mspart

The solution is to not allow it. There is a reason there are boys and girls sports. The one is for boys, and the other is for girls. It is quite simple. mspart

This is true and it is wrong. No one should be targeted and bullied. mspart

If they say it enough it will be true. They learned that from Goebbels. Talking about leaning nazi. mspart

Where are the classes like "Should you start a business or work for someone else?" Don't work and don't pay your student loans. "How to raise a family well?" Rather how not to get stuck with a spouse and kid. "How to be a good citizen?" Rather, how to be a good activist. jross, you are living in the past man. Good citizen? Raise a family? Occupation? In this day of the government owes me everything and I own them nothing? You are seriously outdated, but right on. msspart

I would say everyone supports states rights. But supporting the state's right not to enforce the law, even their own law, is asking a bit much eh? They refuse to enforce federal law and they refuse to allow the feds to enforce federal law. How is that state's rights? mspart

An analysis of the situation by Jonathan Turley. https://jonathanturley.org/2025/06/09/always-ready-always-there-democrats-mobilize-against-the-national-guard-deployment/ Below is my column in Fox.com on the deployment of National Guard in Los Angeles. Another round of court challenges are unfolding, but the escalation is likely to continue on both sides. While the Guard’s motto is “Always Ready, Always There!,” California Democrats do not want them between rioters and federal law enforcement. Here is the column: Gov. Gavin Newsom was in his element this week. After scenes of burning cars and attacks on ICE personnel, Newsom declared that this was all “an illegal act, an immoral act, an unconstitutional act.” No, he was not speaking of the attacks on law enforcement or property. He was referring to President Donald Trump’s call to deploy the National Guard to protect federal officers. Newsom is planning to challenge the deployment as cities like Glendale are cancelling contracts to house detainees and reaffirming that local police will not assist the federal government. Trump has the authority under Section 12406 of Title 10 of the U.S. Code to deploy the National Guard if the president is “unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.” The Administration is saying that that is precisely what is unfolding in California, where mobs attack vehicles and trap federal personnel. Most critics are challenging the deployment on policy grounds, arguing that it is an unnecessary escalation. However, even critics like Berkeley Law Dean Erwin have admitted that “Unfortunately, President Trump likely has the legal authority to do this.” There is a fair debate over whether this is needed at this time, but the President is allowed to reach a different conclusion. Trump wants the violence to end now as opposed to escalating as it did in the Rodney King riots or the later riots after the George Floyd killings, causing billions in property damage and many deaths. Courts will be asked to halt the order because it did not technically go through Newsom to formally call out the National Guard. Section 12406 grants Trump the authority to call out the Guard and employs a mandatory term for governors, who “shall” issue the President’s order. In the memo, Trump also instructed federal officials “to coordinate with the Governors of the States and the National Guard Bureau.” Newsom is clearly refusing to issue the orders or coordinate the deployment. Even if such challenges are successful, Trump can clearly flood the zone with federal authority. Indeed, the obstruction could escalate the matter further, prompting Trump to consider using the Insurrection Act, which would allow troops to participate directly in civilian law enforcement. In 1958, President Eisenhower used the Insurrection Act to deploy troops to Arkansas to enforce the Supreme Court’s orders ending racial segregation in schools. The Trump Administration has already claimed that these riots “constitute a form of rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States.” In support of such a claim, the Administration could cite many of the Democratic leaders now denouncing the claim. After January 6th, liberal politicians and professors insisted that the riot was an “insurrection” and, in claiming that Trump and dozens of Republicans could be removed from ballots under the 14th Amendment. Liberal professors insisted that Trump’s use of the word “fight”and questioning the results of an election did qualify as an insurrection. They argued that you merely need to show “an assemblage of people” who are “resisting law” and “using force or intimidation” for “a public purpose.” The involvement of inciteful language from politicians only reinforced these claims. Sound familiar? Democrats are using this order to deflect from their own escalation of the tensions for months. From Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz calling ICE officers “Gestapo” to others calling them “fascists” and “Nazis,” Democratic leaders have been ignoring objections that they are fueling the violent and criminal responses. It did not matter. It was viewed as good politics. While Newsom and figures like Sen. Cory Booker (D., N.J.) have called these “peaceful” protests, rocks, and Molotov cocktails have been thrown at police as vehicles were torched. Police had to use tear gas, “flash bang” grenades, and rubber bullets to quell these “peaceful” protesters. I think he makes interesting points on this situation. The idea of sanctuary states and cities makes people feel safe to do the peaceful protests and destroy property. Like they have a right to do this and when Trump sends in folks to quell this, there is umbrage to this, because they have the right to peacefully protest and destroy stuff. Imagine if you will, how 1970-1990s America would have reacted to ICE or similar going to get illegals out of the country and being confronted with this. There would be zero support for the peaceful protesters. The local LE will not protect ICE et all nor their facilities or else Trump wouldn't have taken the action that he did. As far as Cali is concerned, the feds can protect themselves, except when they do they cry about it. mspart

Do you and your wife not have US passports? If so, why the worry? If not, I can understand your concern. mspart

Nice change of subject. That is defacto agreement with my premise. Thank you. mspart

LAPD had this perfectly under control yes indeedy. mspart

Yes, it was mostly peaceful. mspart

Be specific. How so? Upholding the law and putting down rebellion (defacing federal buildings, breaking windows, setting fire to law enforcement vehicles generally qualify as rebellion) is something the federal government can do. It has nothing to do with 1933 Nazi Germany. The feds are executing the law and the crazies are going nuts and destroying things in response. In 1933, it was the Nazi's that did the destroying things. Very different. mspart

Your "probablies" do not align with what jross said. He said the ‘cultural analysis in women’s gender and sexuality studies.' class was required for her to graduate. Not probably required. Apparently it is not probably an option. If it was, don't you think jross would have said that he tried to steer his daughter to take some other class or this one sounded the least horrible among a bunch of options? Not he said this was required, in otherwords, forced. mspart

The issue here is that ICE was lawfully fulfilling their duties. The demonstration against them arose from them lawfully executing the law. It is not so much Trump is declaring war on CA, but rather CA declaring war on ICE, a federal agency. As such, the federal government has every right to protect ICE officers. I heard a news report in CA this morning where the guy was saying all they are doing is "enjoying themselves watching cars burn." Well, now, obviously there is no harm in that. LA police have this thing completely under control with cars burning, people looting stores, rock and concrete being thrown at law enforcement officers, freeways being backed up, things being thrown off of over passes including Lime Bikes. Newsome nor Bass see any reason to stop this madness. As we saw in Minny and in Seattle and Portland, the absence of law enforcement allows the peaceful protests to continue indefinitely. Because there is no reason not to. Again, Newsome nor Bass see anything wrong with this. That is the problem right there. mspart

The topic you disagree with jross is not about what should or could be taught in a college. It is what is required to graduate. Why would the class jross objects to be a requirement to graduate? Just like why would the classes you list above be a requirement to graduate? mspart

https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2025/2/19/moss-harvard-free-speech-dead/ Free Speech is Dead at Harvard. I Doubt It’s Returning Anytime Soon. The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression free speech rankings — which place Harvard dead last — have been downplayed by University leadership. But let me tell you: Harvard deserves it. According to the University’s 2024 senior survey, only one-third of the graduating class feel comfortable expressing their opinions about controversial topics on campus in general, and nearly half are hesitant to do so even in a supposedly sacrosanct classroom setting. Anecdotally of course. mspart

It sure looks like he aimed at her. She was in the middle of the street alone with her cameraman. I agree this is unwarranted. I have no issue with trying to quell these mostly peaceful protests which have resulted in cars burning and looting and defacement of property. Not to mention the rocks thrown at officers etc. This needs to stop now and the CA officials need to back that or they will be engulfed in mostly peaceful protests. mspart

This is sad and does bring up that we are all mortal and our time can come at anytime, no matter how fit, strong, or healthy we are. Very sad news for Ben's family and Ben. I hope he recovers. I had pneumonia for 2 months last year and the medicines did not work until the third and most extreme type. It just kept spreading. A few days after I got a shot in the butt of the last medicine I felt well enough to go outside and walk, and I still remember being amazed how how it felt to get a full lung of air. I didn't recognize I had much of a problem in that way, but it was incredible. It was a long 2 months let me tell you. I got the pneumonia shot a few months after that. I don't need that again. Best wishes for Ben and his family. mspart

The effort to convert males to females, and females to male, (called the transexual movement) has nothing to do with androgeny. Androgeny is a different thing. To bring that into this discussion is intellectually dishonest because everyone knows what the subject of discussion is and that ain't it. Tripnsweep is from AZ. I am from WA and a boy just won the girls 400 meter state championship for the 2nd year in a row. Maybe the bigger question is why are there boys and girls sports in middle and high schools and men's and women's sports in the college level? Why was this done? And is it proper to then allow for boys that say they are girls to compete with girls and men who say they are women to compete with women? Equally, is it proper to allow the opposite? Bringing in androgeny is the last gasp of a lost cause. That clearly is not the issue at hand. Again, it is intellectually dishonest to even attempt to do so. mspart

Not under Biden they didn't. But a trial will be held. Nice that you admit he was not simply driving folks to their jobs. That was really a stupid thing to say. Call it what it is rather than what you wish it to be. You finally did that and kudos to you. mspart

He was innocently transporting folks to their jobs? Nope. He'll be in prison for a while. But as of now, not charged with weapons or narcotics infractions. Bondi just accused him of that, but no charges. That could come later I suppose. mspart

1. He was working for a known trafficker in illegal aliens 2. He was driving without a license when pulled over 3. He was driving the car of his boss, the human trafficker. 4. He was carrying 8 illegals in a car not built for carrying 8 people. 5. But FBI told the locals not to do anything. But the local police saw it for what it was. 6. I had not heard about weapons and narcotics charges until today. That ups the ante I think. So RV, his boss was a known smuggler of human cargo and he was using his boss's altered car to carry illegals from TX to MD. Seems like an interstate crime. I don't think the charges will be dropped anytime soon. mspart

Was Epstein in NY jail or prison for federal charges or Florida state charges? If Federal, it shouldn't matter where records are, the feds can get their hands on them. If FL state charges, why was in holed up in NY? I'm guessing the former is correct, federal charges, federal records under federal control. mspart

As far as I know, the father is still on the run or dead in the woods somewhere. This tragedy is just that, a real tragedy. He took them from Wenatchee and went to Leavenworth where there is an incredible amount of campgrounds and alpine hiking. The girls were found the car was found. So unless he had another car out there, he is most assuredly on foot. Leavenworth is a "Bavarian" town, that caters to Christmas celebration mostly. The Enchantments or Enchanted Lakes hike starts right there. It is a cool town to visit and if anyone is in the area, I highly recommend it. Maybe not right now, but it is a pretty cool place. We have spent a few Christmas's there as a family and it was fun. mspart

So why didn't Biden release this to absolutely rip Trump and prevent his election or nomination, if he truly is implicated in them? That is the question. mspart

Yes, Covid funding is no longer needed. That is a huge amount. Get rid of it. Go back to 2018 levels of spending. mspart