Jump to content

Proposed college wrestling rule changes


VakAttack

Recommended Posts

Wrestling community in a nutshell.

Proposal: Hey maybe we should do similar things to the organizations that have made their sports Uber successful and popular…

Wrestling people… “ahhhhh!!! Nooooo!! change is scary. Let’s keep doing same things and watch sport keep shrinking.. and just blame it on “da kids these days”

 

and um to the person saying without riding time people will just stall on bottom… no

  • Fire 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Scouts Honor said:

I started thinking about the football passing rules... that did cause more scoring. and that is what was wanted... 

however, would like to see the data on increased viewership based on this scoring.. i may have to do some digging.

 

I think the increased availability of betting on games and parts of games has increased viewership more than any actual rules change however...

 

84634581-7859-45FC-9815-640AD8505B22.png

  • Fire 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Formally140 said:

Wrestling community in a nutshell.

Proposal: Hey maybe we should do similar things to the organizations that have made their sports Uber successful and popular…

Wrestling people… “ahhhhh!!! Nooooo!! change is scary. Let’s keep doing same things and watch sport keep shrinking.. and just blame it on “da kids these days”

 

and um to the person saying without riding time people will just stall on bottom… no

change for change's sake is bad. things like that get you the 'ball grab'

if you have numbers to back up your proposals fine. lets do it.

but we aren't seeing these numbers...

 

i mean is it really broke? the numbers went down for viewership one year... does that mean the sky is falling? 

Edited by Scouts Honor
  • Fire 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Caveira said:

 

84634581-7859-45FC-9815-640AD8505B22.png

I was thinking more since 1978 when the 5 yard rule was instituted...i started prelim research... and was not very successful,, it's going to take more than a few hours

but i like the chart... wonder what caused the decline in 11 and 12 and 16, 17

Edited by Scouts Honor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Demo Audience Rating
2023-Mar-18L: 2023 NCAA WRESTING CHAMPIONSHIP
L: 2023 NCAA WRESTLING CHAMPIONSHIPS
HH 297,100 0.24
P2+ 454,000 0.15
P18-49 104,000 0.08
P25-54 158,000 0.13
2023-Mar-17L: 2023 NCAA WRESTING CHAMPIONSHIP
L: 2023 NCAA WRESTLING CHAMPIONSHIPS
HH 235,200 0.19
P2+ 345,000 0.11
P18-49 111,000 0.09
P25-54 145,900 0.12
2023-Mar-16L: 2023 NCAA WRESTING CHAMPIONSHIP
NCAA CHAMPIONSHIPS, SECOND ROUND
HH 186,000 0.15
P2+ 251,000 0.08
P18-49 78,500 0.06

 

Fr2Nc-CWwAAHD_V?format=jpg&name=large

 

Edited by Scouts Honor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:
Demo Audience Rating
2023-Mar-18L: 2023 NCAA WRESTING CHAMPIONSHIP
L: 2023 NCAA WRESTLING CHAMPIONSHIPS
HH 297,100 0.24
P2+ 454,000 0.15
P18-49 104,000 0.08
P25-54 158,000 0.13
2023-Mar-17L: 2023 NCAA WRESTING CHAMPIONSHIP
L: 2023 NCAA WRESTLING CHAMPIONSHIPS
HH 235,200 0.19
P2+ 345,000 0.11
P18-49 111,000 0.09
P25-54 145,900 0.12
2023-Mar-16L: 2023 NCAA WRESTING CHAMPIONSHIP
NCAA CHAMPIONSHIPS, SECOND ROUND
HH 186,000 0.15
P2+ 251,000 0.08
P18-49 78,500 0.06

 

Fr2Nc-CWwAAHD_V?format=jpg&name=large

 

Good grief, you don't need cable to watch ESPN.  🙄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

change for change's sake is bad. things like that get you the 'ball grab'

if you have numbers to back up your proposals fine. lets do it.

but we aren't seeing these numbers...

 

i mean is it really broke? the numbers went down for viewership one year... does that mean the sky is falling? 

You’re being deliberately obtuse about the overall trends…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Scouts Honor said:
Demo Audience Rating
2023-Mar-18L: 2023 NCAA WRESTING CHAMPIONSHIP
L: 2023 NCAA WRESTLING CHAMPIONSHIPS
HH 297,100 0.24
P2+ 454,000 0.15
P18-49 104,000 0.08
P25-54 158,000 0.13
2023-Mar-17L: 2023 NCAA WRESTING CHAMPIONSHIP
L: 2023 NCAA WRESTLING CHAMPIONSHIPS
HH 235,200 0.19
P2+ 345,000 0.11
P18-49 111,000 0.09
P25-54 145,900 0.12
2023-Mar-16L: 2023 NCAA WRESTING CHAMPIONSHIP
NCAA CHAMPIONSHIPS, SECOND ROUND
HH 186,000 0.15
P2+ 251,000 0.08
P18-49 78,500 0.06

 

Fr2Nc-CWwAAHD_V?format=jpg&name=large

 

I've been doing audience and consumer research for about 30 years.

Cord cutting is definitely a factor in Nielsen's viewing estimates, which both do and do not streaming content depending on the source and how we're calculating audience data. But, neither would account for this large of a year over year audience drop.

IMO, stars and stories mattered more.

Do not underestimate the lack of crossover stars in this year's tournament. Yianni D. is not Gable Steveson, and four titles may be really cool to we wrestlers but is not as unique as it was for either Dake or Cael.

Plus, don't underestimate the impact of other programming on this year's audience ratings. The first weekend of the NCAA Men's Basketball tournament was absolutely wild - ironic that all of those upsets led to lower ratings for the Final 4 and championship game given the lack of blue bloods at the end - or the impact of a generational talent (Caitlin Clark) playing in the women's tournament.

At the end of the day, casual fans had a lot of intriguing viewing options that weekend. Moving the tournament to April - I'm intrigued by the unique place the Frozen Four has between March Madness and the start of the NBA and NHL Playoffs - may be helpful for audience ratings.

As for me, I was at my son's district swimming championships and didn't watch a match either Day 2 or 3 of the tournament. Life gets in the way.

Dan McDonald (sometimes known as "Voice of the Quakers")
Vice President, Research, National Association of Broadcasters

Edited by Voice of the Quakers
  • Fire 6

Dan McDonald, Penn '93
danmc167@yahoo.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe viewership would be increased if it wasn’t so dominated and segregated by pay per view.  If I pay for espn+ I can watch a few Big 12 matches, with commercials.  But there are a lot of BIG10, PAC12, ACC, matches that I can’t watch live, but some time later I may find a replay.  At the same time that a 1 vs 2 wrestling dual is on a pay per view that I can’t get, espnu is showing a division 2 women’s basketball game that has mostly a regional interest.  If you want more people to watch then make it easier for more people to watch, only to find that the premier matchup isn’t going to occur because one, or both, of the wrestlers don’t wrestle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Caveira said:

 

84634581-7859-45FC-9815-640AD8505B22.png

That's because the rule changes sucked. People point to football but it's living off gamblers and fantasy football. People don't give a ***duck duck goose** about the games its all about their stupid fantasy team. This last super bowl was so boring it was unbelievable and the score was huge but there was literally no defense outside of one play. They neutered defense for the sake of stats and now their fan base is all based on weird commodity around their brand. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/19/2023 at 7:02 PM, lu_alum said:

corrected previous post to state, "lost challenge"

I'd also love to see that.  I've told my wife many times that would cut down on many of these idiotic challenges.  I've also said the same thing for years on the swing appeal play in baseball.  If the batter merely flinches his hands, the catcher wants an appeal to the base ump.  If the base ump says no swing, I think it should be another ball added to the count.  That would cut down on that.  Keep the match/game moving!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, forkemaz said:

They should add a 4 point shot that'll fix it

Aren't they experimenting with this in the G-League? It's actually not a bad idea, on top of adding more points to the scoreboard it alters floor spacing and creates new offensive opportunities of all types. Similarly, major rule changes in wrestling need to not only make the scores look better, but fundamentally improve the mechanics of the sport to create more action. 

It's a challenge for all sports though, our collective attention spans are growing shorter and we constantly expect games/matches to be a highlight reel of big moments, like it's a video game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 point shot would be from half court or something? 

As far as going to 3 point takedowns, I'm not sure I like that.  

The riding time change is good in my opinion. 

3 point near fall is also a good change.   I don't like the 4 point near fall. 

But I'm a codger and like the old ways.  

I'm still not sure how I feel about 2 point takedown for freestyle.   I also don't like unlimited ankle lace scoring.  But there you go. 

mspart

 

  • Fire 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3-point takedown and riding time change should eliminate 95% of the 2-2 and 3-3 overtime matches…. Not a bad thing.

I’d like to see stalling in referee’s position give the offended wrestler a point and option to go neutral (no additional escape point) or stay in current position. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Rankings

  • College Commitments

    Edyn Hartman

    Deer Valley, Arizona
    Class of 2024
    Committed to Waldorf (Women)
    Projected Weight: 101

    Alona Castro

    Warden, Washington
    Class of 2024
    Committed to Waldorf (Women)
    Projected Weight: 101

    Alaina Kempen

    Cadott, Wisconsin
    Class of 2024
    Committed to Waldorf (Women)
    Projected Weight: 136

    Lily Schultz

    Gallatin, Montana
    Class of 2024
    Committed to Waldorf (Women)
    Projected Weight: 143
×
×
  • Create New...