Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
10 minutes ago, flyingcement said:

So it seem pretty likely that Ohio State just matched or upped whatever financial offer was mentioned by OKST?

My read as well.  May have all been a plan to get more money for himself, which is fine by me.

  • Bob 2
  • Brain 1
  • Fire 1
Posted
My read as well.  May have all been a plan to get more money for himself, which is fine by me.

People regularly do that in every other sector, so good for him, if it worked.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Brain 1
Posted
10 hours ago, Hammerlock3 said:

Can I derail the thread with a semantic argument now

Please do. 🤠

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, flyingcement said:

So it seem pretty likely that Ohio State just matched or upped whatever financial offer was mentioned by OKST?

I heard OkSt was just shy of six figures. Gotta assume Tom matched it. 

Edited by TNwrestling
  • Bob 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, TNwrestling said:

I heard OkSt was just shy of six figures. Gotta assume Tom matched it. 

Per year?  Or total?  This seems like peanuts compared to the slumlord’s offers

  • Bob 1
  • Jagger 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, MPhillips said:

90k per semester...:classic_huh:

I'm sure this part may sound erroneous but someone in Stillwater has deep pockets and I was told it was someone in...ahem...Low Places. 

  • Fire 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, TNwrestling said:

I heard OkSt was just shy of six figures.

 

59 minutes ago, MPhillips said:

90k per semester...:classic_huh:

Maybe $10,000 across 3 years?  5 figures is just shy of 6.  🙅‍♀️

Edited by ionel

.

Posted

Good on the athletes for getting paid, but this is all a side effect of the third party pay-for-play system we're operating in.  Contracts and salaries could fix this particular phenomenon.  

Unfortunate reality of the new era that an athlete can effectively hold out at any time of their own choosing. 

  • Bob 2
  • Brain 1
Posted
19 hours ago, 1032004 said:

I could be wrong but I think the Flo guys said something about there being a question about whether wrestling in the All-Star might actually burn the redshirt 

Yes, The Big 10 interpretation seemed to be the All-Star meet would count as a competition for the purpose of redshirting.

Posted
40 minutes ago, Interviewed_at_Weehawken said:

He gets most of his "intel" from reading boards such as this! Can you imagine thinking internet posters are reliable sources of info?

Say it ain't so ... I find you've ruined my faith in the Jimmy.  

.

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Interviewed_at_Weehawken said:

He gets most of his "intel" from reading boards such as this! Can you imagine thinking internet posters are reliable sources of info?

Willie says Mineo is 90% correct. But Willie also say's, there are no issues with pop-ups and ads...:classic_dry:

Edited by MPhillips
  • Bob 2
  • Brain 1
  • Haha 1

.

Posted
4 hours ago, MPhillips said:

Garth MF Brooks...

What are you talking about that is ridiculous to even joke about.

 

It was obviously Chris Gaines.

  • Jagger 1

i am an idiot on the internet

Posted
1 hour ago, MPhillips said:

Willie says Mineo is 90% correct. But Willie also say's, there are no issues with pop-ups and ads...:classic_dry:

Willie is at best 10% correct.  Does that make Mineo 9%?  🤔

  • Bob 1
  • Brain 1
  • Haha 1

.

Posted
16 hours ago, ionel said:

Willie is at best 10% correct.  Does that make Mineo 9%?  🤔

Will Ferrell Anchorman GIF

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...