Ok, so you are predicting three. What are the probabilities you assign to 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 champs today?
Presumably 3 will be your highest, but not 100%. Or maybe it will
Yeah, but think of the money he saved by not paying the severance he agreed to pay to the people he laid off.
I cannot think of a sadder existence than Twitter corporate counsel right now. Your job is to try and screw a bunch of laid off programmers out of tens of thousands of dollars at the behest of the second richest person in the world.
Before loosing Heinselman and Vasquez OSU and ASU were 8th and 15th, respectively, when averaging across the three rakings services:
After loosing them they fall to... 8th and 15th?
Heinselman was worth 3.8 expected points, but OSU had a 5 expected points advantage over Michigan going in.
Vasquez was worth 1.2 expected points, but ASU had a 1.8 expected points advantage over UNI going in.
If you two don't know, what chance does someone like me have?
Edit: I take that back. I just watched in slo mo. THAT IS A FREAKIN SWIMMING MOVE. I may be a wrestler after all.
I had not read it, but just did now. It is not wrong. By one, common, legally required standard Twitter was not profitable. I am just saying that is not the only, or commonly used measure. But there is no point for the WSJ to get into subtleties on a supporting point to a broader story.