mspart

I think you are not telling the whole story here. mspart

Wow, that crazy news. mspart

We've been through that before. It was a waste of time. If Ds are capable of learning and adapting like most humans, they will excise this from their playbook. mspart

If he is still a billionaire after going bankrupt 6 times, that seems like a pretty good business model. Using the laws of the land to his advantage. mspart

We are grousing about Trump's picks. What about Biden's picks? Any concern with any of these? Alejandro Mayorkis - Fails to keep the homeland safe from illegal entry of thugs and criminals and terrorists, people from over 150 countries coming in via the southern border. All along he says the border is under control. Lying right to our faces. Discuss. mspart

MSNBC among other media companies helped Kamala lose the election due to: 1. Continue the lie that Biden was better than 100% when people could plainly see he wasn't. 2. That scientists that said the Covid most likely orginated in a lab were called kooks and deniers by MSNBC and other media. 3. Calling Kamala a drag on Bidens campaign and then all of the sudden she is the savior of the D party. People could plainly see through t hat bunch of lies that MSNBC and media dictated. 4. The joy campaign that all media companies, including MSNBC, said about Kamala. A little suspicious when every outlet is saying the same thing. Give credence to lies they tell. 5. Obvious political leanings of MSNBC and other media that say they are neutral. 6. Calling Trump a Hitler and fascist when we saw his 4 years and saw none of that. I need not go on. Yes, examples can be found everywhere. But alternative reality? Nice try. mspart

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/11/25/jack-smith-drops-case-trump-election-00191514 mspart

She created a whole new level of obnoxious word salad that will not be surpassed for years. Tough to break that ceiling. mspart

Elon looking to buy MSNBC maybe. Folks at MSNBC are very worried that they can no longer lie for a living. What a sweet gig they have. mspart

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_Dragons_(gang) I believe in them. mspart

What we've got here is failure to communicate. Some crustaceans, you just can't reach. So you get what we had here last week -- which is the way he wants it. Well, he gets it. And I don't like it anymore than you men. So I think everyone is correct here. Insurance companies don't have anything to invest if they don't sell insurance. But what that tells you is that they bring in a lot more than they payout generally speaking. So they invest the difference and that is what makes almost all of the profit for them and increases their ability to payout when the big storms happen. Honestly, I can't believe I am sticking up for our arrogant and testy crustacean. But he is our crustacean after all!! mspart

I wish I had 5 million in my 401K. No matter how much I wish it, it just doesn't happen. mspart

White House chief of staff: Susie Wiles Attorney general: Pam Bondi (after Matt Gaetz withdrew) U.N. ambassador: Elise Stefanik Secretary of education: Linda McMahon Secretary of homeland security: Kristi Noem Director of national intelligence: Tulsi Gabbard White House press secretary: Karoline Leavitt Yep, he is scared of strong women. Good catch, I should have figured that out. mspart

I suppose. mspart

Discuss. mspart

I thought you were talking about fish. Now I get it!!!!! mspart

Hey RL, you might want to read what you responded to and see if you can see it. mspart

This ^ mspart

Let's hope so. mspart

Trump hates strong women. It's obvious. mspart

OK, I'll bite. What was he exactly charged with doing? The judge gave the jury an out: They could pick one of three things they thought he did and if they all came up with one of those, he was guilty. Similar to saying he either killed someone, kicked someone, or spat on someone. Jury gets to decide. 1/3 could say he killed someone, 1/3 could say he kicked someone, and 1/3 could say he spat on someone. And he'd be found guilty even though the jury couldn't decide exactly what he did. Please tell me how something like this could be sent to a jury trial. I've never heard of being found guilty of several separate things and that counting as convicted to charges in a felony case. There is a reason many lawyers called this a novel case never before done. Elie Honig is one. https://electionlawblog.org/?p=143384 So, to inflate the charges up to the lowest-level felony (Class E, on a scale of Class A through E) — and to electroshock them back to life within the longer felony statute of limitations — the DA alleged that the falsification of business records was committed “with intent to commit another crime.” Here, according to prosecutors, the “another crime” is a New York State election-law violation, which in turn incorporates three separate “unlawful means”: federal campaign crimes, tax crimes, and falsification of still more documents. Inexcusably, the DA refused to specify what those unlawful means actually were — and the judge declined to force them to pony up — until right before closing arguments. So much for the constitutional obligation to provide notice to the defendant of the accusations against him in advance of trial. (This, folks, is what indictments are for.) As I said. Please tell me where he gets this wrong. mspart

So you agree with me. Very interesting. The indictment, which is the charges, do not specifically state what the actual charges are. Trump is entitled by the Constitution to know what he is being charged with so he can mount a defense. Why do you use jury instructions which is after the fact. So you are in effect saying the charges were not known until jury instructions. Sounds like a pre-determined result. It was a faux prosecution and the appeal will show this. Now why did the indictment not state exactly what law was he breaking specifically? Why term it as "another law"? You have to break a law to be prosecuted for it. You and Bragg are not able to enumerate that. Another wrinkle: How could he conceal anything when the records were made after the election? Do you ever defend a client without knowing exactly what he/she did to break the law? If so, did you not seek dismissal based on the 6th Amendment? Quoted here: Amendment VI (1791) In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense. mspart

How many of those are because the worker wouldn't take the jab. There were quite a number here in WA that were /are in that boat. In fact many of the Ferry workers were let go because of this. Plus this was talking about federal employees. Your site only talks about state and local employees. Next. mspart

From the indictment of the NY case. THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK, by this indictment, accuses the defendant of the crime of FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE, in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows: The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about February 14, 2017, with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an invoice from Michael Cohen dated February 14, 2017, marked as a record of the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization. SECOND COUNT: AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the defendant of the crime of FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE, in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows: The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about February 14, 2017, with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an entry in the Detail General Ledger for the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust, bearing voucher number 842457, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization. It goes on for 34 counts. They all say roughly the same thing as is bolded. The whole felony basis of this with thee "another crime". What is that crime I wonder. Bragg didn't say, Judge couldn't say, and Jury didn't know. Perhaps you know what the specific crime was that turned misdemeanors into felonies. If you can, you would be the only one ever to know. If you can't, then saying what I wrote is flatly untrue is a bit of conjecture that is made to sound knowledgeable. mspart

This happened to at least one home in my neighborhood. And another in a few miles down the road. At least two trees fell in the neighborhood taking out over head power and other infrastructure lines. I had to drive over power lines and just underneath to get to work. One fatality in another town was a lady taking a shower when the tree came down. She was dead before aid could come. mspart