Jump to content

mspart

Members
  • Posts

    5,944
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    43

Everything posted by mspart

  1. There is no rationalization. Trump doesn't want to bring him back. He is listening to the attorneys with responsibility here. Again, the question revolved around jury trials for all deportations all illegal aliens and he wasn't sure that was a good or proper idea. That is where he wasn't sure. He said they will follow SCOTUS. Legally, what does facilitate mean? Due process was given Abrego in 2019. The conditions of that are now no longer a deal. So his protective order of release into the country is no longer valid. I really don't see an issue. If he comes back, he will be deported again. mspart
  2. Bukele has said he will not deport Abrego to US . He is a criminal there so that won't happen. “The question is preposterous. How can I smuggle a terrorist into the United States?” Bukele, seated alongside Trump, told reporters in the Oval Office Monday. “I don’t have the power to return him to the United States.” So chances are that it is not going to happen. mspart
  3. I haven't heard Trump throw the F bomb, but I feel the same way regardless of who does it. If you are going to talk so that you can't be fully covered in the press, that is not a proper look when you are gov official and the gov prohibits that language on air. mspart
  4. mspart

    MAGA

    Trump's trolling is awesome to watch. mspart
  5. I'm glad you are back to the issue at hand rather than Trump saying he won't follow the whole constitution. This guy had due process in 2019. The conditions of his situation have changed. Therefore his immigration status changed. But to say he hasn't had due process is not true. Due process for this deportation is another question which SCOTUS said Trump need to facilitate Abrego's return. Does that mean going in and storming the castle? Does that mean asking El Salvador nicely? Or something in between? mspart
  6. The discussion was regarding deporting illegal aliens. When the question of the constitution came up this is the context and why he responded that if they had to do millions of jury hearings, that would be too expensive. KRISTEN WELKER: Your secretary of state says everyone who’s here, citizens and non-citizens, deserve due process. Do you agree, Mr. President? PRES. DONALD TRUMP: I don’t know. I’m not, I’m not a lawyer. I don’t know. KRISTEN WELKER: Well, the Fifth Amendment says as much. PRES. DONALD TRUMP: I don’t know. It seems — it might say that, but if you’re talking about that, then we’d have to have a million or 2 million or 3 million trials. We have thousands of people that are some murderers and some drug dealers and some of the worst people on Earth. KRISTEN WELKER: But is — PRES. DONALD TRUMP: Some of the worst, most dangerous people on Earth. And I was elected to get them the hell out of here and the courts are holding me from doing it. KRISTEN WELKER: But even given those numbers that you’re talking about, don’t you need to uphold the Constitution of the United States as president? PRES. DONALD TRUMP: I don’t know. I have to respond by saying, again, I have brilliant lawyers that work for me, and they are going to obviously follow what the Supreme Court said. What you said is not what I heard the Supreme Court said. They have a different interpretation. The question was about due process and the constitutional guarantee of due process. Due process does not mean a jury trial in the case of immigration. An immigration judge stating the illegal needs to be deported is due process. It's best to understand things based on context. The context is due process in deporting illegals. The context is not the Constitution which everyone is trying to make this. The next question is why is the press and the left willing to die on the Abrego hill? If he does come back, he will just be deported again. The conditions of his "stay in the US for free card" are not the same as they were in 2019 and he could easily be deported with those details brought before an immigration judge. The man was transporting illegals using his boss's car with no license to drive. And the boss is in jail for transporting illegals. Put 2 and 2 together folks on Abrego. But the questioning that has everyone all jittery was all about the treatment of illegal aliens. You'll notice that no one is talking about the child citizens who were deported anymore. Because it was a non story. Mom was being deported and wanted her children to come with her. Period, end of story. No apologies for not investigating more and figuring that out on their own, the press is completely out of control on their non investigative approach to reporting news. This is very much the case. Take a quote out of context and run with it to show the Pres does not feel he has to follow the Constitution in any case whatsoever. mspart
  7. I think he'll go one more time. If he loses, that may be it. If he loses, that hurts physically and emotionally and that is something he is not used to. He took some heavy knees, bad defense. Like I could do better ha ha. mspart
  8. Cedudo lost the last two matches I saw. He looked listless and not willing to do anything aggressive. Has he had more fights since then? That was about a year ago. mspart
  9. That's real racial segregation. Absolutely. Of course you are unaware of actual segregated commencement ceremonies held at universities across the nation for the last number of years. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/apr/17/colleges-double-down-on-segregated-graduations-ami/ https://universitybusiness.com/colleges-expand-segregated-graduation-events/ https://www.thecollegefix.com/harvard-cuts-funding-for-racially-segregated-graduation-ceremonies/ https://www.insidehighered.com/news/students/diversity/2023/05/02/conservatives-rail-against-segregated-graduations As noted, it looks like Harvard is ending the practice but only because they were coerced to do so. mspart
  10. I did it with a VW bug, a '65 Bug. They were smallisher people. Granted not enough seat belts but we never added them to that car anyway so they laid down on the bump. I have to say that with ta many people in the car, the bug had very little get up and go. Good thing we didn't have to cross any crazy mountain passes. mspart
  11. D's believe that going crude and rude is going to give them more votes. Generally speaking you want someone really smart to vote for, someone with decorum, not someone stupid enough to talk like that. mspart
  12. You should ask grok if it wants to take over the world. I'm a boomer and don't know how to do that nifty stuff. mspart
  13. We have a jungle here in Seattle. mspart
  14. I've done it many times. Great experience each time. mspart
  15. Like the gov getting bigger is a good thing? mspart
  16. My son runs a few businesses and my neighbor too. They both say this same thing. Young workers are the worst. mspart
  17. Universities have been segregating for years now. Separate commencement activities etc. By their actions they show they are not for desegregation. They are all about stirring the pot of racial animosity and creating racism. mspart
  18. Make it great again as opposed to the mantra of Obama that we are just another nation among nations. Ours is no more special than any other. Get used to low economic activity, it is the new normal. Make America Great Again is a fight against that kind of mindset in my opinion. mspart
  19. Good news for the economy. Markets reacted positively today. mspart
  20. You are right. The WI SC is absolutely correct in the action they took. RV would disagree. I don't think I am being defensive, but perhaps i am, but I feel I am just looking at it from an objective viewpoint. The judge ushered the illegal alien and his attorney out a door to evade ICE. That is against the law as it has been shown by quoting the law. It really is as simple as that. Just because this person is a judge in WI gives her no right to break the law, nor does it give her a right to avoid consequences for breaking the law. RV continues to think this is an indication of a dictator doing his thing and there is no basis for taking legal action against her. mspart
  21. unlike the constant lies have impacted you though. mspart
  22. A number of allegations have been made here with no evidence. That is how the press says it constantly. mspart
  23. With that attitude, they wouldn't let you in in the fist place. mspart
  24. Any word on the Fix injury? mspart
  25. Predictions for RBY? I would say he makes the finals. Other than that I don't have a guess. mspart
×
×
  • Create New...