Cowardly Trump Backing Out of Debating Harris

[Husker_Du]

3 hours ago, uncle bernard said:

mostly that she doesn’t support eliminating the market economy. 

words have meaning willie. read a book for once in your life. 

apologies. not 'communist'. 'socialist' rather.

and spare me the 'words have meaning' rhetoric after stanning for Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. 

[uncle bernard]

6 hours ago, Husker_Du said:

apologies. not 'communist'. 'socialist' rather.

and spare me the 'words have meaning' rhetoric after stanning for Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. 

she’s not a socialist either. she’s a moderate liberal. that’s why she has considerable corporate backing. there’s not a single policy on her platform that would come close to enforcing anything close to “equality of outcome.” she doesn’t even support single payer healthcare.

it’s hilarious that you guys are trying to make the incoherent speaker thing stick when you support donald trump. all that man does is ramble incoherently. you might have a point if she was running against *literally anybody else.*

[Bigbrog]

54 minutes ago, uncle bernard said:

she’s not a socialist either. she’s a moderate liberal. that’s why she has considerable corporate backing. there’s not a single policy on her platform that would come close to enforcing anything close to “equality of outcome.” she doesn’t even support single payer healthcare.

it’s hilarious that you guys are trying to make the incoherent speaker thing stick when you support donald trump. all that man does is ramble incoherently. you might have a point if she was running against *literally anybody else.*

I thought you didn't know what her policies are/would be??  Because you aren't going to vote for her.

[uncle bernard]

28 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

I thought you didn't know what her policies are/would be??  Because you aren't going to vote for her.

i know kamala harris because she was an early frontrunner in the 2020 primary and i'm a bernie guy. 

ronald reagan could be the dem nominee and you guys would convince yourselves he’s che guevara. 

[Bigbrog]

30 minutes ago, uncle bernard said:

i know kamala harris because she was an early frontrunner in the 2020 primary and i'm a bernie guy. 

ronald reagan could be the dem nominee and you guys would convince yourselves he’s che guevara. 

Oh...I could have swore that in either this thread or another one that "Why would I care?  I am not voting for her" when someone asked you what her policies were, but apparently you have known all along...got it.

And who do you mean "you guys"??  Because I agree with some other posters on specific topics or points made doesn't paint me into a box of that I only vote republican...I have said many times I have voted both ways...Billy the first time and Obama the first time.  And I am up in the air on who I am going to vote for this fall...I hate the "less worse" vote but then again it is better than no vote...IMHO.

As for Kamala...I don't think I could ever vote for her...what I do know of her potential policies I don't really agree with and listening to her talk, well, she makes zero sense in the things she says and spews nothing but word salads.

[Scouts Honor]

48 minutes ago, uncle bernard said:

i know kamala harris because she was an early frontrunner in the 2020 primary and i'm a bernie guy. 

ronald reagan could be the dem nominee and you guys would convince yourselves he’s che guevara. 

if he ran as a dem

remember, trump is a life long democrat

[uncle bernard]

35 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

Oh...I could have swore that in either this thread or another one that "Why would I care?  I am not voting for her" when someone asked you what her policies were, but apparently you have known all along...got it.

And who do you mean "you guys"??  Because I agree with some other posters on specific topics or points made doesn't paint me into a box of that I only vote republican...I have said many times I have voted both ways...Billy the first time and Obama the first time.  And I am up in the air on who I am going to vote for this fall...I hate the "less worse" vote but then again it is better than no vote...IMHO.

As for Kamala...I don't think I could ever vote for her...what I do know of her potential policies I don't really agree with and listening to her talk, well, she makes zero sense in the things she says and spews nothing but word salads.

I certainly don't care enough to discuss them on here. The question was asked of me with the assumption I support her, which I don't. But I'm well aware of the standard Democratic Party platform. What she's specifically running on, I don't care enough to know. Probably nothing to be honest, just like the last 2. It will be a "Trump bad" campaign again.

[ThreePointTakedown]

On 7/31/2024 at 10:01 AM, headshuck said:

Why would he debate an illegitimate candidate?

And why isn’t the VP debating the Republican VP candidate?

How is Harris illegitimate? 

Did the delegates, through the DNC process, vote for and nominate their candidate? 

People voting for the candidate is a recent phenomenon. Granted it might not look great. But too bad. That's the process. So it is legit in all the ways that matter. 

[mspart]

Biden was voted in the primaries and had the delegates.  Harris did not.   But Biden endorsed Harris and it appears the delegates followed to her.   So legitimate and not at the same time.   There was no competition in the primaries.   If Joe had not run, and Kamala had to duke it out with other Ds, she would have lost.   in 2020, she dropped out before a vote was cast.   She is that bad.  

She has not held a news conference fielding questions for 2 weeks.   Why?   Because she sounds like a HS student trying to fill a void with word salad hoping to impress everyone with the amount she can talk while actually making no sense.  

To wit, her comments on inflation   https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/kamala-harris-admits-inflation-heavy-weight

"Prices have gone up and families and individuals are dealing with the realities of the bread costs more, the gas costs more, and have to understand what that means," she said. "That’s about the cost of living going up. That’s about having to stress and stretch limited resources."

Harris said that is a "source of stress for families" that is "not only economic, but is, on a daily level, something that is a heavy weight to carry."

"It is something we take very seriously, very seriously," she said, adding that historically, when prices go up, "it has a direct impact on the quality of life for all people in our country."

"It’s a big issue and we take it seriously and it is a priority for us," Harris said, adding that the administration has addressed it "in a number of ways."

That gives me loads of confidence that she knows what she is talking about.  She is just inane. 

mspart

 

[jross]

check out her cloud comments.  ffs.

[jross]

Just say you don’t know rather than make up info. (cloud)

[jross]

this guy is in pain defending gov track

https://www.govtrack.us/posts/434/2024-07-26_we-retracted-our-single-year-legislator-report-cards-after-warning-about-their-unreliability

[Wrestleknownothing]

You guys act like any of this matters. Her single greatest accomplishment is also her single greatest qualification in the minds of voters. She is not, has never been, and will never be Donald J. Trump. The J stands for insurrection.

[red viking]

So now that Trump's lead has evaporated, he is willing to debate her, but ONLY if the rigged Fox News is host. 

What a cowardly punk. 

[ionel]

Just now, Wrestleknownothing said:

 The J stands for insurrection.

someone might be due for an eye test and new reading glasses  

[Scouts Honor]

5 hours ago, red viking said:

So now that Trump's lead has evaporated, he is willing to debate her, but ONLY if the rigged Fox News is host. 

What a cowardly punk. 

lol

[red viking]

Just now, Scouts Honor said:

lol

Of course. To you, Fox News is "fair and balanced," right? 

[Scouts Honor]

go back through the presidential debates since 2008 and tell me about fair and balanced from cnn etc

[Bigbrog]

36 minutes ago, red viking said:

Of course. To you, Fox News is "fair and balanced," right? 

Fox isn't any more balanced than CNN/ABC/MSNBC...would you agree?

[red viking]

45 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

Fox isn't any more balanced than CNN/ABC/MSNBC...would you agree?

Fox News (TV) is on the fringe, like MSNBC. ABC and CNN are closer to the middle, even if they slightly lean left. ABC is extremely close to the middle. 

https://www.quora.com/What-are-some-credible-conservative-news-sources-1

[Bigbrog]

9 minutes ago, red viking said:

Fox News (TV) is on the fringe, like MSNBC. ABC and CNN are closer to the middle, even if they slightly lean left. ABC is extremely close to the middle. 

https://www.quora.com/What-are-some-credible-conservative-news-sources-1

LOL!!!!  Guess we are done talking about this topic if you going to spew crap like this.  Blinded by political ideology.  And thus, you should be the last person to claim anyone on here is extreme and blinded by their political ideology!!

[Scouts Honor]

15 hours ago, red viking said:

Fox News (TV) is on the fringe, like MSNBC. ABC and CNN are closer to the middle, even if they slightly lean left. ABC is extremely close to the middle. 

https://www.quora.com/What-are-some-credible-conservative-news-sources-1

lol

george steph.

[red viking]

To the whacky right, everything is biased to the left except Fox, which is in the middle. The only sources that are "righty" are EXTREME fringe sources like Breitbart or that nutjob Alex Jones. 

[Bigbrog]

19 minutes ago, red viking said:

To the whacky right, everything is biased to the left except Fox, which is in the middle. The only sources that are "righty" are EXTREME fringe sources like Breitbart or that nutjob Alex Jones. 

And the whacky left say things like this

[red viking]

1 hour ago, Bigbrog said:

And the whacky left say things like this

Wrong. I just said CNN and ABC were near the middle but slightly left (CNN farther than ABC).