Jump to content

Wrestleknownothing

Members
  • Posts

    10,189
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    137

Everything posted by Wrestleknownothing

  1. I was all in on Diakomihalis and Lee winning their fourth last year and I am all in on Starocci and Brooks winning their fourth this year.
  2. I see Musk has reinstated Alex Jones and did it by hosting a live chat with Jones, Andrew Tate, and Vivek Ramaswamy. I cannot bring myself to download or use Twitter, but I also cannot look away from the slow motion car crash that is Musk's ownership of the platform.
  3. This one hasn't even been taken up by the Republican controlled House, never mind made it to the Senate. It has sat in committee for the past three months because Boebert is such a nut job that her own party does not take her seriously.
  4. I believe you are wrong. The first legislators to call for impeachment came a few months after he fired Comey, claiming obstruction of justice.
  5. Nice Federalist Papers call out. I own a copy. A key phrase that you did not highlight above is " acts committed by public officials that inflict severe harm on the constitutional order" and I have not seen that here. There are certainly accusations of that in the many posts claiming that Joe Biden helped Hunter Biden in his business dealings in a way that is out of bounds while in elected office. Mitt Romney, having seen more of this than any of us here, does not see evidence supporting that stance. Maybe he is right. Comer and Jordan both keep saying or implying they have the evidence, but they have been saying that so long without producing any of it, that they no longer seem credible to me. As for the turn this thread took yesterday where potentially impeachable offenses were replaced with arguments for impeachment that were things like, "look at all the illegal immigrants streaming over the border", there is just no way that subjective statement rises anywhere near the level of "sever harm on the constitutional order" even if it turns out to be true.
  6. You eat very well.
  7. I had seen this a few years ago, too. Nice update. I like people who say yes. I need to be more of a yes person.
  8. The Glenbard North to Penn State via transfer has been done before. See Cortez, Jered.
  9. I forgot about that. It was soooo cringy. A very bad look for him and Askren.
  10. I think this sums up the arguments for impeachment in this thread.
  11. I was not one of those folks. As a matter of fact, Hunter is so damaged that nothing he is found guilty of will surprise me. And if he pulls his father down with him he would not be the first addict to destroy his family.
  12. When you guys were making the case Biden, Joe and Hunter, had done illegal things, it was at least interesting to read, but now that you are arguing border policies are impeachable....you have reached a level of desperation that favors hope over logic.
  13. I know this is an unpopular take in this thread, but that is up to Trump. Republicans have a majority in the House. So if he gets impeached even once, then something has gone horribly, Trump-ian, wrong.
  14. Also, nope. They were highly specific charges even if there was no way he would be convicted. This idea that a president's policies are somehow impeachable is so much mental masturbation.
  15. Nope, nope, nope. You guys should really read up on impeachment. What part of "legally" doing something or hypothetically doing some future non-impeachable thing, is impeachable?
  16. These are reasons to not vote for Biden in the next election. These are not impeachable in any way. I am a little surprised and a lot disappointed this is your argument for impeachment.
  17. Ditto. Have become a cordless convert. And when I built a house this year I noticed every contractor had at least some cordless tools.
  18. Hypothetical? No, this is right there with death and taxes.
  19. Let's hope so. Too exciting to not wrestle.
  20. Brooks being in his fifth season is like taking a redshirt. He won't get a sixth year. No different than Sanderson taking a redshirt and then going four for four. Starocci did take a redshirt. If he goes four for his first four it is the same as anyone else. It is really just his fifth title that would be tainted by the fact that only he and all the other 2021 freshman (true or redshirt) got five chances. So if they each win their fourth this year it isn't because of any extra chances.
  21. Or at least there should be. While we have all been warned ad nauseum, that past performance does not guarantee future results, you never hear future performance does not guarantee past results. Why is that? Clearly it is a conspiracy against wrestlers of an early age. Well, I am here to shatter that illusion at great personal risk to myself. Damn the torpedoes... In the freshman eligible eras there were 19 wrestlers who went X, 1, 1, 1. Of those 19 only 5, or 26.3%, filled in the X the right way, with the freshman win. In the non-freshman eligible eras there were 16 wrestlers who went N/A, 1, 1, 1. So without question 4.2 of them would have won it as freshmen had they been eligible because math. Since King Solomon don't live round here, which four are you picking?
  22. Have to add my man Mike Macchiavello to the list. On FRL they referred to him as the nicest man in wrestling. That he once gave my wife and I credit for his NCAA title doesn't hurt his case either.
  23. NC State. In the six years prior to Pat Popolizio taking the helm at NC State their average finish at the NCAA tournament was 39.5. Since he took over ten years ago they averaged 17.4, but in the last five years their average placement has been 9.4. This year they are projected to finish runners up. Prior to Popolizio, NC State had 3 AAs in six years. After Popolizio they nearly average 3 AA's per year (2.7). This year they should have 4 or 5 AAs.
×
×
  • Create New...