Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
22 hours ago, WrestlingRasta said:

Your understanding of the english language fails you yet again.  I can only try to help you so much brother.   You have to actually want to do better, in order to do better. 

According to YOUR view of what "better" is?  And you are who again who gets to make that determination?

Posted
3 hours ago, Bigbrog said:

According to YOUR view of what "better" is?  And you are who again who gets to make that determination?

I'm just simple 'ole me.. And I feel pretty confident that having a grasp on reading comprehension and understanding of the english language is better than......not.  

But thanks for asking.  Did something I said to cav trigger you?

Posted

The $100 million raised by the FireAid benefit concert was distributed to over 160 nonprofits, rather than directly to individual Pacific Palisades wildfire survivors, according to reports in 2025. Funds aimed to support long-term recovery via grants to organizations focused on housing, food assistance, mental health, and community rebuilding

Posted
28 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

Thing about articles like that is.  0 lefties on here will acknowledge that was a bad thing that should not happen.  
 

Almost cult like behavior.

For the lefties that won’t click the link :

Judicial Watch Lawsuit Settlement Causes Review and Removal of 800,000 Ineligible Voters from Oregon Voter Rolls

PR

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced a settlement in its federal lawsuit against Oregon election officials, which confirms 800,000 ineligible voter names are slated for review and removal from voter registration lists. The settlement requires state officials to produce detailed data and enforce federal voter roll clean-up procedures under the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA).

  • Wrestle +1 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Caveira said:

Thing about articles like that is.  0 lefties on here will acknowledge that was a bad thing that should not happen.  
 

Almost cult like behavior.

For the lefties that won’t click the link :

 

Judicial Watch Lawsuit Settlement Causes Review and Removal of 800,000 Ineligible Voters from Oregon Voter Rolls

PR

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced a settlement in its federal lawsuit against Oregon election officials, which confirms 800,000 ineligible voter names are slated for review and removal from voter registration lists. The settlement requires state officials to produce detailed data and enforce federal voter roll clean-up procedures under the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA).

This is great news for OR.   Now do this in WA please.  

mspart

Posted
3 hours ago, mspart said:

This is great news for OR.   Now do this in WA please.  

mspart

She seems to have other things to worry about lol 

 

 

Posted

Yes, she is a real piece of work.   Had to have mom and dad pay for day care for her child because she did not make enough to do so.   No shame in that sort of.   But to ask to run a whole city when you can't even run your own life, and they voted her in knowing all this.   Just unbelievable.  

She and zambimi cut from the same cloth. 

mspart

Posted

The judges are in on it.  Maybe they don't get the money directly but their JOB is to enforce the law so that law abiding citizens have faith that our system is fair and honest.  Judges letting offenders go shows no judgment and breaks down trust in institutions.  This is a bit of a long read but it goes a bit into the why of the fraud being tolerated.  Disheartening.

https://www.city-journal.org/article/california-in-home-supportive-services-program-ihss-fraud

People who tolerate me on a daily basis . . . they are the real heroes.

Posted

The trump ballroom which was promised to be paid by private donors at a cost of $400 million is now being proposed in a bill by the gop as being funded by $1 billion of tax payer money. How did the cost go up over 100 % when tax payer money is being considered?

Posted
18 hours ago, braves121 said:

The trump ballroom which was promised to be paid by private donors at a cost of $400 million is now being proposed in a bill by the gop as being funded by $1 billion of tax payer money. How did the cost go up over 100 % when tax payer money is being considered?

b/c the govt got involved.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...