scourge165

Yup. "Shut up," is over my head...

Don't like that one? Blame Trump, not me. By the way, you quoted PART of that video in reposting Bennie Johnson, just one of the guys who took millions from Russia. Who's next? Tim Pool, Dave Rubin?

I might be inclined to bet on Kasak...but Taylor just won the National Championship and... he's a stud. Feels like the defending champ should be #1 Aside from the confusion over Ruth, just...no. You have McEnelly who pushed Starocci and Keck to the limit, scored on Starocci and he's #2. Rocco Welsh is #5? A guy who already took a 2nd as a True Freshmen? Ferrari certainly belongs in the mix, but...I don't see how you have anyone ahead of McEnelly and then Welsh at this point. I'm also confused how 1-5 is B1G and there's no Sinclair in there, but...that's not a B1G issue. Also, is Iowa really gonna waste a year of Arnold? I don't know how they avoid it unless Ferrari goes '97...which I don't know if he does if his Brother is wrestling(I don't know what's going on there). This is a BIG year for Iowa. I want to see Jordan Williams Wrestling a full 7 minutes and attacking. If he can do that, he's got MASSIVE upside.

1. Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) Founded in 1979 by John Tanton, the Federation for American Immigration Reform is a nonprofit organization based in Washington, D.C., that advocates for significant reductions in both legal and illegal immigration to the United States. FAIR's stated objectives include reducing overall immigration to 300,000 a year over a sustained period and opposing policies like birthright citizenship and the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. The organization engages in lobbying efforts and public campaigns to influence U.S. immigration policy. splcenter.org+4ballotpedia.org+4loc.gov+4bridge.georgetown.edu FAIR has been a subject of controversy. The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) has designated it as a hate group, citing its ties to white supremacist ideologies and its efforts to severely limit immigration into the United States. mediabiasfactcheck.com+1splcenter.org+1

Sure...it was a McConnell Bill(A hero of the Republicans by the way) because he appointed Lankford. Strange that the Republicans supported the Bill until Trump came out and explicitly said it'd hurt him in the election... If you don't get the bill, Trump doesn't get to run on the border.

Awe...c'mon! Make my argument for me!!!

There's no other response than "But Biden."

I don't know what you're talking about here. I didn't focus in on any wording...you're wrong. I've proven you wrong in this post and now you're just doing the 'nuh-uh, you are.' I'm not desperate, I'm just done. I pointed out the private companies Hitler did business with, I pointed out the Government run industries that he privatized, I've pointed out the likes of Friedrich Krupp and other industrialists who supported Hitler. YOUR argument is, 'but...it the National Socialist Party,' and I even addressed that. If you need to believe that Hitler, the MOST obvious example of the far right we've ever seen...is in fact not because you fall back to these lazy talking points, ok. Ignorance, unlike stupidity is a choice. Remain ignorant(though as I said earlier, I don't believe YOU believe your argument at this point).

Yes, it's a VERY common trait for socialists to come into authority and take Government runs industries and...privatize them! You're flailing here...badly. You're effectively arguing 'dictator=leftist.' I've provided ample evidence and now you're just trying to water down this debate and dumb it down. Hitler wasn't a socialist, he was on the far right.

I've addressed only the substance. You don't like the facts, so you will ignore the facts. That's...as expected.

I'll just keep repeating this and you can reconcile how an Ethnocentric Nationalist who took Government owned industries, privatized them and then worked with private industry...was a Socialist.

Please define Conservative and Progressive for me, will ya bud? Because it's NOT Democrat or Republican. How do you have such a rudimentary understanding of even the most basic terms? When one side wants to PRESERVE life in a Country as it currently exists, they are...what? When one side wants CHANGE, they are...what? Can you answer this most BASIC question?

LMFAO!!!!! wallbuilders.com! Oh god... you should not be allowed to talk about higher education any more; You've already lost this debate when you use the Barton family. Again, the Germans literally PRIVATIZED industry, banned unions and leaned on industrialists in order to thrive. I like the argument that despite Hitler emphasizing personal property rights, THIS little snippet proves he...didn't honor them' Yes...BECAUSE HE WAS A DICTATOR!! They seized all Jewish owned property and business and transferred it either to the state or to PRIVATE industry... which is PRETTY tough when you're a socialist!

This VERY sentence tells me you don't understand "Left" and "right" to begin with. It was America's CONSERVATIVE wing that was legislating segregation. You don't even know what conservative or progressive means! The PROGRESSIVES were against segregation.

LOL...dude, what are you talking about? NOBODY said he was a globalist. He was an Ethnocentric Nationalist! That...IS about as Right Wing as you can get. He also took STATE owned industries like Steel, Mining, Banking and PRIVITIZED them in an attempt to garner support from industrialists and stimulate economic growth. It was PRIVATE INDUSTRY that propelled the Nazi Party to prominence starting in 1932. He banned labor unions, he threw socialists(and communists) in Prison! That you keep arguing he was a "Socialist" in the face of ALL the evidence at this point means you KNOW you're wrong, you can't admit you're wrong, but you're going to double down and keep arguing because you don't understand where and why they were named the NAZI party and as long as you can repeat that one line...again, despite ALL historical and empirical data, you can just keep cutting and pasting that same reply! I'm honestly getting embarrassed for you. Err...but...he wasn't a Globalist and... and it says NAZI, so he was a leftist! He is the definition of "FAR RIGHT," and I really can't believe this is even being debated... It really says a lot about you that you not only don't already know this, but that you're so insecure about Hitler's politics being far "right," that you have to argue this hard. It says even more that you have to call me a Communist to begin with or assign the beliefs of Mao or Lenin to me. It's an intellectually lazy argument people who aren't capable of independent thought fall back on(sorta like calling everyone they don't like a NAZI)... but I'm pretty sure yo KNOW you're wrong here, you're just not willing to admit as much.

I can see the more direct contact now in the replay at 17:40. Originally it just looks like a glancing blow. That doesn't change my initial point though. That's just part of the sport. Fix is standing there on the edge, head down. Vito shoots a blast double. I'm not sure what you want him to do. You asked for a stoppage. You can always get a stoppage on a shot to the head. But do we ban the double? Squared stance, head down...it's just not a big deal to me.

You're talking about right after Vito gets out, it's 2-1 at that point(I think) and Vito shoots him out, right? LOL...yeah, I'm saying his head doesn't "collide directly into Daton's face." Also, there IS a stoppage when there's a hard head to head collision(just as with the eye pokes) IF the Wrestler reacts. You'd think if he shot him straight into the face there, you'd think Fix's head would snap back...or at least some reaction.

LOL...I'm going to tell you he doesn't "blast through Daton's face on this shot." I'm not going to tell you he didn't "intentionally lower" his head and shoot because...THAT'S PART OF THE SHOT. You have to lower your levels. This is basic Wrestling. I don't care about the commentary, but using this example just because the announcers said something is silly. That was nothing. I don't know what you want. To ban a blast double? You want to plant your head right in someone's chest and run through him. If the opposing Wrestler is going to drop his head...he's going to feel it. We're not playing patty cake. This is part of the sport, it's always been part of the sport. It's physical. Vito is shooting him off. I'm kinda shocked anyone would have a problem with that shot. What would you have the sport do? Have a ref determine who is going for a legitimate shot and who isn't?

Yes, I am...and thank you for again confirming that was as shallow as your thought process on Hitler's policies went! It's... honestly amusing when I've explained the origin of the "NAZI" title several times. Also, how do you not just KNOW this? You took TWO runs through College. Jesus...YES, Hitler was vehemently opposed to Socialism... I don't know what your argument is OTHER than there's NO examples of extreme right wing ideologies that are bad...and you're so ignorant, you can't wrap your head around Hitler being one of them.

Not even a little bit. I'm saying we KNOW Trump was at the Island... ergo, he'd be in the "Epstein files," but merely being present at the Island wouldn't be enough to conclude he was abusing children. I don't now how you concluded that I arrived at the "probability" of anyone's guilt. Irrespective of the Epstein files, I thought the Acosta nomination in and of itself should have been disqualifying(particularly using MAGA standards).

Another good question to be is...if Trump ISN'T in the "Epstein files," why hasn't his administration released the documents? That was a campaign promise. He said he'd do it. What reason is there not to? Because he was clearly on the Island. He was at the parties. I'm NOT saying he was raping girls there(if they were underage, it was rape, it doesn't have to be forcible)... but, he was there. I don't think this will matter though as I think this will just get chalked up to Musk being upset with Trump. Similar to how cabinet members who served under him either didn't endorse him were painted as being bitter. Guys like General Kelly or...whoever, it's a long list.

It was always known he was in the Epstein files. Just as it's known Clinton and... dozens of others are. Just being in the files isn't evidence he was raping children... I am still baffled how Trump trying to appoint Acosta in 2017 (maybe 2018) wasn't the end for Trump though. You look at ALL the extrapolations people make to connect the Clintons to things. They know X amount of people who've died and therefore, they must all be behind it. But nobody made this VERY clean and straight line connection to Trump trying to put the guy who got Epstein a non-prosecution agreement...into his cabinet? You had a massive prosecution in process against Epstein. You had witnesses prepared to testify and he came in and gave Epstein a deal with very little jail time(only jail) and he got work release and then house arrest, but he did this BEHIND the backs of the prosecutors and he didn't make the victims aware and the most egregious part was he gave blanket immunity for all conspirators, both KNOWN and UNKNOWN. Then Trump...who was friends with Epstein(yeah, I know, he had a falling out...which seems to happen a lot as evidence by this thread)... But NOBODY from the right questioned why would Trump give the guy who gave everyone he DIDN'T know about a pass? That meant if we DO find out that lets say Bill Clinton, he was down there and he raped a 14-year-old girl, he also has immunity? I'm just using a Democrat as an example so people will see how fk up that is. Granting full immunity "any potential co-conspirators," just ended that ENTIRE investigation. So maybe it's C. My GUESS would be there are SO many names of prominent people who are on the Epstein files, but not evidence they actually did anything. You can prove Trump flew on the...Lolita Express or whatever, he went to the Island, but sooo many people went there. It's probably like the Diddy parties(Which...Trump also attended). But just being AT the parties doesn't mean you were in the back rooms doing the "freak offs," or whatever the hell was going on there. So basically my guess is it was mutually assured destruction without being able to differentiate between guilt and who was present.

He's grossly misrepresenting the data. That's why he's not going to show you. There have been more employers who are dropping a 4 year degree as a requirement in favor of experience and because they're simply trying to find employees. A College degree is still incredibly valuable on average when looking at long term earning potential as a whole(this is likely where he'd compare a skilled welder with someone who went to get a...Philosophy degree as "proof" that's not true, but on balance, it is). I'm not even sure what his point is though. Does he think people who DIDN'T go to College are MORE ready or...what? He also went to College twice. Seems like there was a reason for that(meaning... he did it for his career/earning potential, not attacking his intellect, though if you think Hitler is far left, that surely raises the question).

I don't think this is some new phenomenon. I think it's always been like this. I think one big thing is you have 18-year-old kids who come from conservative backgrounds(just part of it) and they get to College and they learn History and there is an...overcorrection. They learn some ugly truths, but they learn them about the US first and there is very much an "America-Bad," reaction. They used modern morality and apply it to the past... which is always... stupid. It's how you get people who want Lincoln statutes taken down. I also think like anything, you see a lot of group think. And finally, I think in MOST cases, you have a minority of students who get a majority of the spotlight. You read Marx and Engels and you think... that makes sense...and it does in theory. And then as you matriculate through, you realize it's only in theory(most of the time) and you abandon that. I don't think it has anything to do with "indoctrination," and I don't think the College students protesting who are pro-Hamas represent a real significant portion of the College students... and I think they should have mostly been arrested. Not for chanting or protesting, but the ones who wouldn't leave. I also found the students who tried to dictate how the Universities invested their money to be... honestly just amusing. I don't know WTF they thought they were, but... I just laughed at that one.

I like how the entire basis for your argument Hitler isn't the epitome of a right wing extremists is just...'nuh-uh.' You can keep talking about my "leftist" professors all you'd like, he wasn't. It's a fact, he banned the socialist parties, he hated communists, I've given you numerous reasons and you are just not capable of understanding it. And that's fine. Hitler was a Nationalist, Ethnocentric, Authoritarian. You act like I'm calling you that(though...you have called me a Communist despite the fact that I've never uttered a positive word about communists, Mao or the like) but you can't accept Hitler was on the opposite end of the spectrum as Stalin and Mao. Cool. Neither represent ANYTHING we've EVER had as a form of leadership in the United States, but this is still an important point for you for...some reason I guess. You're wrong, but you're confidently wrong...so that's something I suppose.