scourge165

NOPE! Can't use the IAEA reports Scout! When I used them as a source to show THEY said they Iran WAS following the agreement, you dismissed it, remember? It SOUNDS like you pretty much just believe them when it behooves you and you dismiss their claims when it does not. Go run back to Twitter and figure out how to reconcile how you can both use the IAEA as a source NOW but dismiss it as a Source in 2018? https://www.armscontrol.org/blog/2018-06-08/iaea-report-confirms-irans-compliance-jcpoa?utm_source=chatgpt.com

So...AGAIN, you'll need to have this argument with the Trump administration who said in 2018 that Iran was upholding their behalf of.... what I guess you believe is an agreement that...doesn't exist? LOL...alright Scout!

On some issues... he's definitely like a couple other posters on here who will take someone who follows Hassan, the actual tanking, communist defender on the far left. He's just the other side of the coin from Scout on SOME of these issues.

Oh Jesus Jimmy/Scout, are you capable of independent thought? THEY HAVE BEEN SAYING THIS MY ENTIRE LIFETIME. You claim to be this educated, comfortable, retired...informed person(which...I don't think anyone is buying, at least on the last one). But you're really deferring from our Military Intelligence and deferring to Mossad? How many times do you fall for this? They've been claiming this SINCE THE LATE 70's! But now you just blindly defer to Mossad? Ok, then get rid of Tulsi. She's not doing her job. -Of course, AGAIN, going back to the original point...it is just purely hypocritical to claim Iran does not follow their obligations when the TRUMP administration said they were in 2018 when they pulled out of the agreement. THAT was my argument and you're just arguing based on what? BOTH Trump administrations are right? Then you must really not believe them at all anymore, right? https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2011/1108/Imminent-Iran-nuclear-threat-A-timeline-of-warnings-since-1979/Earliest-warnings-1979-84

Red... I can't take you seriously on this issue anymore than I can Scout/Jimmy. It's "150% false," to say Iranian people support Israel over the regime? When did you travel to Iran, how did you speak to these people? Because if you're talking about ALL these Middle Eastern people you speak to, and you've spoken to a lot of Iranians, I would be SHOCKED if you've spoken to 1 IN 10 that's been more supportive of the Iranian Govt unles you're going to tell me you've traveled to Iran(and I'd think you'd mention that). Also, the 'trust me, people are saying,' is about as Trump-ish as you can get. You can look at the numbers which are ALWAYS going to skew in FAVOR of the Ayatollah as people are so scared of their secret police or reprisals for speaking out against their own Govt'... You can hate your leader...but right NOW you can write whatever the hell you want about him. You can go protest and they're not going to take them, beat them, maiming and VERY possibly killing them. We may get arrested for such a protest. The Glib nature in which you just throw Iran in with "that region" or "the Middle East," as if there's nothing differentiating them is....well, it's Scout/Jimmy-esque.

Ok... so then just according to Scout, ANYONE who doesn't absolutely adhere to ever right wing talking point is a troll? I definitely had you pegged as a moderate liberal, but also definitely not a troll.

Ok...so you think Mike Lee was "playing word games" when he said this is what "Marxist" have coming to them while showing a picture of the crazy right winger shooting Democrats and then make a "Nightmare on Waltz street," Joke? Cool. That's just... "word games."

Yeah, I guess, it was really hard to gauge Askren back then. I remember he lost to the kid from Minnesota(just...blanking on the name now, but he was a 4X undefeated National Champ at Augsburg, he went there because he wanted to play Football also). That kid was probably a top 3-5 overall recruit AND older, but it just wasn't competitive. But Askren just kept getting better. A guy like Hendricks(Johnny) beat him badly(Again, going off memory) as a Jr going into his Sr year and then by the end of their Sr year, it was a 6-5 match. That may be after the last ranking or too late to really impact it, and it kinda follows the Mesenbrink trajectory.

That's just insane. He's...EASILY the greatest actor of this generation. I don't know why his style of preparing for a role would detract from it, but remember when he tapped his plastic eye with that sharp knife? That was a thin layer and he had to train himself to keep his eye open. That's just ONE of dozens of anecdotes that sticks out that adds so much to role. The dude's weird, he's EASILY the greatest actor in history IMO. At LEAST the last 30 years. Has he been in a bad role? I don't think you can find a list without DDL near the top if not at the top of greatest actors EVER. Tom Cruise was great... before he just basically took the same role in every movie the last 30 years(A Few Good Men was great for example...though even there, that was just the non-action lawyer role which he then meshed with the firm and then went to over the top action movies...which is fine, but I can't get past the scientology stuff). Anyway, he's not in the same group as Daniel Day Lewis. More people have seen Tom Cruise movies, they've been ore successful, though if that's the metric, the sister in the Godfather, Adriana in Rocky would be one of the "top" Female actors of all-time and Harrison Ford would be the "best" Male star of all-time.

Please tell me this is coherent to someone else? "well, there definitely is a troll on this forum who SAID he voted for trump..." Anyone understand how this...apparent Trump voter who is actually a leftist( sort of like your claim the Minnesota shooter was actually a liberal with a Democrat contact list is) has to do with a US Senator who mocked the deaths and joked about it? Really... someone help me understand this one (not you Scout, I'm sure you'll change the topic into some whataboutism). You don't actually understand what "word games" are, do ya sport?

Yes, those 14 cases in ENTIRELY different scenarios since 1988... in somehow in some of your feeble minds means...hell, the Cop could have "changed lanes," which would require backing over him. LOL... just need to keep pointing out the hypocrisy.

THIS is the more ignorant part of this post. Most of my Family is in Law Enforcement. On the two sides, 6 Uncles, among Cousins in the various agencies and including MPs, it's ~12(I don't know if one is retired yet). But yeah, thinking someone driving an UNMARKED can pull a gun because someone LEGALLY takes a picture of their license plate...can ONLY mean I hate Cops. Again, how the bootlicking on the right have gotten insane. The constitution and you're rights... only works if it suits your argument, eh? LOL... again, not surprised by the hypocrisy.

Great. You went back to 1988 to conjure up vastly different circumstances to try and overstate the threat a Cop faces and SOMEHOW justify pulling a gun on a NON-TRAFFIC stop and perfectly legal, constitutionally protected action. These are just SOME of the jobs most several TIMES more dangerous than being a Cop.

Well... I don't know why they'd be persona non-grata away from their athletic circle, but... ok. Not really the main point. I said it's obviously not that simple... but I won't be able to understand.

Not really interesting at this point when we know that's not true.

I don't know man... I don't get it. I would think if a Dr molested me, I would beat the hell out of him, but it's obviously not that simple. Penn State, I got nothing there. Seeing a kid in the shower is... just instant and undeniable.

"Any other explanation is not realistic?" A-Again, he doesn't need ANY explanation, what he's doing is objectively legal and protected 1st amendment activity. B-If that's a State Vehicle, it's entirely possible he wanted information about who was driving for any number of reasons, the most obvious being to file a complaint. And it's clear the guy KNOWS he's in the wrong given how quickly he jumps back into his car and is out of there. But you actually have some takes that are SO stupid that...he could have "backed up to change lanes." Because that's normal driving and legal!

Ok... so you don't believe in the 1st amendment. Got it. The people who carry the little constitution to show how much they love their Country, they just piss on it time and time again when they continue to justify eroding the rights of those you don't agree with. -In public -Filming Both explicitly and adjudicated to be LEGAL 1st Amendment PROTECTED speech, but you think it's justified to point a gun at a guy at him for that? That's...certainly AN opinion. Lining up so consistently with the right's blatant hypocrisy here.

Yup! And there are 4 or 5 on here who are also saying he's actually a leftist who...for some reason voted for Trump. But I'm indifferent about the trolls on social media and more disturbed by the US Senator. You can't really play word games with that one...

??? LOL...not even talking about Trump here. Talking about what a clown you are. So... I guess that's your big boy way of saying you really have nothing when it comes to me being "woke," or ANY time I've defended "terrorists?" Cool. I'm going to go back to utilizing the ignore feature Scout/Jimmy.

I would THINK if they haven't gotten it under control by now... the update would have been even worse. Staph for nearly a month running rampant? I'm just trying to understand based on the updates, but it seems to like staph was bad, it was everywhere (being in the type of shape he was in only made it worse as he probably waited longer to go than most) and that caused the damage and now he needs to recover and exhibit some signs that he can survive a transplant or respond to treatmen. But that's my very uneducated interpretation of everything I've read.

Better. Now just go a step further and acknowledge Iran is really NOTHING like Iraq, Afghanistan, Egypt, Jordan, Syria...other than they're brown and mostly Muslim (after the Ayatollah took the most prominent Jew, hung him, left him in the street as a sign to the other Jews to get out in '79)... As for Regime change, that's mostly for the Iranian people, but I'd sure as hell be juuust fine with the US helping them out. You just keep talking about "that region" like there's NO difference... AND you act like MOST of those theocratic countries are... just a different culture, but they don't want to force their Religion on you(When ALL evidence point to the contrary including polling). Saudia Arabia, Jordan, Egypt, Palestine, between 70 and 80% CONSISTENTLY say they believe in Apostasy... Now in THAT poll, they didn't even include Iranian people because...it's just too dangerous. An Iranian women who goes to a protest a MILD penalty is just taking an eye out, so they're going to toe the party line as often as possible and be VERY leery of questions that are critical of the Islamic Republic of Iran. And YET... So really no matter how you put it, Iran...is different. And if you're so worldly that you've talked to Iranian people...again, especially IN the US, I think you'd have to make an effort to find people who agree with you. And I think it'd be difficult.

Oh Lil Jimmy, what's cute is I'M not the one saying they were following the agreement, it was the TRUMP administrations State Department that said they were following the agreement. You DO know they have several names for it(and even people liking your post know you don't have a clue, you're a dancing monkey).

Yeah, that's just the definition of "pure ignorance." They don't want to force their Religion on others? LOL...wow. And you've spoken to Iranians and they're NO different than Muslims from the other Countries in the region? BS. 78% of Egyptians believe Sharia Law should apply to everyone, Jordan it's a parse 58%. But that you KEEP just throwing Iranians in with "people in that Region," like most American Iranians aren't here due to fleeing a brutal regime is so asinine. Please look up the white revolution. You'd be hard pressed to tell the difference between a beach or resort in California vs Iran in the 1970s. But no, they all Hate American's because...strangely enough, you really see "Muslims" ALL having the exact same ideology.

Ok... so Great White North quoted you, so you have my attention. 1-YOU whine about the insults...I don't care. But even in this post, you're not bright enough to answer my question. You're mocking him for plowing roads. I'm asking you...if you're capable, to articulate why YOU think that's an insult? 2-I'm a "wokester terrorist loving wingers?" WTF are you talking about? -Show me a terrorist I've defended. -"Winger" is used as a pejorative for RIGHT wingers you moron. -What about me is "woke?" Can you use your words here? @GreatWhiteNorthwould you mind letting me know if he can actually respond? And @JimmySpeaks....try and get it done in one post for Christsakes. It's so obvious you and Scout are one because you both have to respond to one post with 4 incoherent posts where you dodge every question. So...just HOW am I "woke," how or when have I EVER defended a "terrorist," and...you can ignore the "winger," I don't care about that, just amusing. Can you handle this kid?