Scouts Honor

who is blaming goldberg? im blaming waltz

this just in govt workers not to have anyone else in their contacts!! GOOD fire them all

dont know.. but i think this does lol

is that better or worse than a congressman/woman/senator doing the same?

white house has tapped Musk to investigate it

yeah, whoopty do for all the people hamas attacked who were protesting

i have video if you like

so we are stopping funding to hamas and syria and lebanon and egypt and jordan....as well?

please give us a history lesson not a histrionics lesson though

if only isreal could be exterminated, right?

so if trump comes out and says he 'is deeply concerned' you would be ok?

like you did the last 4 years?

i dont hate biden, well maybe a little. i hate the people he put around himself, the people who were actually doing all the stuff

you mean thanks to all the free air time

man, you know us so well!! lol

I asked Grok about it Based on available reports, the leaked details of the U.S. military strikes on Houthi targets in Yemen, which surfaced in a Signal group chat inadvertently including journalist Jeffrey Goldberg, contained sensitive operational information. The specifics mentioned include discussions among senior Trump administration officials—such as Vice President JD Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and National Security Adviser Michael Waltz—about the impending strikes. The chat reportedly revealed operational details such as intended targets, the types of weapons the U.S. planned to deploy, and the sequencing of the attacks. These strikes, executed on March 15, 2025, targeted Iran-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen. The messages also included real-time updates and congratulatory notes as the strikes unfolded, with one official, Michael Waltz, praising the effort minutes after the strikes hit, alongside emojis of a U.S. flag, fist, and fire. While the exact targets (e.g., specific locations or facilities) were not universally detailed across all sources, the inclusion of such operational specifics in an unsecured chat was described as a significant security lapse, potentially compromising military secrecy and personnel safety. The White House acknowledged the authenticity of the chat, and investigations into how it was leaked are ongoing ?? this says the chat 'reportedly' revealed operational details. You're right to point out the "reportedly" qualifier. That term reflects the nature of the available information, which comes from secondary sources like news reports rather than a direct, verified leak of the chat itself. As of now, no public primary source (like the full chat transcript) has been released, so the exact details remain somewhat speculative. What’s confirmed is that the Signal group chat, intended for senior Trump administration officials, accidentally included journalist Jeffrey Goldberg, leading to the exposure of sensitive discussions about the March 15, 2025, U.S. strikes on Houthi targets in Yemen. News outlets, such as The Atlantic and Semafor, indicate that the chat contained operational specifics—things like intended targets, weapon types, and attack sequencing—along with real-time updates and reactions. However, without the raw chat logs, the precise wording and full scope of what was leaked are filtered through journalistic interpretation, hence the "reportedly."

so you saw these plans?

why do you not like the idea of getting rid of GOVT waste?

oh so thats it they are trying to save people by burning up teslas...

i have a new idea for elon

leftists: Trump and Elon got into politics to get rich and steal your money. me: um no... they started Doge to stop democrats from stealing my money

does he stipulate 10% for the big guy too?

someone tried/did butcher innocent palestinians

i have looked at what he posted... doesn't look classified...