sure anybody would volunteer for him.

I will take on his ivy league lawyerisms and represent the winning team:

Team BanTheDanTheMan. 

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Posted
39 minutes ago, 98lberEating2Lunches said:

Sure.  But I'm all for banning all with auto signatures of their name or there phone type and that they used TapiTalk, or that appends the same quote over and over. @Husker_Ducan you manage that?

Eat me, kindly.

Also in your account settings you can turn signatures off.

  • Fire 1

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Posted
43 minutes ago, 98lberEating2Lunches said:

Sure.  But I'm all for banning all with auto signatures of their name or there phone type and that they used TapiTalk, or that appends the same quote over and over. @Husker_Ducan you manage that?

Here you go.

Screenshots_2022-11-17-19-28-04.png

Screenshots_2022-11-17-19-28-24.png

Screenshots_2022-11-17-19-28-43.png

Screenshots_2022-11-17-19-29-00.png

Screenshots_2022-11-17-19-29-18.png

  • Fire 1

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Posted
10 hours ago, ionel said:

Well sure ... you can pin your opponent or win by fall but a pinfall would require two opponents in a single match.  I'm guessing the great J Hammond was referring to two different matches.  😉

So, what if you techfall your opponent? A win by tech and a win by fall? But with only a single opponent. Hmmm. <scratches head>

  • Fire 1
Posted
11 hours ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

Let's start by stating the obvious.

NJDan is stubborn, obtuse, fractious, incapable of admitting error, and a bunch of other things. But, so what? While he can be a royal pain in the ass, he is not what I would consider a troll. As a matter of fact, he has some of the attributes that are often prized in discussion forums. He starts topics, he argues with everyone, he doubles down when wrong, but all in all he is pretty harmless.

So the question is, should NJDan be banned for being a pain in the ass? I am in the camp that he should not, but reasonable people might disagree. 

Besides, if we did not have him, who would we feel superior to?

I'm not in favor of banning someone for being a dope unless their ignorance becomes more of a net obstacle than source of entertainment.  In Dan's case, he is certainly unreasonable, but I didn't feel like he was overly antagonistic.  

  • Fire 1
Posted
6 hours ago, BobDole said:

Anyone that posts on this thread is a suspected Dan alias.

(♪) He's a snake in the grass I tell ya guys
He may look dumb but that's jus a disguise
He's a mastermind in the ways of espionage


They all started lookin' real suspicious at him
And he jumped up an' said jes' wait a minute Jim
You know he's lyin' I've been livin' here all of my life

 

I'm a faithfull follower of Brother John Burch
And I belong to the Antioch Baptist Church
And I ain't even got a garage you can call home and ask my wife (♪)

  • Haha 1
Posted
54 minutes ago, GreatWhiteNorth said:

So, what if you techfall your opponent? A win by tech and a win by fall? But with only a single opponent. Hmmm. <scratches head>

A new rule invented to keep folks from scoring too many points, named as a sub species of the fall animal therefore a techfall.  Sure we don't like it but we've learned to live with it.  😉

  • Haha 1

.

Posted
5 hours ago, Mike Parrish said:

Make him use his actual face as his profile picture.

Hmmm... I don't think that will happen.

D3

Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.

Posted

... but the posters over on the Big Red wrestling forum all (AND sincerely) would love for you all to "encourage" him to come on over here.

No... I really mean it!

D3

Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Rankings

  • College Commitments

    Calli Gilchrist

    Choate Rosemary Hall, Connecticut
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Brown (Women)
    Projected Weight: 124

    Dean Bechtold

    Owen J. Roberts, Pennsylvania
    Class of 2026
    Committed to Lehigh
    Projected Weight: 285

    Zion Borge

    Westlake, Utah
    Class of 2026
    Committed to Army West Point
    Projected Weight: 133, 141

    Taye Wilson

    Pratt, Kansas
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Little Rock
    Projected Weight: 165, 174

    Eren Sement

    Council Rock North, Pennsylvania
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Michigan
    Projected Weight: 141
×
×
  • Create New...