Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Just caught this one on another social media sites. It's what people are saying.

I don't know if it's true - but if you look at the pictures... he/she does appear to be a non-binary manly gent.

(Not that there's anything wrong with that.)

BB1ofoGr.img?w=768&h=512&m=6&x=2199&y=73

Edited by RockLobster
  • Poopy 1
Posted
9 hours ago, RockLobster said:

(Not that there's anything wrong with that.)

 

8 hours ago, headshuck said:

Anything is possible.

 

6 hours ago, RockLobster said:

Indeed.

rock_lobster_by_imaginenationag_d2jx152-

.

Posted
9 hours ago, RockLobster said:

Just caught this one on another social media sites. It's what people are saying.

I don't know if it's true - but if you look at the pictures... he/she does appear to be a non-binary manly gent.

(Not that there's anything wrong with that.)

BB1ofoGr.img?w=768&h=512&m=6&x=2199&y=73

This is a shit post

  • Bob 3

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
15 hours ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

This is a shit post

Are you sure? Think about it.

I didn't make an absolute claim. Just a perspective based on internet input and a photo.

Judging it as 'shit' doesn't follow any logical assessment.

Unless I'm missing something - in which case, feel free to enlighten me.

  • Poopy 1
Posted
5 hours ago, RockLobster said:

Are you sure? Yes Think about it. I obviously did already.

I didn't make an absolute claim. yes, you did, you just did it in the most sniveling, cowardly way possible. Just a perspective based on internet input and a photo. Yeah, a shit perspective.

Judging it as 'shit' doesn't follow any logical assessment. Yes, it does. That you fail to see the logic, or worse yet, absolutely see the logic but claim not to, does not change that.

Unless I'm missing something - in which case, feel free to enlighten me. Gee whiz, guys. I'm not saying RockLobster is full of shit, I am just asking if he is full of shit based on internet input.

 

  • Bob 1
  • Fire 1
  • Poopy 1

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
17 hours ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

Are you sure? Yes Think about it. I obviously did already.

I didn't make an absolute claimyes, you did, you just did it in the most sniveling, cowardly way possible. Just a perspective based on internet input and a photo. Yeah, a shit perspective.

Judging it as 'shit' doesn't follow any logical assessment. Yes, it does. That you fail to see the logic, or worse yet, absolutely see the logic but claim not to, does not change that.

Unless I'm missing something - in which case, feel free to enlighten me. Gee whiz, guys. I'm not saying RockLobster is full of shit, I am just asking if he is full of shit based on internet input.

So here we go:

  1. I didn't make an absolute claim - I really didn't. As much as you dislike it (which appears to be quite a lot), that doesn't change the fact that it wasn't an "absolute claim.". Not at all. Your emotions won't change that fact.
    (Your post is eerily similar to MAGA type posters. Which you really should be head and shoulders above.)
  2. Judging it as 'shit' doesn't follow - and it just does not. I see what you think of as logic here. It's not logical. You don't have to be a woman to carry a baby. It's uncommon to carry as a man, but it does happen.
  3. Calling out the 'internet input' for opinions from random dopes is interesting. Useless, but interesting.

Ionel had it 100% right in the 4th post above:

  1. This was a political theater post. Just as you might see from Fox News or any other crappy sources.
  2. No basis in fact, just enough (she does look beefy) that it will sell to folks looking for something like it. And just enough crazy that the angry wingnuts looking for something like it can latch on to it.

What the point is:

  1. It is incredibly easy to post simple little false things to tap into the methods that Fox News, political theater specialists, and increasingly more and more foreign influencers use to gain attention and influence people.
  2. All they need is:
    1. A small grain of truth
    2. An imaginative storyline of nonsense
    3. A way to tie the two together in a way that seems believable, at least enough for some
    4. Folks (unfortunately mostly older folks) who aren't carefully considering their news sources

Let's be honest - in the picture, she does look quite like a manly gent. If she were to come out later...

 

 

  • Poopy 1
Posted

RL definitely is BB.  Not only are his post crap, but they are hilariously stupid...all one has to do is claim WKN is a mega to show how stupid you are.

  • Bob 1
  • Fire 2
Posted
7 hours ago, RockLobster said:

So here we go:

  1. I didn't make an absolute claim - I really didn't. As much as you dislike it (which appears to be quite a lot), that doesn't change the fact that it wasn't an "absolute claim.". Not at all. Your emotions won't change that fact.
    (Your post is eerily similar to MAGA type posters. Which you really should be head and shoulders above.)
  2. Judging it as 'shit' doesn't follow - and it just does not. I see what you think of as logic here. It's not logical. You don't have to be a woman to carry a baby. It's uncommon to carry as a man, but it does happen.
  3. Calling out the 'internet input' for opinions from random dopes is interesting. Useless, but interesting.

Ionel had it 100% right in the 4th post above:

  1. This was a political theater post. Just as you might see from Fox News or any other crappy sources.
  2. No basis in fact, just enough (she does look beefy) that it will sell to folks looking for something like it. And just enough crazy that the angry wingnuts looking for something like it can latch on to it.

What the point is:

  1. It is incredibly easy to post simple little false things to tap into the methods that Fox News, political theater specialists, and increasingly more and more foreign influencers use to gain attention and influence people.
  2. All they need is:
    1. A small grain of truth
    2. An imaginative storyline of nonsense
    3. A way to tie the two together in a way that seems believable, at least enough for some
    4. Folks (unfortunately mostly older folks) who aren't carefully considering their news sources

Let's be honest - in the picture, she does look quite like a manly gent. If she were to come out later...

 

 

Oh, I get what you were claiming to attempt to do, but your last sentence reveals the lie.

Shit is shit. You can polish the turd, make it shiny and pretty, but it is still shit.

  • Bob 1
  • Fire 1

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
1 hour ago, Bigbrog said:

RL definitely is BB.  Not only are his post crap, but they are hilariously stupid...all one has to do is claim WKN is a mega to show how stupid you are.

we call that a ploy

  • Bob 1

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted

Is it true rock lobsters are nasty creatures and know nothings know more than you think?  🤔

  • Bob 1
  • Poopy 1

.

Posted
15 hours ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

Oh, I get what you were claiming to attempt to do, but your last sentence reveals the lie.

Shit is shit. You can polish the turd, make it shiny and pretty, but it is still shit.

The last sentence:

"Let's be honest - in the picture, she does look quite like a manly gent. If she were to come out later..."

Let's dissect this:

  1. Let's be honest - honesty is always the best approach
  2. In the picture, she does look quite like a manly gent - she 100% does. 
  3. If she were to come out later... - not claiming she used to be a he, but if it came out later... no surprise.

Don't see any "shit" here - just a simple post with logical analysis.

Seems you have some kind of weird personal problem in this case that skews your posting.

There is nothing about my post that was shit - check yourself.

  • Poopy 2
Posted
On 6/18/2024 at 1:17 AM, RockLobster said:

The last sentence:

"Let's be honest - in the picture, she does look quite like a manly gent. If she were to come out later..."

Let's dissect this:

  1. Let's be honest - honesty is always the best approach
  2. In the picture, she does look quite like a manly gent - she 100% does. 
  3. If she were to come out later... - not claiming she used to be a he, but if it came out later... no surprise.

Don't see any "shit" here - just a simple post with logical analysis.

Seems you have some kind of weird personal problem in this case that skews your posting.

There is nothing about my post that was shit - check yourself.

Rock - You just missed the mark on the troll post.  It's all good.  Just take the L... Myself and many others have had it happen to us.  Personally when looking at the photo a clever bit on botox would've been the avenue I would've taken

  • Bob 1

I Don't Agree With What I Posted

Posted
14 hours ago, PortaJohn said:

Rock - You just missed the mark on the troll post.  It's all good.  Just take the L... Myself and many others have had it happen to us.  Personally when looking at the photo a clever bit on botox would've been the avenue I would've taken

Except that I don't dislike her - I don't personally know her at all. And I wasn't trolling. She genuinely looks like a man. How is that hard to understand?

Anyone who looks at the original picture I posted with any sense of the current transgender 'chaos' would think the same.

She's as beefy man looking as any transgender swimmer in the country.

It's not a condemnation of her, it's just a reality check to think twice before judging a person based on how they look.

  • Poopy 1
Posted

The photo you posted was heavily edited to make her muscles bulge. Similar to what they did to some wrestlers a few years ago to make them look tough.

Posted
11 hours ago, RockLobster said:

Except that I don't dislike her - I don't personally know her at all. And I wasn't trolling. She genuinely looks like a man. How is that hard to understand?

Depends on what you are comparing to don't ya think?

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSaeJJFJhh704vfaU9lkmJ

11 hours ago, RockLobster said:

 

She's as beefy man looking as any transgender swimmer in the country.

 

Beefy ... you want beefy?

woman-3.jpg

.

Posted

Women were rough back in the day. 

Personally, I think this was RL trolling looking for a response.   He got one so he should be more than satisfied. 

mspart

Posted
On 6/20/2024 at 9:54 AM, headshuck said:

The photo you posted was heavily edited to make her muscles bulge. Similar to what they did to some wrestlers a few years ago to make them look tough.

Nope, not at all.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Rankings

  • College Commitments

    Charlie Scanlan

    Bethlehem Catholic, Pennsylvania
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Columbia
    Projected Weight: 157

    Paris Kelleher

    Princeton, Texas
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Central Methodist (Women)
    Projected Weight: 145

    Megan Preston

    Wiregrass Ranch, Florida
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Tiffin (Women)
    Projected Weight: 160, 180

    Brady Knaupp

    Greens Farms Academy, Connecticut
    Class of 2025
    Committed to NYU
    Projected Weight: 133

    Nate Faxon

    Governor Livingston, New Jersey
    Class of 2025
    Committed to NYU
    Projected Weight: 197, 285
×
×
  • Create New...