peanut Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 Who wins, 2002 Sanderson or 2024 Brooks? In 2002, Sanderson won his fourth NCAA title at 197, was the NCAA tournament's outstanding wrestler, and won the Hodge. Ditto for 2024 Brooks. So who wins? Before you answer, consider that 2024 Brooks has 2024 Sanderson in his corner. If anyone can figure out a way for 2024 Brooks to beat 2002 Sanderson, it's 2024 Sanderson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hammerlock3 Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 sanderson's motion was way better (best ever), he knew way way way more positions, his forward pressure didn't require standing on train tracks (more of a zig zag), way better on top (maybe a wash because no one is getting ridden), but the big thing to me is that he seemed reckless while always in control...the guy was scary, brook is just really good. 1 "Half measures are a coward's form of insanity." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ionel Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 Just now, Hammerlock3 said: sanderson's motion was way better (best ever), he knew way way way more positions, his forward pressure didn't require standing on train tracks (more of a zig zag), way better on top (maybe a wash because no one is getting ridden), but the big thing to me is that he seemed reckless while always in control...the guy was scary, brook is just really good. ^^^ this ^^^ Cael was always moving, continual motion, he'd just be rolling with the opponent picking up back points etc you'd look at the clock and he'd have 4.5 min of riding time and it just looked effortless. Also Cael isn't a good enough coach to teach anyone how to beat him. 1 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
headshuck Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 2003 or 2004 Damion Hahn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hammerlock3 Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 5 minutes ago, headshuck said: 2003 or 2004 Damion Hahn he's more clutch than Brooks or sanderson...also had a lot more practice at it. "Half measures are a coward's form of insanity." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NM1965 Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 Sanderson would be too slick for Brooks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrestle87 Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 I think '02 Trenge gives brooks a real run for his money. Some of those '97's in that era were absolute monsters. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JuanMogen Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 You trying to make baby Jesus cry with this thread? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NM1965 Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 7 minutes ago, JuanMogen said: You trying to make baby Jesus cry with this thread? Nobody wants that. If you make baby Jesus cry you'll have to deal with the entire PSU team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackwebster Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 (edited) 7 hours ago, ionel said: he'd just be rolling with the opponent picking up back points I was recently rewatching his finals, and he would tilt with what looked like a hug, like he just gently wraps his arms around the dude -- no lock -- and leans over. Crazy. Edited April 5 by jackwebster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nhs67 Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 8 hours ago, Hammerlock3 said: sanderson's motion was way better (best ever), he knew way way way more positions, his forward pressure didn't require standing on train tracks (more of a zig zag), way better on top (maybe a wash because no one is getting ridden), but the big thing to me is that he seemed reckless while always in control...the guy was scary, brook is just really good. I will see your 2002 Sanderson motion and raise you the 2024 Sanderson sequencing. 1 "I know actually nothing. It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jchapman Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 Sanderson Craig Henning got screwed in the 2007 NCAA Finals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
11986 Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 Ditka Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hammerlock3 Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 4 hours ago, nhs67 said: I will see your 2002 Sanderson motion and raise you the 2024 Sanderson sequencing. oh man if only he'd known about sequencing back in the day.....all those matches he tried something and it didn't work so he just quit for the rest of the match would have been way different. 1 1 "Half measures are a coward's form of insanity." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackwebster Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 5 hours ago, nhs67 said: I will see your 2002 Sanderson motion and raise you the 2024 Sanderson sequencing. Can you explain "sequencing" so I can get the joke? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gromit Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 37 minutes ago, jackwebster said: Can you explain "sequencing" so I can get the joke? 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nhs67 Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 OMG. YES. "I know actually nothing. It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PortaJohn Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 I think Cael vs AB is much closer to a toss up than what most would like to believe. The year prior down at 184 Cormier gave the mythical Cael quite a scrap and got a takedown in the 3rd to make it a 1 point match prior to Daniel having a brain fart and giving up the reversal. If Cael wrestled AB in their primes 10 times I wouldn't be surprised if they split. AB is going into WTT as an underdog to DT and although unlikely most won't or shouldn't find it shocking if he pulled off taking the spot. That's how good he is I Don't Agree With What I Posted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D3UC157 Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 Sanderson converts an ankle pick, escape, exchange escapes. 4-2 or 3-2 depending on scoring era. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrestle87 Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 3 hours ago, PortaJohn said: I think Cael vs AB is much closer to a toss up than what most would like to believe. The year prior down at 184 Cormier gave the mythical Cael quite a scrap and got a takedown in the 3rd to make it a 1 point match prior to Daniel having a brain fart and giving up the reversal. If Cael wrestled AB in their primes 10 times I wouldn't be surprised if they split. AB is going into WTT as an underdog to DT and although unlikely most won't or shouldn't find it shocking if he pulled off taking the spot. That's how good he is I'm not disagreeing for the sake of disagreeing, but cormier had five seconds of success in that entire match off a snapdown go behind, cael was in on his legs that entire match. Cael didn't do a great job finishing that, but that's a match cormier loses 19/20 times, maybe 29/30 times, the one standalone being him just bullrushing and getting a throw for points or a pin. It was the closest match he had in the finals...maybe in college even, but the match was not close. Cael had a number of leg attacks that were deep but he ran out of time on or got stalemated. I would also put DC in there as a guy who could give brooks a run for his money. DC lacked the leg offense to do anything purposeful against super top tier guys, but dude was a brooks level bruiser. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VakAttack Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 I'm usually the guy to favor the newer era, but in folkstyle, Cael was just different than anybody we've seen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ionel Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 4 hours ago, PortaJohn said: I think Cael vs AB is much closer to a toss up than what most would like to believe. The year prior down at 184 Cormier gave the mythical Cael quite a scrap and got a takedown in the 3rd to make it a 1 point match prior to Daniel having a brain fart and giving up the reversal. If Cael wrestled AB in their primes 10 times I wouldn't be surprised if they split. AB is going into WTT as an underdog to DT and although unlikely most won't or shouldn't find it shocking if he pulled off taking the spot. That's how good he is Nope! First off Brooks is too short and second ... well just plain no. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mspart Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 1 hour ago, wrestle87 said: I'm not disagreeing for the sake of disagreeing, but cormier had five seconds of success in that entire match off a snapdown go behind, cael was in on his legs that entire match. Cael didn't do a great job finishing that, but that's a match cormier loses 19/20 times, maybe 29/30 times, the one standalone being him just bullrushing and getting a throw for points or a pin. It was the closest match he had in the finals...maybe in college even, but the match was not close. Cael had a number of leg attacks that were deep but he ran out of time on or got stalemated. I would also put DC in there as a guy who could give brooks a run for his money. DC lacked the leg offense to do anything purposeful against super top tier guys, but dude was a brooks level bruiser. Since Cael never lost in college, I think Cormier loses 19/19 times or 29/29 times. Or 100/100 times. Cael did lose in FS a few matches, but never in college. He was dominant on top and rode like the wind. mspart 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PortaJohn Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 8 minutes ago, ionel said: Nope! First off Brooks is too short and second ... well just plain no. Are you dating Elizabeth Dole? I Don't Agree With What I Posted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ionel Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 1 minute ago, PortaJohn said: Are you dating Elizabeth Dole? Its my new Bob defense. No way he can mess with me now. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now