https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/18/tulsi-gabbard-obama-2016-election-russia
https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/19/politics/gabbard-threatens-obama-officials-2016-election
https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/press-releases/press-releases-2025/4086-pr-15-25
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/doj-receives-gabbards-criminal-referral-bombshell-claims-obama-admin-manufactured-russian-collusion-hoax
By now we all have known about the hoax for many years. But that it was initiated by Obama and his folks before leaving office is a bombshell new piece of solid info, where it was suspected for years with no real evidence.
The info is now with DOJ for action.
SCOTUS decided that if a president does stuff as a part of his duties, he should be immune from prosecution. Is setting up the incoming President and his staff part of his official duties? I'm not saying Obama should be prosecuted, I don't have much info other than the above. But if he was, would the SCOTUS decision protect him from prosecution?
mspart