Jump to content

mspart

Members
  • Posts

    6,255
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    43

Everything posted by mspart

  1. The courts, including SCOTUS said the admin had to try to get Abrego back. After a delay, he came back. So they complied. A dictator or king would not do that. I have not seen any evidence of umarked cars or non uniform agents. I said I didn't not doubt that, but felt that uniforms, without names, but identifying law enforcement affiliation was something that should be done. In general I am in agreement with the OP. mspart
  2. Yah, that NYC mayoral candidate escorting an illegal. Wanted to see the warrant. I'm wondering what basis does he have to demand to see a warrant? He is not the target. But he became a target as he kept trying to keep officials from his "friend". He did not try to stop the arrest, but would not let go of his illegal buddy, and demanded the warrant. He got arrested after he would not stop trying to hang onto the illegal. But I did not see him attack an agent or anything and I'm guessing that is why the charges were not filed. If he hd pushed or shoved or hit, he would be in deeper trouble. mspart
  3. yeah, actually completely on the first three. So your argument is not sustainable. The next three are up to SCOTUS. As I said, if SCOTUS says district judges can do these things, Trump will comply unlike a King or Dictator. if they say district judges can't do this, then Trump comply with SCOTUS, unlike a King or Dictator. Very poor excuse for a rebuttal UB. You need to try harder. Except you can't because you are wrong. mspart
  4. Hand he's right at the center of political thought. Just ask, he'll tell you. mspart
  5. Yep, count 1 is not fulfilled yet. Count 2, Gaza war is worse than ever? Not even. That is a stretch to defy rational thought. Count 3 Trump negotiated and gave Iran 60 days. No deal at the end of 60 days. Israel bombs them the day after. Again, this source of yours is willfully wrong, trying to tell lies that are not true but if told enough, people will believe. Who's tactic is that? mspart
  6. Again, you are speaking of district court judges moving out of their lane and going national. There is a reason they are district courts, because they serve the district, not the nation. Therefore that would be an unlawful order to follow until further appeal clarifies the situation. Trump complied with the Abrego decision and Abrego is back, but tied up with federal charges. So you are wrong. Trump sent people to El Salvador. The district judge said you can't do that and bring them back. It was too late for that. But have any illegals since gone to El Salvador? NO. Those are just two of your 0 for 6. mspart
  7. I would have said, I don't agree with this you jerkface of a troll, piece of anchovie pizza, woman beater. Cav, you are a much better man than I. mspart
  8. I showed that you were 0 for 6 on this count and yet you still are making the same assertions. Some people can't be taught. mspart
  9. Certainly don't expect the torching of waymo cars or looting stores, actions that do nothing to address the issue they supposedly are against. mspart
  10. Absolutely wrong. Conservatives love the rule of law and personal freedom as outlined in the Constitution. What looks like authoritarianism to you is the government finally enforcing the law. Conservatives do not like anarchy. The issue conservatives have with communism is the lack of personal freedom and government in everything business and personal. That is borne out by the dismal record of communist governments. What you see as authoritarianism, (ICE going after illegals, Feds calling out the Nat guard for ICE riots, etc) is the government enforcing law and order. mspart
  11. So you are saying the governments going after criminal illegal aliens is a good thing. Glad we got that out of the way. Assuming most feel like you, what is the issue with ICE protests? mspart
  12. Better yet, lets send the leftists to palestine and Iran and help them defend themselves. Hopefully they don't open their mouths about equal rights, and gay /trans rights. Then they will find out why they don't want to be there. mspart
  13. Already debunked mostly. mspart
  14. Why would they need to show him the warrant. He is not the one that is the subject of the warrant. Wrong guy asking for the warrant. mspart
  15. Today, Homan reported that yesterday there were the smallest number of illegal entries ever, under 100. He compared that to Biden time where thousands were allowed in everyday. Which is better UB, RV, Trip? mspart
  16. I read an opinion piece in The Hill website. This guy said that Padilla identifies himself and then asked his question and got tackled for it. That is not what the video showed. The video shows him approaching the secretary yelling something (presumably questions) and then gets man handled and is refusing to go with security so there is a struggle and then he identifies himself as Padilla. 1. You don't go to a press conference and approach the speaker. 2. You don't interrupt the speaker while they are in the middle of their statement. 3. Even if you are a sitting US Senator. 4. What happened to him would have happened to anyone doing the same thing. mspart
  17. So UB, you are 0 for 3 definitely, and 0-6 most likely based on probably SCOTUS decisions. Historically, district courts can only deal with the case before them, applying only to their district. Yet there have been a huge number of district court injunctions against the Trump admin that go outside their district. So that is a Constitutional question that should be dealt with. mspart
  18. Agreed and thank you. mspart
  19. I think they should be in uniform, without names on the uniform, but identified as ICE etc. Masks are ok to keep from creeps identifying them so they and their families are as safe from nefarious goons as possible. If, and I mean if, this is really happening, then there is no doubt someone will get shot for their own protection. By if, I mean I have not heard of this, but am not ruling it out as the law enforcement is trying to stay safe. mspart
  20. They had 60 days to negotiate. Apparently they didn't. So Trump goaded them not to sign an agreement? mspart
  21. Please someone, talk to Tesla. I saw one of these on the road the other day. mspart
  22. Ouch!!!! That had to hurt! mspart
  23. Is the JPCOA the deal that Obama gave Iran and in exchange sent huge bags of unmarked bills totaling billions of dollars? That was a great deal. Turned them back into a terrorist funder. mspart
  24. Do you not think that is a pretty good negotiating tactic, especially since many of his right hand men have been eliminated. They knew where they were and now they are gone. He is in a precarious position and owes his life to restraint or so Trump would have him believe. It would be a death wish to continue on the path he has been on, or so Trump would have him believe. Interesting that these religious islamists don't feel the need to keep their promises to the unwashed. Anything negotiated is not worth the paper that it is written on. Time and time again. How many times do they need to do this before we figure out their M.O. mspart
×
×
  • Create New...