Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Preview.

So far we have 20 predictions from this board, 14 from HVI, and 6 from GIA. Not really surprising that the HVI guys our more than twice as willing to make a prediction.

But what that really shows is it takes those two boards to equal our one.

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
1 hour ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

Past predictors who have not presently predicted:

@BerniePragle, @Gus, @Interviewed_at_Weehawken, @ionel, @Perry, @RandolphTJones, @1032004, @D3UC157, @FearTheTurtle, @fishbane, @Holtfan, @Nailbender, @Nittanychris, @PortaJohn.

Prodigal predictors come home. No questions asked. We will kill the fatted calf.

Since i'm jealous of PSU's success I tend to root for Iowa when these 2 match up. With that said, I think Iowas best chance at a win is 125. Really eager to see 165 and 184 if Arnold goes. 

I think Penn St wins 9 matches to 1 (125) 

Posted

125 - Davis dec Ayala  3-0
133 - Nagao dec Schrievske  6-0
141 - Bartlett dec Woods  9-0 
149 - Kasak dec Rathjen  12-0
157 - Haines dec Franek  15-0
165 - Caliendo dec Mesenbrink  15-3
174 - Starocci md Kennedy  19-3
184 - Truax dec Riggins  22-3
197 - Brooks tf Glazier 27-3
285 - Kerk md Hill 31-3

2BPE 11/17/24 SMC

Posted

I think the Glazier v. Brooks match is one that could be close.  Glazier is a guy who seems to have a good motor and he likes to score.  His best win is against Allred who has been quite underwhelming this year, but Glazier did look good in the match. I guess Friday night we will see just how good he is.

  • Fire 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, PSULou64 said:

I think the Glazier v. Brooks match is one that could be close.  Glazier is a guy who seems to have a good motor and he likes to score.  His best win is against Allred who has been quite underwhelming this year, but Glazier did look good in the match. I guess Friday night we will see just how good he is.

It won't be close, but I think there's a great shot for Glazier to keep it to a decision.  Brooks is just more athletic and more technical than Glazier, a tough combination to overcome unless you have some physicality/bully to you, which Glazier doesn't really wrestle that kind of bruising style.

Posted

Thanks for the reminder WKN

125: Ayala dec Davis 3-0 Iowa

133: Nagao dec Schriever 3-3

141: Woods dec Bartlett 6-3 Iowa

149: Kasak dec Rathjen 6-6

157: Franek dec Haines 9-6 Iowa

165: Mesenbrink maj Caliendo 10-9 PSU

174: Starocci maj Kennedy 14-9

184: Truax maj Riggins 18-9

197: Brooks maj Glazier 22-9

285: Kerk tech Hill 27-9

  • Fire 2
Posted (edited)

Pyle also said on FRL he thinks we see Arnold at 184 if healthy.

They said “I don’t know why we wouldn’t see Arnold at all” but I can see saving him for Oklahoma State

Edited by 1032004
Posted

125- Ayala dec Davis 3-0 Iowa

133- Nagao dec Schriever 3-3 Tie

141- Woods dec Bartlett 6-3 Iowa

149- Kasak dec Rathjen 6-6 Tie

157- Franek dec Haines 9-6 Iowa

165- Mesenbrink mdec Caliendo 10-9 PSU

174- Starrocci mdec Kennedy 14-9 PSU

184- Truax tf Riggins 19-9 PSU

197- Brooks md Glazier 23-9 PSU

HWT- Kerk dec Kueter 26-9 PSU

Posted
16 minutes ago, Ohio Elite said:

Just because I love wrestling

 

now that was so much fun to watch I watched it multiple times just to see the pin and hear the announcer say "what's going on here"

Posted

125 Ayala dec. Davis 3-0

133 Nagao md Schriever/Teske 3-4

141 Woods dec. Bartlett 6-4

149 Kasak dec. Voin/Rathjen 6-7

157 Haines dec. Franek 6-10

165 Mesenbrink dec. Caliendo 6-13

174 Starocci md Kennedy 6-17

184 Truax dec. Riggins/Arnold 6-20

197 Brooks md Glazier 6-24

285 Kerkvliet md Hill/Kueter 6-28

Posted

My original prediction had Iowa only winning two but I now think either Messenbrink or Kasak get Carver'd and lose. 

Can Arnold only go 1 more time?    I would really like to see him against Starocci after all of their trash talking but I doubt Iowa throws him out there at 174. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Dogbone said:

My original prediction had Iowa only winning two but I now think either Messenbrink or Kasak get Carver'd and lose. 

Can Arnold only go 1 more time?    I would really like to see him against Starocci after all of their trash talking but I doubt Iowa throws him out there at 174. 

Feel free to change anything you like.

  • Fire 1

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted (edited)
35 minutes ago, Dogbone said:

Can Arnold only go 1 more time?    I would really like to see him against Starocci after all of their trash talking but I doubt Iowa throws him out there at 174. 

He has four competitions, but I don't know if he was attached at the Soldier Solute.

For example, Ryder Rogotzke had five competitions before his Michigan match, making Penn State his 7th... he was unattatched at Midlands, though.  Midlands and Solider Solute were the same days.

Edit: Meaning if he wasn't attached at Soldier Solute, then he has two left.  Penn State and Oklahoma State.

Edited by nhs67
  • Fire 1

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Posted

Yeah... Arnold has two to go.  Was unattached at the Soldier Solute.

 

Screenshot_20240207_181824_Chrome.jpg

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Posted
5 hours ago, ionel said:

125 - Davis dec Ayala  3-0
133 - Nagao dec Schrievske  6-0
141 - Bartlett dec Woods  9-0 
149 - Kasak dec Rathjen  12-0
157 - Haines dec Franek  15-0
165 - Caliendo dec Mesenbrink  15-3
174 - Starocci md Kennedy  19-3
184 - Arnold dec Truax  22-6
197 - Brooks tf Glazier 27-6
285 - Kerk dec Kueter  30-6

ftfm

2BPE 11/17/24 SMC

Posted
10 hours ago, Dogbone said:

I don't see it.  Regardless, you have to win the B1G tourney to get the #1 seed at NCAAs.   PSU doesn't strike me as a team that cares that much about winning the B1Gs or their seed.  It is all about NCAAs so unless they think facing Woods twice is better than three times (highly unlikely), ducking doesn't provide a benefit. 

I’m sure ducking to face a brock hardy in the semis at big 10s vs Mendez is no big deal.  
 

Duck city is cool for me but not for thee.   

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...