mspart

It's because of bird covid. We used to have chickens but got rid of them. In the end the raccoons got rid of them, except for one. We had them caged with chicken wire and the raccoons would spook the chickens and make them fly all around, right into them and they woudl grab them and kill them. One got pulled through the chicken wire. That one chicken left was a nervous wreck. We had to isloate here and that was her new safe place at night. Chickens are so stupid they don't know how to just stay safe in the middle of the coup. They have to fly all over like crazies and get caught . We finally gave the last chicken away. mspart

I will look up how to do jerky and let y'all know how it goes when it warms up a bit here. mspart

I remember being upset with Bush when he let that happen. mspart

I am saying that Biden pressured his DOJ to go after Trump and was upset that it took so long. That is going after a political enemy which most on here decried when Trump asked Ukraine to look into the Bidens. The article is the best I could find to describe what Biden did. No he never ordered the DOJ to prosecute Trump but pressured them to do so and wondered out loud about having even nominated his AG, Garland. And dropping the charges with prejudice keeps the charges on the books against Adams, just that the DOJ will not now pursue it. It is an election year for Adams and the DOJ has a working rule that they don't mess with elections. Something the DOJ seems to have forgotten. mspart

That would be good. Trust but verify! mspart

Constitution Article I, section 9, clause 7: No money shall be drawn from the treasury, but in consequence of appropriations made by law; and a regular statement and account of receipts and expenditures of all public money shall be published from time to time. Constitution Amendment 10: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people. Calling your bluff. What do these have anything in the world to do with the Federal government having to fund the states? It doesn't. So you are dead wrong. Period. You are welcome to try again. Anyone can spout some spot in the Constitution to support their claim but it would be wise to at least read those things to make sure they do what you say they do. What is coercive in removing DOJ funding? They (NY) are not helping the DOJ, why should they get DOJ funding. Rikers is reopening their ICE location after consultation with NYC Mayor Adams. I would expect that NYC would not lose their DOJ funding. But the rest of the state is not helpful and actively opposes the DOJ in removing illegal aliens, even those that are felons. There is no reason the Federal government should give money for this kind of behavior. Try again, mspart

This is good. Like the DOJ did not cook up charges against Trump due to Biden pressuring them to do so. https://www.nysun.com/article/biden-seethes-over-garlands-lack-of-swift-prosecution-of-trump-as-well-as-targeting-hunter-report mspart

Bazinga!!! No wonder the left and the media are tearing heir hair out. mspart

Where in the Constitution does it require the federal government to provide money to states and city governments? mspart

Actually it is not. The Feds offer money but the entity receiving it must comply with any requirements to receive the money. The Feds are not obligated to offer the money. mspart

It was up until the time sanctuary entities became all the rage. Before that there was great cooperation between federal and local authorities. So don't get high on your horse. It is not the job of the federal government to infuse a city with cash that does not assist in enforcing immigration law. They are all about to find that out. mspart

I don't think it was so much an order that was cancelled, but an appropriation that has now been cancelled. they will still put money in for armored e cars, just not specifically from Tesla as it was previously written by the prior admin. mspart

Brooks missed the Zagreb also. Is he hurt? Looks like a nice event. mspart

And the fact that Tesla has now been erased as the provider of said E vehicles. mspart

OK, fair enough. Did you oppose Robert Byrd for similar reasons? That's a rhetorical question, you don't have to answer or put up a whataboutism thing in your response. mspart

As GDP rises, so does taxable income and so does revenue for the Treasury. It isn't as difficult to understand as you make it sound. Currently The US spends 25% of the GDP. What should they spend in comparison to the GDP? mspart

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5119208-white-house-emmer-jeffries-apology/ The White House on Friday called for House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) to apologize for remarks pledging to push back against the Trump administration’s agenda. Jeffries at a press briefing stressed “the need to look out for everyday New Yorkers and everyday Americans who are under assault by an extreme MAGA Republican agenda that is trying to cut taxes for billionaire donors and wealthy corporations, and then stick New Yorkers and working-class Americans … with the bill.” “We are gonna fight it legislatively. We are gonna fight it in the courts. And we’re gonna fight it in the streets,” Jeffries said. A release from the White House communications office Friday then blasted Jeffries for what it characterized as “a sick call for violence.” You would think these paragons of non violence would use different wording to get their ideas across. Oh how they screamed that Palin was inciting violence when she said they were targeting an Arizona D rep for a challenge in the election. Oh my!! mspart

I'll make it easy for you my fun loving little crustacean, Thread Title: What do woke {left} wingers think about Ron Paul My remark, second for the thread: They hate him as surely as they hate Elon. Period. A 4th grader would (should that is, look at the state of education these days) know who "they" are by the context. I know context is not needed in the bottoms of the salt water seas, but c'mon man!! You being confused about what a woke left winger is a joke right. You were actually confused? You must really be clueless about what the left represents. mspart

How much makes it to Africa, India and Bangladesh. If anything like her parents foundation, very little. Hopefully not. mspart

So is Rep Garcia calling for an actual insurrection? Perish the thought. That certainly cannot be the case. They cried about Trump doing that without actual weapons. The Ds have nothing to offer the American people anymore. They have imploded under the weight of their own stupidity. mspart

Whoever it was, he/she was not elected. mspart

And that money went straight to the Elon gofundme account right? Let me let you in a little secret. America voted against the transgender agenda. This is right inline with those that voted in Trump. mspart

Woot!! mspart

https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/no-400m-armored-tesla-contract-says-elon-musk-as-state-dept-drops-order-from-procurement-list-1034356206 “No $400M Armored Tesla Contract” says Elon Musk as State Dept. Drops Order from Procurement List The U.S. State Department is not planning to award Tesla (TLSA) a $400 million contract to purchase armored vehicles. At least that’s what appears to be the case following the latest twist in a bizarre story about procurement and Tesla armored vehicles that has raised questions about Elon Musk’s role within the new administration. The State Department was planning to buy $400 million of “Armored Tesla” later this year, according to its 2025 procurement forecast, first detailed by reports in Drop Site News and the New York Times. Responding to developments, Musk replied, “I’m pretty sure Tesla isn’t getting $400M. No one mentioned it to me, at least.” It’s worth noting that the original State Department procurement form was from before the Trump administration took over. The last paragraph there is telling. This was not a Trump inspired purchase. It was on the books before Trump landed. This is not happening. NO WAY you say!! Oh the tragedy of NPR not actually doing due diligence and reporting faithfully on the truth. mspart

This is what a lot of people have been waiting for. Trump is showing the way. I was for DeSantis but I don't think he would have done this kind of housecleaning. But whoever follows Trump, probably Vance, will need to continue this as this is a new day for Republicans. I too want things done legally but I don't see where that has been a problem so far. Judge allowed the early retirement plan that Trump put out there. I think most of these other things will be found to be legal and proper. mspart