Husker_Du

i'm gonna tell you guys right now.... Jimmy Cinny will never be banned from here. He will always have a home. He's an All Star. bet welcher is your problem. not mine.

he'll be at 70. and all the PSU homies want him at 157 in college. that may be feasible for a year or two but aint no way he finishes his career there imo.

i don't think you have any reason to be on a great message board. plead your case.

this is the best thread topic of all time.

the way i read it, this is more about expediency than it is 'free speech', no? it seems like 'public input' in this case serves as red tape. i'm also not sure, but could lobbyists contribute to the problem in this scenario? also, is there another department that includes 'public input' in their process. seems weird in and of itself.

the kids basically admitted that they baited Anthony into reacting. and as to 'the people from the district' - i'm saying that anyone (especially adults) that shout slurs and obscenities to high school kids, are whack jobs.

idk what to tell ya. i think you're assuming some tone or emotion that just isn't there. there are some douchebag takes on here. that's all.

they're at the stage where they just come out and say it now. how many coal powered plants are China building this year? "China" and "Climate" don't go together.

fair point. normally nothing. but in this case, the role didn't exist. i realize both parties spend like nuts, but there is only one party that put in place a team to curb lesbian peacock research in Port-au-Prince and economic effects of climate change on sex workers in Thailand. honestly, we definitely win this one. smooch!

someone get me up to speed. what happened (or didn't happen) with this today?

you're taking this really hard. read thru the first couple pages of the thread. clearly some douchey comments. full of judgement. a few clearly with bias. There was even an article titled "The Rise and Sudden Fall of Anthony Knox" i mean, effin spare me the theatrics. bunch of dorks.

what's your point here? $175b vs $106b?

lol. i'm not gloating. i don't even think he should be allowed to wrestle. it's absurd. but so is the judgement and accusations and pearl clutching.

what a turn of events! lolololololol

this best sums up my thoughts

what radical changes? joy reid? and who is 'jumping ship'? i agree they haven't learned much. doubling down on the nonsense that made them lose to 'the worst presidential candidate in history' yet again. but i don't see this mass exodus you speak of

several Joe Biden speeches.

oversight like losing billions of dollars or oversight like being trillions in debt or oversight like not being able to pass an audit?

i know old man Knox pretty well. i guess it the comments on here just don't sit well with me. Several on here are making him out to be a jersey douche bag meat head that was looking for trouble and it's simply not the case. there were a bunch of idiots talking out their ass, like they have been for Anthony's whole career and the old man had enough and went to say something about it. he didn't fight. he didn't touch anyone. i'm not advocating for fighting, but i also can't say i wouldn't give someone a piece of my mind if they were doing the same to my family. and - this is mere speculation - but i doubt it crossed Mr. Knox's mind that it would escalate to that and that Anthony would get involved. anyway, again, to each their own. i probably shouldn't have said anything to begin with. but alas, it's a message board, and people talk out of their asses.

why is there outrage of 'personal liberty and free markets' lol

what the hell are you talking about?

you're making things up in your head again, Trip. they told you why - they didn't get them. that being said, they should have stfu until they had them. both sides have gotten in to the extraordinarily bad habit of trying to stir up as much media noise as possible over everything. just shut up and produce.

if ya wanna be judgmental dorks, have at it. to each their own.

please just make the gd data say he stalls so people can confirm their bias.

lol. why is this difficult? the one that everyone was ripping b/c he had no sleeves, tattoos, and an 'mma background' (even though that's not exactly accurate b/c his true background is bjj)