Jump to content

My Version Of The Tattle


Recommended Posts

The best part is that Clinton was never charged,  while inmate #PO#1135809 has 91 indictments under his belt!

 

Owner of over two decades of the most dangerous words on the internet!  In fact, during the short life of this forum, me's culture has been cancelled three times on this very site!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, MPhillips said:

Charged and Indicted are not interchangeable...

I get what you're saying.  

Precisely why I always say I'm not an attorney,  and nor do I ever try to play one in the classroom or on the internet. 

It's irrelevant to the video though and what "judge" Winebox had to say in 2016.

Edited by Ban Basketball

Owner of over two decades of the most dangerous words on the internet!  In fact, during the short life of this forum, me's culture has been cancelled three times on this very site!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Plasmodium said:

For the record, Crooked Hillary was not charged or indicted.

Exactly,  which makes my statement not terribly far off.

Inmate #PO1135809 had both happen to him.  91 times in one example. 

Owner of over two decades of the most dangerous words on the internet!  In fact, during the short life of this forum, me's culture has been cancelled three times on this very site!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Plasmodium said:

For the record, Crooked Hillary was not charged or indicted.

which makes shit abundantly clear the DOJ is partisan.

she's as crooked as the day is long. 

there's no way you're saying this with a straight face, right? 

  • Like 1

Jason Bryant works here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Husker_Du said:

which makes shit abundantly clear the DOJ is partisan.

she's as crooked as the day is long. 

there's no way you're saying this with a straight face, right? 

Just because something does not go the way you expect it to does not mean it is partisan. I suppose the same is true about the Supreme Court, right?

 

Yes I realize this isn't a checkmate moment but c'mon quit being so damn combative all the time. My Side vs Your Side is exactly what's wrong with this damn country. It's not teams.

i am an idiot on the internet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We all vote. Sometimes what we vote for isn't selected. We have a social contract to abide by the winning side and we move on. We may not like it, but we accept it.

Once we do not accept what the democracy has stated is when the social contract is broken. Don't break the social contract because you know what happens next and it sucks for all of us.

i am an idiot on the internet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Husker_Du said:

which makes shit abundantly clear the DOJ is partisan.

she's as crooked as the day is long. 

there's no way you're saying this with a straight face, right? 

It was Trump's DOJ.  Technically, much of it still is .  Absolute straight face.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Plasmodium said:

It was Trump's DOJ.  Technically, much of it still is .  Absolute straight face.

Which is also filled with Democrats and Republicans. 

Those of us who don't work in legal fields,  nor know how the professional application of law and justice works need to stop spreading this fuel to the fire that the entire system is corrupt and partisan.  It's just continuing to fuel these terrorists among us. 

  • Like 1

Owner of over two decades of the most dangerous words on the internet!  In fact, during the short life of this forum, me's culture has been cancelled three times on this very site!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Husker_Du said:

y'all are saying, with a straight face, that hillary is guilty of nothing?

that's what you're going with? 

there's nothing that she should/could be indicted for?

nonsense. 

I'll agree that the Clintons were and are weasels, but the fact remains that she never was charged and/or indicted.  

A good amount that has been assertec about her is also not true, which has deliberately misled people to believe that she did more than what she did. Another classic example of something being "true enough" or "plausible." Too often,  that is passing for truth and fact today. 

Owner of over two decades of the most dangerous words on the internet!  In fact, during the short life of this forum, me's culture has been cancelled three times on this very site!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"the fact remains that she never was charged and/or indicted."

that's what i have a problem with. that's my point. 

Benghazi, the Steele Dossier, Haiti, Epstein, the body count, etc, etc

and....nothin'.

 

the entire point is that the charges on Trump may well indeed be justified, but nothing on Hillary is a joke.

ffs, the NY AG is prosecuting on the gd Stormy Daniels bs but Hillary, who scammed a country out of millions during a natural disaster is teflon? 

Jason Bryant works here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Husker_Du said:

y'all are saying, with a straight face, that hillary is guilty of nothing?

that's what you're going with? 

there's nothing that she should/could be indicted for?

nonsense. 

She is definitely not guilty in any legal context because she was not charged or indicted for any crime whatsoever.  People can and will use the internet rumors they have swallowed whole and unfiltered over the years to declare her guilty without trial or even evidence solid enough to make it into a court of law.  Best of luck with this 7+ years of history that allegedly occurred 3 administrations ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Plasmodium said:

She is definitely not guilty in any legal context because she was not charged or indicted for any crime whatsoever.  People can and will use the internet rumors they have swallowed whole and unfiltered over the years to declare her guilty without trial or even evidence solid enough to make it into a court of law.  Best of luck with this 7+ years of history that allegedly occurred 3 administrations ago.

I agree...but only if what you said applies to EVERYONE Plasi...not just those that you didn't vote for.

We ALL have swallowed internet rumors and other things read on social media...including myself and yourself...the problem is the lens in which people choose to look through when reading/watching those things is where the divergence comes into play.  People on both sides do it...some A LOT more than others.

My whole thing is, and I'll just pick on you even though you know I do like you Plasi, your enjoyment when the rumors came out that Trump may be charged, and statements you made about Trump BEFORE he was indicted would not mirror those said about Hillary...is that an accurate statement?  Also, most people that are complaining about Trump, not all but most, aren't defending Trump as a person, but rather the complete hypocrisy of the whole thing.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

I agree...but only if what you said applies to EVERYONE Plasi...not just those that you didn't vote for.

We ALL have swallowed internet rumors and other things read on social media...including myself and yourself...the problem is the lens in which people choose to look through when reading/watching those things is where the divergence comes into play.  People on both sides do it...some A LOT more than others.

My whole thing is, and I'll just pick on you even though you know I do like you Plasi, your enjoyment when the rumors came out that Trump may be charged, and statements you made about Trump BEFORE he was indicted would not mirror those said about Hillary...is that an accurate statement?  Also, most people that are complaining about Trump, not all but most, aren't defending Trump as a person, but rather the complete hypocrisy of the whole thing.

Not sure what you are saying about me, but I have not declared Trump guilty for any of the 91 or so charges for which he is indicted.  I do enjoy his journey to justice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

14 minutes ago, Plasmodium said:

Not sure what you are saying about me, but I have not declared Trump guilty for any of the 91 or so charges for which he is indicted.  I do enjoy his journey to justice.

I think what BigBrog was asking was would you be enjoying Hillary's journey to justice just as much if that was her lot?    The answer based on your statements on these boards would be NO.   You have not declared Trump guilty but you have done everything short of that, including your last sentence, "I do enjoy his journey to justice".   That means you think he is guilty and deserves whatever conviction he gets.   Do you feel the same about Hillary?   That is the question. 

A two tiered justice system is no justice system.   Certainly not for a civilized society.  Lady Justice is blindfolded for a reason. 

mspart

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Husker_Du said:

Benghazi, the Steele Dossier, Haiti, Epstein, the body count, etc, etc

 

Benghazi was extensively looked into and what was concluded is exactly what we all witnessed:  terrorists attacked Americans and Hillary Clinton wasn't at their side.

The Steele Dossier?  Was that illegal?

What about Epstein?  I know that inmate #PO1135809 had more association with him than did Hillary.

Not remembering Haiti nor "the body count," but I suspect it's another big nothing.

Owner of over two decades of the most dangerous words on the internet!  In fact, during the short life of this forum, me's culture has been cancelled three times on this very site!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Rankings

  • College Commitments

    Israel Ibarra

    Santa Cruz Valley Union, Arizona
    Class of 2025
    Committed to North Carolina
    Projected Weight: 184

    Bronson Baxter

    Dumas, Texas
    Class of 2024
    Committed to Little Rock
    Projected Weight: 157

    Mason Blue

    Laney, North Carolina
    Class of 2024
    Committed to Gardner-Webb
    Projected Weight: 197, 285

    Tristan Cotto

    Laney, North Carolina
    Class of 2024
    Committed to Gardner-Webb
    Projected Weight: 149, 157

    Jesus Gonzalez

    Reedsburg, Wisconsin
    Class of 2024
    Committed to Minnesota State Mankato
    Projected Weight: 285
×
×
  • Create New...