scourge165

Hey, @Tripnsweep and @VakAttack... no matter how many times you point out this was the Federal Government, they're still going to keep pushing the "it was the Governor" angle. This is what happens when you don't understand basic civics.

Just pointing out your hypocrisy, that's all! Trump=Not to blame because he didn't "fire a shot." Biden=ALSO didn't fire any shots, but he's to blame for two wars. Got it. So you don't pretend to be consistent. I appreciate your honesty, even if it's accidental.

Ok....so it's Trump's fault we're closer to WWIII than we have been since the early 60s? Gotcha! I don't even know what you're attempting to say with that last sentence. "incontinent maybe?" Yes, he may be incontinent. Doesn't seem relevant here. They make adult diapers for that... and we have some indication he utilizes them, but that's really not the point here, is it?

Yeah, we're past that sparky. I quite literally said, "I'll assume you're talking about their leadership," in my original post. No clue what the "snow plow," or "red lobster" is in reference to, but I'm sure it's quite clever. So... you're NOT going to address how they're both not serious and so serious we need to take out their leadership and their nuclear program? For the THIRD time now...and I get reading comprehension is SO very difficult for you, but I've said I DO NOT blame Trump for this and I wouldn't blame him if he chooses to escalate. YOU on the other hand, you DO blame Biden for the Wars that took place under him. So...just curious if you have a cogent reason for why there is such a disconnect. And see if you can respond all in one post. It's tiresome having to see multiple response where you say nothing and then I have to respond re-asking the same questions that you continue to dodge.

It's funny, I'm just trying to reconcile this. Biden=His fault for the Russian-Ukrainian war. Likewise, his fault for the Palestine-Israel conflict Trump=NOT to blame for the escalation and the Iranian-Israel conflict they're actively taking part in. -Iran didn't live up to their obligations...AFTER we pulled out of the deal we made with them? Yup...it's the left that is inconstant here!

Ok... that's about as much depth as I expected. 'Just cuz I said!' Sound logic. But alright. They're not serious people, ie, they're not a threat, pack up and go home, right? Nothing to worry about from people who "aren't serious people."

Why do you need 4 posts to address one post? I didn't "almost" make a connection, you said "The Iranian people." I gave you the benefit of the doubt and said it was their leadership... but given you struggle so badly to communicate, I asked you to clarify. Ok... but it IS Biden's fault that Palestine attacked Israel and Russia attacked the Ukraine? That is some genuine smooth brain logic there!

Ok, so are you going to address this point? Where did THAT come from? Or THIS point... A year of negotiating between the US and Russia and the US saying exactly what Russia would do with regard to propaganda, Russia doing that and that is on Biden, but again, you don't think Trump is to blame for THIS(which again, I DO agree with, I just want to know how you, as a big boy can reconcile to those two positions). And then finally, if they're "not a serious people," then... why are we worried about them developing nuclear weapons or funding terrorist groups?

Says the guy who somehow blames Biden for the two Wars that started under his administration, but DOESN'T blame Trump for this conflict! Still waiting for how you concluded that I was saying "Russia wouldn't have attacked with Trump in office." IIRC, Trump was going to end these warS on Day1, right? These aren't "leftist" talking points, these are actual right wing arguments and things Trump ran on and his base echoed.

Yes... after the fact as you were once again being intentionally misleading. And is that a serious answer? The United States pulls out of the Iranian deal, but... since there were other countries, no reason to worry about the World's Super Power...and the Country that then took out your top military leader? You're really equating the United States with the other Countries in the treaty? That's...again, just disingenuous.

Please explain the mental gymnastics you had to do in order to come to that conclusion? Me? Nothing. The right who blamed Biden for the Russian's invading? Apparently... everything. "The Iranians?" They're "aren't serious people?" That's awfully strange we'd be worried about them developing a nuclear weapon then, no? (Pst...this is why you're better off just repeating others talking points). The Iranian people were actually the most liberal before the Ayatollah. You'd be well served to learn a bit of History. But given that trying to understand what you're saying is like trying to decode what someone who was "gifted" the joy of an extra chromosome, I'll have to assume you mean their leadership. Which...again, still makes absolutely no sense. If they're not serious, the US need not be involved in defending Israel, in their nuclear program, in any of it... by YOUR logic, right? Yes. It's so stupid and contradictory, that is appropriately original given the source!

Oh Jimmy... whatever you want to call me...whilst complaining about name calling, I can at LEAST make a coherent argument based on my own opinions rather than just regurgitating what others have said!

Waaaait a second. Russia attacking the Ukraine and Palestine attacking Israel was Biden's fault...but the US actively participating in the Israel-Iran conflict is NOT on Trump? I mean, I actually agree, it's not, it's just stunning the hypocrisy... particularly since YOU specifically have blamed Biden and claimed he was starting "WWIII."

Whenever @ionel or someone posts a cut and pasted sentence, you can be sure they're being dishonest. My guess would be that's from after the US pulled out of the agreement...probably long after(perhaps even this year). And now the key part... the actual source; https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/restoring-jcpoas-nuclear-limits

This is...absolutely amazing. I'm honestly not opposed to taking out the Ayatollah. I think Iran is the most Western Friendly Country in the Middle East(the people, obviously not leadership) and this COULD be a...good thing... in so much as forcing regime change is ever a good thing. But going back and saying you can't count on THEM to hold up their side of the deal when we've regularly made an about face and pulled out of the deals and THEN claiming we couldn't have access to the site that was part of the agreement we pulled out of AFTER we pulled out of... When you summarize it, it's so stupid it's hard to understand how people are this stupid.

LOL...the guy who cannot communicate a single point without reposting someone else's Tweet or a Meme!

Well... yeah, but how stupid do you have to be to go and read lines that are almost exactly the same as Hitler used to describe the Jews and not understand what you're saying? Also... it was 1990 that his WIFE said he reads a book of Hitler's speeches before bed...and he didn't really dispute it. This is how the discussions go through. 1-Thread starts by mocking the idea that the biggest DOMESTIC terrorist threat is Conservative Right Wing extremists. 2-Somewhere in there is becomes about Pol Pot 3-There's a case where an OBVIOUS right wing extremist targets democrat lawmakers. 4-People...legitimately argue the Trump voting, Pro-life guy with a list of addresses and other Wisconsin lawmakers 5-'Well, the Democrats call Trump a fascist and racist!' LOL... you get so deep into the weeds, you forget what the original thread was about.

You're conflating a lot of things, but Trump being a dictator wannabe without ANY evidence? I mean, aside from the Dictator on Day One, the "Never have to vote again," talking about running for 3rd term which I believe you dismissed as him joking and then he came back out and said, 'No, I'm serious, we're looking into options right now.' He's repeatedly talked about how he envied the power Dictators had and he's governed by himself. What is the "State of Emergency" with the European Union," with regard to trade right now? Mexico-Candada. It's a lazy, BS argument, but fine...drugs. Not how most drugs get here. China...whatever, even grand that one. The UK? The EU? That's supposed to be on Congress. And if you really want to talk about "rhetoric" they're claiming that Senator Padilla "lunged" and tried to "attack" Kristi Noem during the press conference. They're claiming he made a LEGITIMATE attempt to physically attack her RIGHT NOW as I watch on Fox News... and now Jessie Walters is asking if it makes a Man "more or less attractive," when Men Cry. Or how about just the absolute nonsense that Biden and the Democrats are communists(and Socialists because there are enough people dumb enough they don't know the difference). How often did Trump repeat that one? This righteous indignation over pointing out TRUMP'S racist ranting, authoritarian speak(and lets keep in mind, he was literally part of a plot to illegally stay in office that would have worked if Mike Pence would have gone along with it).

Well, calling all MAGA racist is wrong(if that's what they're doing). Calling TRUMP racist or saying he's using racist verbiage when it's genuinely hard to tell if Stephen Mueller was writing his speeches using some of Hitler's greatest hits on purpose or on accident are two different things. "Poisoning the blood of our people?" Calling people trying to come into this country rats and vermin. Some things you can chalk up to misspeaking. "Black jobs." The S-hole countries, the way he's talked about Puerto Rico, the Central Park 5(Jesus Christ...he called for the death penalty for kids who were BARELY teenagers).

Well...that's fair! Fanatics NEVER show any hypocrisy! So I guess all the abortion clinics that have been bombed have been by pro-choice left wingers! See, if you argue hard enough and bury your head deep enough in the sand, you can ALWAYS justify everything by saying your side is NEVER the bad side, NEVER wrong, doesn't EVER have the people doing the crazy, horrible things that are insanely misguided because of their extremism! Ironically... how you become an extremist in the first place! By claiming your side is the righteous side and anything done in service of it is...justified! Most of the time. Why give them the attention and platform they crave? This guy is alive though...so I suspect we'll find out. But it's usually just when they die. We saw that Dylan Roof's...didn't we? It seems like it's just strictly a matter of is there any legal reason to release it. If not, I don't think it's subject to a FOIA request with it being entered as evidence into...something. Sentencing or whatever.

This is about as valid an argument as Clark just makes money because she gets paid. You said the news Just picked it up. This is ALL about her responding to it for the first time. This was ALL over the news when it happened and you've made two posts about it. You and RedViking are NO DIFFERENT on this subject. Both just race baiting. In another few months if there's a hard foul between Griener and Clark and there are a few more articles talking about this, I'm sure we can count on you starting yet ANOTHER thread about what was said. Doesn't change that the news didn't just "pick this up." And the reason that should be REALLY obvious to anyone with two functioning brain cells? ALL of the headlines are about Griener's RESPONSE to the HIGHLY publiziced incident from a month ago...which you already have a thread for.

I don't know WTF "Global Sports Matters" is, but I know they are blaming Baseball for fewer black athlete in the NEXT post. Explain Juju Wakins? https://www.reuters.com/sports/report-uncs-rj-davis-uscs-juju-watkins-have-most-nil-deals-2025-04-02/?utm_source=chatgpt.com Paige Bueckers, the #1 recruit in the country, the #1 pick in the draft for the #1 program in the Country...by FAR. She got endorsement deals and then they swerve into some people with huge Instagram followings. Cool. Clark is... trying to put this nicely, but STILL not that attractive. I was REALLY trying to find a way to say this...without sounding mean, but...yeah, this!

This is just a clown post. I don't think you have any clue what you're talking about, you're just interjecting race and sex appeal into it for no reason and it couldn't be a dumber argument when you look at the history of the league. Sophie Cunningham would be making AT LEAST 6-7M a year in endorsements if what you were saying wasn't totally asinine. The last line is so ridiculous you know you're reaching.

Dude, don't do this. Don't force a stupid arguent on EVERY issue that you THINK you're supposed to be on one "side" of or you end up sounding no different than Jimmy/Scouts or whoever. It's not hard to say, you're trying to make it difficult! She's...average looking. She's not on this "end of the spectrum," that you think and she's ALWAYS making more than 1M based on her skills. She's successful because of her skills...full fkn stop. That's it. You don't need to compare the "body types" in Gymnastics and if you think it's not an Apples to Apples comp then why did YOU bring it up? I brought up other BASKETBALL players. I brought up one who was much better looking, an established star in the league and who made significantly less money. So a REAL pretty white girl in their mid 20s who didn't get 11M DESPITE being very good looking. Also, the 2nd highest paid player, a young black women who is not particularly good looking.