Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 1/26/2023 at 1:18 AM, PortaJohn said:

This Lee vs RBY thing has reached an all time level of stupidity.  A) Both Brands and Cael have shown throughout their coaching careers that duals are meaningless B)  RBY would beat Spencer Lee.  Yes.  He would.  Hes bigger, stronger, longer reach, and much faster.

Expand  

Bigger?  Yeah.  Stronger?  I doubt it, especially grip strength.  Longer reach?  Yep.  Faster?  Yes, especially backing up.
The way you make it sound, Bravo-Young ought to be dominating everybody, pins, mostly first period, kind of like... Spencer Lee. 

Will we see it?  Very doubtful this year.  Maybe somewhere down the road...

  • Fire 3
Posted
  On 1/26/2023 at 3:53 AM, dragit said:

Not better. 

 

Expand  

Jay Borschel is probably a better example.  He was a Brands recruit.  Perry was a Zalesky recruit and had finished 2nd and 3rd under Z.  Borschel was more over 157 and more of a Brands product than Perry.

Posted

Okay @Wrestleknownothing here are my final predictions if you are still keeping track:

125: Lee by fall over Steen 6-0

133: Bravo-Young by decision over Teske 6-3

141: Woods by decision over Bartlett 9-3

149: Van Ness by decision over Murin 9-6

157: Haines by decision over Siebrecht 9-9

165: Kennedy by decision over Facundo 12-9

174: Starocci by decision over Brands 12-12

184: Brooks by decision over Assad 12-15

197: Dean by decision over Warner 12-18

285: Cassioppi by decision over Kerkvliet 15-18, Nittany Lions win by three 

  • Fire 2
Posted
  On 1/26/2023 at 6:20 AM, fishbane said:

Jay Borschel is probably a better example.  He was a Brands recruit.  Perry was a Zalesky recruit and had finished 2nd and 3rd under Z.  Borschel was more over 157 and more of a Brands product than Perry.

Expand  

I gave both in my post.  Both were an "NCAA champ over 157 since the Brands Bros took over," which was the statement in question.  Perry twice. 

Borschel of course couldn't have been more Brands - he went through the whole Va Tech ordeal with him.

And Perry, in addition to meeting the definition in question, is a nice feather in the Brands coaching cap.  A lengthy film was made about the hurdle he cleared between his 2-3 under Zalesky and his 1-1 under Brands -- particularly that first "1," a big upset over Hendricks.

  • Fire 1
Posted
  On 1/26/2023 at 4:30 PM, 1032004 said:
I feel like everyone is just assuming Spencer pins Steen, but I wouldn't be completely shocked if he didn't

Gary is a good kid but he’s a 118 wrestling against an exceptional top wrestler.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

I'm well aware of how Lee has been wrestling recently but it was only a month ago when he couldn't pin Charlie Farmer.

And the last time he wrestled in the Iowa-PSU dual in 2020 he only managed a tech of Brandon Meredith (interestingly in that same season he also pinned Liam Cronin in under a minute).

Posted
  On 1/26/2023 at 6:46 AM, flyingcement said:

Okay @Wrestleknownothing here are my final predictions if you are still keeping track:

125: Lee by fall over Steen 6-0

133: Bravo-Young by decision over Teske 6-3

141: Woods by decision over Bartlett 9-3

149: Van Ness by decision over Murin 9-6

157: Haines by decision over Siebrecht 9-9

165: Kennedy by decision over Facundo 12-9

174: Starocci by decision over Brands 12-12

184: Brooks by decision over Assad 12-15

197: Dean by decision over Warner 12-18

285: Cassioppi by decision over Kerkvliet 15-18, Nittany Lions win by three 

Expand  

From 18-18 in the pre-season to 18-15 Iowa to 18-15 PSU. I love it.

Thursday Update:

This time with just the most recent pick by each (25) sayer of soothes.

image.png.56feb02dc1948dc048b80af23f877b77.png

 

Will He or Won't He?

RBY is no longer the unanimous choice at 133. I'm not sayin', I'm just sayin'. 

Give the people what they want.

image.png.e44e4fc9b0dba53adde34e0b2019c817.png


No ne predictions out of either the PSU boards or HR.

  • Fire 1

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
  On 1/26/2023 at 4:49 PM, 1032004 said:

I'm well aware of how Lee has been wrestling recently but it was only a month ago when he couldn't pin Charlie Farmer.

And the last time he wrestled in the Iowa-PSU dual in 2020 he only managed a tech of Brandon Meredith (interestingly in that same season he also pinned Liam Cronin in under a minute).

Expand  

I will see your data point and raise you a data point. In 2020 his TF over Meredith was the sixth of six straight TF's. Now he is on a seven match pinfall streak. I think he wants to keep that streak alive and to do it at PSU would be delicious for him.

Would he be so bold as to release Steen if the TF is close, but he can't quite get the pinfall?

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
  On 1/26/2023 at 4:58 PM, Wrestleknownothing said:

From 18-18 in the pre-season to 18-15 Iowa to 18-15 PSU. I love it.

Expand  

Wait a minute, how many times can we change our minds and re-submit?  Is this still open at the half time break?  Is it only our last prediction that counts?  And most important, what does the winner get?  

.

Posted
  On 1/26/2023 at 6:20 AM, fishbane said:

Jay Borschel is probably a better example.  He was a Brands recruit.  Perry was a Zalesky recruit and had finished 2nd and 3rd under Z.  Borschel was more over 157 and more of a Brands product than Perry.

Expand  

your argument is that perry doesn't count because he couldn't get it done under the old coach, but beat the guy who beat him 9x under brands?

  • Fire 1
Posted
  On 1/26/2023 at 5:06 PM, ionel said:

Wait a minute, how many times can we change our minds and re-submit?  Is this still open at the half time break?  Is it only our last prediction that counts?  And most important, what does the winner get?  

Expand  

Page 1 me has all the answers.

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
  On 1/14/2023 at 12:05 AM, Wrestleknownothing said:

One more thought.

Feel free to change your minds as many times as you like in the next two weeks. Go ahead and share your predictions now, but don't feel locked in since there will be many more data points to consider between now and then.

Expand  

 

  On 1/26/2023 at 5:17 PM, Wrestleknownothing said:

Page 1 me has all the answers.

Expand  

so ... I can resubmit again on the 27th any time up thru say the last second of the 3rd period of HWT.  Guess the danger of waiting too late into that third period would be an unexpected pinfall.  😮 not that I have any idea what that is

.

Posted
  On 1/26/2023 at 5:32 PM, ionel said:

 

so ... I can resubmit again on the 27th any time up thru say the last second of the 3rd period of HWT.  Guess the danger of waiting too late into that third period would be an unexpected pinfall.  😮 not that I have any idea what that is

Expand  

I'm waiting till Saturday morning for my final prediction in case anybody gets their lawyers involved. 

  • Fire 1
Posted
  On 1/26/2023 at 5:07 PM, uncle bernard said:

your argument is that perry doesn't count because he couldn't get it done under the old coach, but beat the guy who beat him 9x under brands?

Expand  

I don't recall making that argument, nor saying that Perry didn't count.  Borschel is the better example to refute the statement that Iowa/Brands hasn't produced a champion over 157lbs.  More over 157, more recent, coached exclusively by Brands.  

Putting number on the statement it essentially said Iowa/Brands produced 0 champs in the top 5 weights since Brands took over (2006).  If Perry were the only exception it would only require a slight change to the statement.  No champs in the top 4 weights since 2006 would be true or No champs in the top 5 weights since 2008.  Borschel is also an exception. So to make the statement true it would have to be no champs in the top 3 weights since 2006 or no champs in the top 5 weights since 2010.  One weight up and two years more recent.  

I don't think the best example of Brands "producing" a champion is taking a finalist who already had beaten an NCAA champion to a title.  Perry probably wins a title at some point under Zalesky.  Maybe you argue that he wouldn't have beaten Hendricks, but they were close before Brands took over.  Two years before they wrestled three times and they were all close 1-2 point matches, overtime, ect.  Even if you have Hendricks as a prohibitive favorite (90% chance of winning) after 6 matches it's only a coin flip that Hendricks wins them all.  At some point Perry gets one by him.  Heck even Askren was 1-7 against Pendleton.  Brands deserves some credit for getting the best match out of Perry on the biggest stage, but not as much as getting Borschel to a title.

The sentiment from the original statement still have some underlying truth.  Iowa has struggled to produce champions at the heavier weights under Brands.  They have had success at 165 and 174 under Brands consistently producing title contenders.  Perry, Borschel, Kemerer, and Marinelli were all legitimate title contenders.  They either made finals, were the 1 seed at nationals or won titles.  Warner is the only finalist Iowa has had 184-285 since 2004 and both of them were somewhat surprise finalists coming from the 6 and 10 seeds.  Their last title from the top 3 weights was Steve Mocco 20 years ago.

Posted
  On 1/26/2023 at 6:06 PM, fishbane said:

 

The sentiment from the original statement still have some underlying truth.  Iowa has struggled to produce champions at the heavier weights under Brands.  They have had success at 165 and 174 under Brands consistently producing title contenders.  Perry, Borschel, Kemerer, and Marinelli were all legitimate title contenders.  They either made finals, were the 1 seed at nationals or won titles.  Warner is the only finalist Iowa has had 184-285 since 2004 and both of them were somewhat surprise finalists coming from the 6 and 10 seeds.  Their last title from the top 3 weights was Steve Mocco 20 years ago.

Expand  

I mean...other than Penn State, this is true for all the rest of college wrestling at some weight range, or most weight ranges.

You are a voice of reason. - @Paul158

Posted
  On 1/26/2023 at 5:32 PM, ionel said:

 

so ... I can resubmit again on the 27th any time up thru say the last second of the 3rd period of HWT.  Guess the danger of waiting too late into that third period would be an unexpected pinfall.  😮 not that I have any idea what that is

Expand  

You can certainly try. I will check with management. But be warned, all of their decisions are final and arbitrary.

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
  On 1/26/2023 at 6:28 PM, Wrestleknownothing said:

You can certainly try. I will check with management. But be warned, all of their decisions are final and arbitrary.

Expand  

based on random choice or personal whim, rather than any reason or system

I would expect nothing less.  🙄

.

Posted
  On 1/26/2023 at 6:24 PM, VakAttack said:

I mean...other than Penn State, this is true for all the rest of college wrestling at some weight range, or most weight ranges.

Expand  

It's true.  There are maybe 3 programs where such criticism wouldn't be completely absurd.  Couple Iowa being one of them with the Brandses being small and the range of weights in question being at the heavy extreme, and people will read more into it than they should.

 

Back to predictions Flo posted there whiteboard war and Bray picked Iowa to win 21-12.  It's a more lopsided Iowa win than anyone predicted in this thread.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...