Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

When I spill the beans.  I always spill the beans from my confidential informants immediately.      So then can I go to some message board to spill the beans like 8 mins later…. That way my sources trust me more and give me more info later.     Naming the source is also good in this process.  
 

anyone hear about Aj Ferrari or gable going to Iowa ?

Edited by Caveira
  • Fire 1
Posted (edited)
28 minutes ago, Husker_Du said:

UPDATE:

just talked to Dresser. he's livid. said Paniro is in zero trouble. 

Zero trouble with Dresser or zero trouble with the NCAA? 


Livid because….?

Not sure how he went from never wrestling again to being in zero trouble in 20 minutes 

Edited by Idaho
  • Haha 1

Sponsored by INTERMAT ⭐⭐⭐⭐

Posted
4 minutes ago, Idaho said:

Zero trouble with Dresser or zero trouble with the NCAA? 


Livid because….?

Not sure how he went from never wrestling again to being in zero trouble in 20 minutes 

You never had a good 20 minutes before?

  • Fire 1
  • Haha 2

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted (edited)

I mean the charges seem very real.  Maybe Dresser was already aware of the specifics and possibly told a deal would be reached?

Edited by 1032004
Posted
12 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

I mean the charges seem very real.  Maybe Dresser was already aware of the specifics and possibly told a deal would be reached?

Not saying this isn’t the facts, could be why Swederski has said publicly that he will be at 149 this year. 

Posted

 

STORY - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT

Defendant: PANIRO JOHNSON

CASE NO.: 2023009066

Page 3 of 4

e) Wagering by individuals under 21 years of age

In early 2023, an investigation initiated by agents with the Iowa Division of Criminal Investigation (DCI) uncovered evidence of PANIRO JOHNSON conducting illicit wagering activities on the Draftings sportsbook platform. PANIRO JOHNSON was a wrestler at Iowa State University during the 2021-2022 and 2022-2023 wrestling seasons

PANIRO JOHNSON engaged in a scheme with THESHA FREEMAN enabling JOHNSON to disguise his identity and manipulate online/mobile transactions in order to create the appearance that sports wager transactions conducted by JOHNSON were made by FREEMAN.

This deception enabled PANIRO JOHNSON to conceal his unlawful gambling activities from law

enforcement and other regulatory bodies.

His actions contravened various legal and regulatory frameworks, including:

A)

Underage Gambling: PANIRO JOHNSON placed wagers while underage, in violation of Iowa's gambling laws. He employed a proxy account registered in the name of an individual who was over the legal age of 21.

JOHNSON does not turn 21 until 2024.

B)

Violation of licensed Sportsbook User Terms and Conditions: PANIRO JOHNSON'S wagers on DraftKings also violated the platform's User's Terms, as well as rules and regulations administered by the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission. DraftKings explicitly prohibits individuals from signing up for an account while underage or

utilizing the service under another's name.

C)

Breach of University and NCAA Policies: PANIRO JOHNSON'S use of an account associated with a non-athlete individual allowed him to circumvent scrutiny and sidestep university and NCAA policies regarding student-athlete sports wagering conduct. By using the identity of another, JOHNSON was able to avoid detection and the potential consequences of participation in prohibited activity.

D)

Unfair Wagering and Conflict of Interest: PANIRO JOHNSON placed bets on Iowa State University athletic events, including games and events sponsored by the NCAA and university. This raised concerns regarding unfair wagering advantages, potential access to insider knowledge of athletic participants, and the potential for collusion-

related activities.

Tax Implications: PANIRO JOHNSON'S fraudulent activities also shielded him from potential state and federal tax implications. By concealing his identity during his sports wagering transactions, any tax responsibilities

would fall on the stand-in's name listed on the account.

When placing wagers on the DraftKings platform, an individually unique "Bet Ticket ID" digital record is generated. This number is utilized by Draftings to distinguish one wager from all others. Each wager placed by JOHNSON generated a "Bet Ticket ID" digital record. Each "Bet Ticket ID" digital record identified below correspond to a specific timestamped wager placed by JOHNSON. The "Bet Ticket ID's" listed are not all inclusive of JOHNSON's sports wagering activity; however, they all meet the following conditions:

  1. Wagers routinely and consistently placed from PANIRO JOHNSON's personal iPhone.
  2. Wagering transactions that required possession of PANIRO JOHNSON'S protected iPhone to unlock and access his

Draitkings account using a specific username and password.

3) Corresponded to PANIRO JOHNSON'S known locations, including his university residence and areas

 

  • Fire 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

The ultimate victimless crime. 

??? so no one hurt by insider tradingeither?

2BPE 11/17/24 SMC

Posted
7 minutes ago, ionel said:

??? so no one hurt by insider tradingeither?

Insider trading laws in the US are different than they are elsewhere, and are a little weird. And, yes, sometimes victimless.

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
2 hours ago, Mr. PeanutButter said:

Dayum

I wish I had that kind of money in college (even now would be nice, too) 

My first thought was he must be really good and just keeps betting all his winnings.

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Ohio Elite said:

Good lord lol.  I hope he still gets a chance to wrestle.

I don’t on the NCAA level. He bet 25 times on Iowa state events. I’d see an argument for reinstatement if all his bets were other schools, but he should be done. The rules on gambling are made very clear from day one of compliance meetings. He also knew it was wrong, which is why he concealed his identity. 

Edited by billyhoyle
  • Fire 1
Posted
48 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

Insider trading laws in the US are different than they are elsewhere, and are a little weird. And, yes, sometimes victimless.

The victim is the counter party to the trade/bet. 

Posted
1 minute ago, billyhoyle said:

I don’t on the NCAA level. He bet 25 times on Iowa state events. I’d see an argument for reinstatement if all his bets were other schools, but he should be done. The rules on gambling are made very clear from day one of compliance meetings. He also knew it was wrong, which is why he concealed his identity. 

I think a year suspension would be plenty.

Posted
1 minute ago, 1032004 said:

I think a year suspension would be plenty.

They just made the rules notably less draconian for gambling. An exception is gambling on your own school, which is still a permanent ban. There’s zero excuse to do it. 

Posted
31 minutes ago, billyhoyle said:

The victim is the counter party to the trade/bet. 

Not according to US law. In the US insider trading is about theft of information and/or betrayal of trust, not theft of money from the market. 

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
3 hours ago, Idaho said:

Zero trouble with Dresser or zero trouble with the NCAA? 


Livid because….?

Not sure how he went from never wrestling again to being in zero trouble in 20 minutes 

One possibility is that he made all these bets last year before he was enrolled as a full time student and an NCAA Student athlete.  That wouldn't be exactly zero trouble - he'd still have the criminal charge to contend with, but I don't believe the NCAA could suspend him for that.

1283 would be a lot of bets to place between August/September 2022-May 2023.

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, fishbane said:

One possibility is that he made all these bets last year before he was enrolled as a full time student and an NCAA Student athlete.  That wouldn't be exactly zero trouble - he'd still have the criminal charge to contend with, but I don't believe the NCAA could suspend him for that.

1283 would be a lot of bets to place between August/September 2022-May 2023.

Expanding on this the criminal complaint says that the criminal conduct happened "on or between the dates 8/25/2021 and 10/31/2022."

https://htv-prod-media.s3.amazonaws.com/files/redacted-johnson-64c995095e416.pdf

Edited by fishbane

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...