Wrestleknownothing

A++ 100% Well done.

And here I thought he was a Bob Mould fan.

Trivia Question: Can anyone name the four time All-American with the highest placement total? Hint: He achieved his total of 27 at two different schools. This happened within the last 10 tournaments. Bonus trivia: Can anyone name the four time All-American, who won at least one championship, with the highest placement total? Hint: There are two tied with a total of 19. They also did this within the last 10 tournaments.

My list was the 40 who had higher totals than Fix while winning at least one, so it is 11 or greater. The guys with 10 and lower are not on that list. By the way, there are 68 guys with 10 or lower.

Mike Evans got 6th three times and DNP'ed one time.

Yes, so their total is 10. And that is not higher than Fix's total of 10.

They would have the lowest. 1+1+1+1=4 I am looking for the highest total.

Trivia Question: Can anyone name the four time All-American with the highest placement total? Bonus trivia: Can anyone name the four time All-American, who won at least one championship, with the highest placement total?

I am not sure how I feel about a fifth bite at the apple. But how about some Fix Trivia? Or is it a trivia fix? Fix has the lowest sum of finishes of any four time All-American who has not won a National Championship (2+2+2+4 = 10). And he has a lower total than 40 four timers who won at least one championship.

History of Champions in the lowest weight class. First the timeline of what was the lowest weight contested: By School, By Weight (pretty, but hard to read): By School, By Weight (ugly, but easy to read):

Welcome to the board, Cameron? Chris? Bryan? Brett? David? Kyle? Eric? Joseph? Shawn? Jason? Rodney? Rusty? Sedric? Tom?

Chef's kiss

Worthy citizen

And will it come from McCarthy?

Not this year, he doesn't. He has one lose to a guy who was not believed to be the starter.

I do not think any of them are rostered yet. I think they are hoping for both of them by second semester.

That is an odd take. He has exactly the resume after beating #6 and then #1.

That is certainly possible. However, it seems self defeating for WWE to pull a publicity stunt and then bury him in house shows thereby effectively wasting the stunt. On the other hand, the weird thing where they streamed his "announcement" seems to exactly fitting that mold.

Love me some ill tempered ungulates.

seems right

If you are not understanding it correctly, then neither am I. I had the same thought about seeding.

The part I still do not get is qualifying for the world team and then not going. The theory is that WWE stopped him, which explains the not going part, but fails to explain the qualifying part. To then be dropped down to the deepest backwaters of non-televised, non-recorded, almost non-existent WWE is just confounding. And I get that these are all outcome based judgements. He certainly would not have expected this outcome when he made his decision. But given the outcome, I have to wonder if he regrets his decision. Qualifying for the world championships might suggest the answer is yes.

I included Retherford's one year at 141 in the totals. But if you give 141 credit for what Retherford did at 149, then 149 becomes weaker than 133. And if you use the same logic for Molinaro, 149 becomes weaker than 125. I do not factor Gilman in because if there was any growth it happened post-collegiately which makes it real hard to compare baby face Gilman to the current version.

Persuasive.

I think a lot of these numbers are urban legend.