jross

You blab blabs who never lived one day under nuclear threat can now reflect blab your blab blab. You made quite a blab blab to blab the blab from blab blab tweets. Sir, this is not a church.

Very soon it may become impossible. Technology is rapidly improving such that one can manufacture video evidence of an alibi, and manufacture video evidence of a crime.

Yes indeed. Some opinions are more well-informed or well-reasoned than others based on a thorough understanding of the facts and evidence. Some opinions may be considered more appropriate or relevant than others on certain topics. I don't value Trump's opinion on many topics, however, I value Trump's opinion on trade policy over Fauci.

"Misdirection?" Yes, I followed your misdirection with my own about how Covid occurred. Why did you bring up Covid to being with? "You seem to be a little too invested in murdering others." Is your own emotion coming into this? "Murder" is not the legal definition of CP. I have contempt for those who freed the MoD more than the resistance against CP. However, had CP been implemented for the MoD, this deranged decision to release him would not have been possible.

It is appreciated that regardless of one's opinion, one does not step into the trap of binary thinking. "I could be wrong, you could be wrong, we could both be wrong..." this open thinking is the way.

Supporting capital punishment in a narrow set of circumstances does not mean "I want" to kill people or "I'm fired up." CP is a sad situation for very rare circumstances, filled with guilt, and not a job that I would perform. What's sketchy is that hundreds of people sign up for open jobs as executioners. It is confusing that "I value human life" US adults morally tolerate the "I'm not ready to be a parent" reason to dispatch millions of innocent unborn babies. At the same time, some of these people claim capital punishment is intolerable in all circumstances. I was surprised that 40% of people surveyed in this study would save their pet over a stranger if both were in front of a bus and only one could be saved. I'm one of the 60% that would save the random stranger over my Golden Retriever. However, I would save my Golden if the stranger was that murderous lady. Is there a price on human life? According to the 4000-year-old Code of Hammurabi, the unborn life was worth ten shekels, and adult life was an eye for an eye. Nowadays, the US government values a statistical life at $10 Million. The cost of incarcerating a criminal for 40 years is ~$1 Million. Add CP, and it's triple that cost. CP is not cost-effective, nor should it be for most situations. To an earlier practical point, for a narrow set of situations with simply unquestionable guilt convictions, the CP process could be streamlined and cost-effective. After exploring this and that, by all calculations for morality and the price of human life, the MoD for Briner trade was an objectively bad deal.

The number of votes for and against Trump in the 2020 election imply more people care about politics than ever before. Government, corporations, and statesmen corruption have more discussions than I can recall in my lifetime. Trump is his worst enemy; a tyrant with his words. He had his time; he made his point. How many Trump elections are required for 'we the people' to demand better government? A return to the status quo before Trump is still a 'L.'

When was the last time an honest candidate was the presidential nominee for the two-party system? I stopped writing in candidates after 2016 because they had no chance of winning. Given Bill1 and Bill2 are corrupt statesmen far beyond my character acceptance for president, the Bill that best aligns below wins my vote. Bonus points for having a well-informed plan and a record of delivering results fast. corruption in the government poor leadership, media psych-ops, big tech collusion, big brother behavior, blind spending, election security, insider trading, lobbying, term limits in the legislative branch, inability to disagree and commit, lack of transparency affordability of quality education through college increasing high cost of living/inflation in relation to my net worth affordability of healthcare meaningful reduction of illegal immigration accountability for life's choices

Covid? may have criminal acts beyond the MoD. What is the source of Covid? How did it spread? Did any players in the event 201 risk-mitigation tabletops in October 2019 have involvement in Covid funding or its release? Was there any mal-intent? Who, what, when, where, why, and how were the Covid mitigation decisions made?

What would society do if this woman was a big dog acting similarly? She acted unpredictably and committed severe violence on multiple occasions (she stabbed a workman and pushed a 3-year-old girl on train tracks). She said she wanted to die. Do you isolate her for life? Her behavior is on video, and her proven guilt is absolute. How much will it cost to house and medicate this lady for the rest of her life?

Before the election.

Attention: @BobDole@Coach Bankowski Zips with content from two forums are available here ~750MB College - https://drive.google.com/file/d/15DtYZPy3mT2vmcJZkEjofK19pI1OLOV9/view?usp=sharing ~300MB International - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SnjcR85IWSy8fNFsQrmyWpToMWaZvvoe/view?usp=sharing Download and extract the files. You can use the built-in File Explorer search to find topics by directory name or by the file contents. See https://seekfast.org/blog/search-text-in-documents/search-files-in-windows-10/ for help with File Explorer options. Note: search by topic is the default option. You can open the file in a browser. Use the file explorer to navigate the topic to the next page and open the HTML files directly. The HTML is unmodified. Selecting to navigate another page will load the original web address and fail since the site was shut down. I have no plans to invest time and energy to provide better user-friendly access.

KWWL is much better journalism. To be a stickler, KWWL shows its bias in selecting what outside news to bring in. Today's front page is good but it's not always good. This is MUCH MUCH MUCH better than the mainstream. Center-left but not extreme left.

Will you share how the evaluation was performed for 1-2 studies, and do they address my question? I don't question that little evidence of convictions has been found or that few reports of fraud exist. For example, these are small numbers in Texas since 2005 534 - Successfully prosecuted election fraud offenses against 155 individuals by the Office of the Attorney General since 2005. 510 - The number of pending offenses against 43 defendants, currently pending prosecution. 386 - The number of currently active election fraud investigations. https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/initiatives/election-integrity How can any study discover what fraud occurs that is not reported? How likely is it that the older citizens were thankful for the good citizen Rachel for collecting their ballet, helping them 'pick the preferred' candidate, and to be friendly with gifts? How many of the 7000 citizens reported concerns of fraud? In my workplace, observability data informs me which product users are frustrated by application disruption. Once, I proactively called to inform a customer of a problem and its resolution. The customer was unaware and got back to me that its 900-employee user base was unable to use the product feature for several days. The customer help desk had taken a couple of calls and had not opened a ticket with my company. Even when people know there is a problem, they are hesitant to report the problem to the right people. There is another type of error, the silent error, where a function fails in the back-end system, and no human is notified. The percentage of errors reported back to my company is near zero percent. Does the lack of customer-reported incidents mean the errors did not occur? As a citizen that wants election integrity, can I validate who the system counted my vote for so that I have confidence in election integrity and can report concerns?

Election fraud conviction is exceedingly rare. How do you prove that fraud is exceedingly rare?

Important: Partisan election interference through big tech, covertly and overtly, has a massive influence and should be taken seriously. Fraud: The secret voting process reduces the risk of voter coercion. It is, unfortunately, complex to audit and identify fraud. Fraud does happen. Are you aware of the story of Rachel Rodriguez in Texas, who admitted on video that she knew she was illegally affecting up to 7,000 votes? https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/news/releases/ag-paxton-san-antonio-election-fraudster-arrested-widespread-vote-harvesting-and-fraud /Pausing here. Thoughts? Can you prove that fraud does not occur? Does that mean that fraud does not occur? Is 7,000 votes a lot for a single person to influence? Is it reasonable to believe she was the only person that committed fraud in the 2020 election? Is it reasonable to believe that fraud only would occur for one candidate?

Sometimes you just gotta take a chill pill, ya know? It's like Jake the Snake used to say, 'calm down and hit the canvas like a ton of bricks.' - OpenAI ChatGPT - tell me a quote about chill pill in the style of jake the snake Well, let me tell you, brother, everything is fine at home. The fridge is stocked, the laundry is done, and I just spent the morning oiling up the lawn mower. Everything is fine, brother, except for my wife. She's still mad at me for not remembering to put the toilet seat down. But you know what they say, brother: Don't get mad; get even. So I just bought her a new toilet seat with a built-in stand. Problem solved, brother. Hulkamania forever! - OpenAI ChatGPT - tell me a joke about everything is fine at home in the style of hulk hogan OpenAI ChatGPT spoke in the style of Ric Flairy, Iron Sheik, and Macho Man Randy Savage in the previous comment. Searched something like two guys debate/argue in the style of...

Well, let me tell you something, brother. We were just minding our own business, having a civil discussion, when all of a sudden, things took a turn for the worst. It was like a plane crash in slow motion, brother. One minute, we were agreeing to disagree, and the next minute, we were locked in a heated argument. It was like a train wreck, brother. A train wreck with words. But, you know what they say, to be the man, you gotta beat the man. And I think it's safe to say, I took the title of top debater in this match. WOOOOO! Haha. The Nature Boy has arrived, brother. He knows jabronis can be like a camel, always on its high horse, thinking they are better than everyone else. But let me tell you something, my friends - the camel is a dirty animal, and so is the jabroni. They both need to be put in their place and humbled by the mighty Iron Sheik! Well, let me tell you something, brother. Bringing professional wrestlers into the discussion is like a big old scoop of vanilla ice cream. It might sound good on paper, but when you take a bite, it's just plain boring. But me, I'm like a big old bowl of Jalapeno ice cream. I'm spicy, I'm unpredictable, and I'll always bring the heat. So if you want to complain about legitimacy, that's fine, but just remember: don't mess with the Macho Man, because I'm the real flavor of the month!

The tiny list gets bigger. https://www.kgw.com/article/news/crime/portland-woman-allegedly-pushes-3-year-old-onto-train-tracks/283-1d3203c3-50c1-47ef-b27f-f904ecb7d5d9

Respectfully, Trump is a synonym for Biden in that particular sentence.

Have you checked out the doc on peacock?

Evidence shows that the FBI lied to suppress the Biden laptop story before the 2020 election. There is evidence that Twitter suppressed information damaging the Biden campaign in the 2020 election. There was evidence in the 2016 election that Google influenced results in favor of the Clinton campaign. Google still is unregulated and moderating search suggestions and results in the U.S.A. There are articles about the massive influence of Facebook and the effect it can have on an election. The election hardware used in the 2020 election was proven to be hackable without a trace record in 2006. People openly admit doing whatever it took to vote Trump out of office. People were caught undercover, admitting they were doing whatever they could with propaganda to get Trump voted out of office. People were arrested for buying votes in the 2020 election. Laws were changed in advance of the 2020 election to benefit one party. The winning party refused to allow the opposition to monitor the voting process at specific locations. There were anomalies in the votes in multiple locations. The government stated that this was the 'most secure election in history.' Can that be proven or disproven? All of these statements can be cited. Forgive me for not having them at my fingertips.

Sir, this is a forum to discuss non-wrestling topics. It is so wrong it's right.