scourge165

No, not just all over his leg. This was more like going to bed drunk and just having a very explosive problem. It went everywhere. He was rolling in it all night, just...messed himself. All over the place. Rolling in it. He got some in his hair(which I picture to be like Spongebob), it's up and down his back, it's...a full on bio hazard. He'll need a whole team of people wearing the Ebola suits to come in there, pick him back up and clean him off while they do a controlled burn as it's...it's all ruined. What he left behind? I mean, in terms of just disasters, there's Palestine, Ohio and there's Jimmy right now and I don't know which was worse, but they were both bad. One was amusing to see. The other, not so much.

Well, @red vikingI don't agree with some of your takes here...which I think is actually more normal as...agreeing on everything and having the same talking points because we're both left of center makes us more of a cult...but at least we're never gonna sound as stupid as this ineffectual lil guy!

Red...c'mon man. First of all, HOW will it end in 21 months? You reaize it's VERY unlikely the Dems win the Senate, right? Michigan, Tillis in NC, there was one or two others that the Dems MIGHT win, but it's pretty unlikely. House, definitely gonna turn blue. It'd turn blue no matter who was POTUS with this margin. So...lets say they write a bill reclaiming control over tariffs. The Senate passes it along...and ya THINK Trump will sign it? Finally, it DOES sound like you're pulling for China, I don't know what it means you want "everyone to stand up to the Bully." THEY ARE THE FNING BULLY!!! Do you think Stealing intellectual property that cost you HUNDREDS of billions of dollars is alright? Currency manipulation that makes trade inherently unfair. And then more illegal things that are 100% traced back to the CCP as Russian Cororate espionage by the KGB was performed at the behest of the KGB, but...lets forget about that. And you hoping they can just outlie Trump...that IS you rooting against the United States. I couldn't have the guy more. I honestly couldn't. Nothing he can do will convince me he cares about others people or is a good guy. But if you're rooting for him to fail, it's leading for the US to fail and...now you're just as bad as him as you're making everything ALL about him. Just Trump. Trump wins or loses. They stood up to Trump and won. The effects on 340M Americans is ancillary? C'mon dude...you're better than that.

I would. Greco is less skilled Wrestling...IMO, I understand others feel VERY differently about this. Greco may be tougher...

Yes...wanting to exist is...that's an issue. An entire REGION wishing for their elimination...so terrible. Hamas leadership calling for all Jews to return to Judea(not just the "Zionist," but EVERY-SINGLE-JEW. Why? It's easier to kill if they're all in one place. It's tragic that children are dying. It's tragic Hitler created the Hitler youth and so many children died in WWII. Oh, speaking of WWII, the Arabs in that region were allies with...who? It's the name mentioned above. They came up with the mobile crematoriums. They wanted the Jews evacuated from the Ottoman Empire called "Palestine." And the British... they split the land up. No unwringing that bell. But they gave each a chance to form a Govt. One did, one didn't. The one that didn't has been starting War after War after War for decades after decade... That's why we need the Iranian people...who...again, loved the West and were the more American-like Country in the Region, they need to step up and hopefully they can overthrow the Govt' and you eliminate the funds for the terrorists and they...stop having and raising kids so they can make them martyrs. By the way, in "Palestine," there were a whole lot of Jews there despite it not being anyone's Country. Though, if we play the game of "who was there first," the Jews win that one. But, ideally, you take Iran off the board in terms of funding them and UNRWA from the US and...they can reach a REAL peace deal. I'm ALSO rooting for...Trump to do that. Then he'd have accomplished something...as opposed to the "Abraham accords," which...actually only made things worse(though...this was happening either way). By the way ~75% of people in Palestine believe in apostasy. 72% of Palestinians and 82% in the West Bank approved of the Oct 7th attacks that left women raped, bloody, their naked bodies broken like dolls a child plays with, paraded through the streets. And THEN you have the fact that...like cockroaches, they scurry around underground and hide in places like...UNWRA refugee camps...where they also keep prisoners. Maybe not the family that they killed(ya know, the ones with the two little boys) but... "When they start loving their children more than they hate us." Sorry Red...I'm with you on a lot of things...this isn't one of them.

Yeah, dude...you're just wrong here. China is objectively worse in every possible way. TRUMP may be as bad as Xi, but Trump, like every POTUS is temporary(hopefully). China has been corrupt and they've been skirting international trade laws and the WTO rules forever. Xi said he's willing to go to War? Where? An ACTUAL War? That would hurt the United States and leave their Navy in ruins...and it'd COMPLETELY destroy the Chinese Military. China can't go to War and win. They made their move offering an alliance with Japan and SK, a separate one with India, but they all stayed with the US. This hurts the US without question, but...it hurts China at this point worse and AGAIN, why are you pulling for China? China acted first. Trump acted stupidly and went WAY over the top with his opening salvo and he's a moron and he's all those things....and his actions impact the United States so I hope he falls assbackwards into successful trade deals and what not. I have little confidence he will, but still.

It's so cute. It was almost as cute as when he tried to sound like an intellectual on the Trump tariff disaster!

Nothing has changed. You don't care that Trump hasn't done one of the main things he ran on, but you care that Biden...hasn't done one of the things HE campaigned on. (Biden also didn't try and put someone in his administration that gave Epstein free reign for the last decade of his life.)

Whaaaat a second! Now it's funny? Child abuse? I thought this was important to you? That's alright. Hey, by the way, any chance you have long arms, go about 6, 6'1 and you can track a ball well? As well as you can come out of a back peddle, we could use you at CB.

I'm...perfectly relaxed. Someone said they just did that in response to the tariffs. They "read it somewhere." That just sounds like it's not true and someone started it as a rumor. What about that isn't "relaxed" enough?

You elect a guy who was only really successful at being on TV and...this is what you get.

Well Jimmy... because that is a BIG part of what he ran on and the whole Qanon stuff. The cabal of Democrats who sacrifice babies. So...if there's truth to that, why WOULDN'T he fulfill his promise? Kinda feels like it was so important to him that he win so he DIDN'T have it released? Kinda fits with why he tried to appoint the guy(Alex Acosta) who stepped in and gave Epstein a deal behind the backs of Prosecutors already working on the case, to Labor Secratary. Alex Acosta’s decision to grant immunity to all "potential co-conspirators" in the 2008 plea deal with Jeffrey Epstein has been one of the most controversial aspects of the case. So a Federal Prosecutor steps in, grants this immunity(which was unprecedented)...gives Epstein a cupcake sentence and then Trump tries to put him in his cabinet.

And again, this sounds like it's made up without a source. I also can't find any reference of it...or real point as the tariffs were very small going both ways. This absolutely feels like something someone made up on Facebook, then people see it and they start saying, 'did you see what China is doing.' But if anyone finds it, let me know.

I disagree. I think he cares VERY much about it. He'll say he doesn't and he'll declare it a win no matter what. 'They say no matter what the party in office loses the midterms....but we lost by fewer seats than maybe anyone in history. Nobody thought we would do so well in the midterms...and we would have done better if they would have listened to me. I told(whomever loses) he should have listened to me, but now look at him.' -Trump after losing 80 seats in the House and 10 in the Senate. So yes, he'll say that no matter what and pretend, but...we know he cares. That said, I remember when Obama used Executive Orders for their intended purpose and people threw a fit. That's the only way Trump Governs now. And this one, it's not actually relevant, but I wonder...if you gave truth serum to people, how many would say Trump is really just...a moron. Not like a...Desanto or Josh Hawley or Ted Cruz, people we don't like but who are clearly intelligent, but someone they wanted to win, but they knew he isn't very smart?

No. Wrong. The President, despite what Republicans argued for 4 years, cannot bring charges or instruct the AG to do so. Merrick Garland didn't do so for the EXACT same reason HE was the Judge the Republicans have specifically cited as the moderate that Obama should nominate, "but he won't nominate someone like Garland," said Lindsay 'theys just my 'lil butterflies- Graham. They didn't do it because they were spineless. They didn't want it to look like they were going after political enemies and...in the end, that's what they were accused of anyway. And then Trump literally came out and said that's what he planned to do(again) and we'll see if he does it this time. But saying it was because of Biden? No, he stayed out of it as he should have.

Ok...well, too bad more people didn't have this take. I think you make a good point though. I think Trump should have been charged...here's why he wasn't; Legal and Evidentiary Challenges: Narrow Legal Definition: The statute for insurrection has a specific and narrow definition, historically applied to cases involving external rebellion against the government. Applying this statute to a sitting president's actions presented unprecedented legal challenges. The Atlantic First Amendment Concerns: Much of the evidence against Trump involved public statements and speeches. Prosecutors were cautious about pursuing charges that could be perceived as infringing upon First Amendment rights, which protect freedom of speech. Lack of Direct Evidence: While there was evidence suggesting Trump's indirect encouragement of the Capitol attack, establishing direct involvement or intent to incite violence is a higher legal threshold that prosecutors may have found challenging to meet. The Atlantic Strategic Prosecutorial Decisions: Focus on Other Charges: Special Counsel Jack Smith opted to pursue charges that were more straightforward to prove, such as conspiracy to defraud the United States and obstruction of an official proceeding. These charges were deemed to have a higher likelihood of success in court. The Atlantic Risk of Legal Precedent: Charging a former president with insurrection would have been unprecedented and carried significant legal and political implications. Prosecutors may have been concerned about setting a challenging precedent and the potential for protracted legal battles.

Nonsense. Just..more nonsense. And people were already under the risk of perjury and caught lying. By the way, I got mine in a large envelope...so I never folded it AND I returned it to a drop box near my polling center. So mine had no creases. Keep grasping at straws to justify Trump trying to circumvent the will of the people. But, lets fact check this claim(yet again). The claim that mail-in ballots from the 2020 U.S. presidential election were received without creases, suggesting they were never folded for mailing, has been investigated and found to lack credible evidence. Mail-in ballots are typically folded to fit into envelopes for mailing; therefore, a ballot without creases would be unusual. However, multiple audits and reviews of the 2020 election, including those conducted in key states, have consistently upheld the integrity of the mail-in voting process and found no evidence of widespread fraud. For instance, an Associated Press investigation into allegations of counterfeit ballots in Georgia found no evidence to support such claims. Similarly, other fact-checking organizations have debunked various allegations of mail-in ballot fraud. These findings indicate that claims about mail-in ballots without creases being evidence of fraud are unfounded.

Yeah...that part in bold just gives away how you claim people would have been SO outraged if the plan that Trump came up with happened. There was no rigging. I don't know what article you're referring to and I don't care. The DOJ under BILL BARR...he's the guy who chose to let everyone under Reagan off the hook. You remember, the guns, the cocaine...all to fund the Contras? "Georgia is a big deal." I mean...sure. It's a big state. It was a big deal when Trump lost(though he still loses with or without it). And then when both Democrats won the Senate seats... But yeah, I saw way more of your a$$ than I wanted to when you talked about how people wouldn't have Stood for the very thing that Trump tried to do and then just...defended the idea of doing EXACTLY that with nonsense. You're a little behind brother. Georgia was worse than claimed. Trump asked the MAGA Secretary of State and the MAGA Governor, both of whom supported him, he asked very publicly if they would rig the election for him. That case SHOULD have been heard. Yeah. Again, gotta agree here. When Trump kept stalling and the courts let it happen, that IS better than him being the first person to stop the peaceful transfer of power. Trump was a traitor who put self interests above the United States. That's it. That's the bottom line. And there are people demented enough that they'll argue in the same thread that nobody would have stood by and watched him pull off his plan that ONLY Mike Pence ws there to stop, even Republicans...while then advocating for that plan.

LOL...that's it? I assumed you made the mistake of sharing something more personal than that like I did, but just your Fiancé makes a good income? That's some insecurity to bring that up.

Did you see the backlash? You think Trump wants to lose more seats in the midterm than they're already going to? Risk the Senate? They're not going back to the blanket tariffs. Even Trump isn't that dumb. He just saw it nearly decimate the economy in less than a week. You had small businesses actually already go out of business(if Ron Johnson is to be believed). That's why I'm confident about that. Even the tariffs he has in place now, I'm going to guess they get resolved(there are some really dumb ones in place).

Oh...ok...so you think it was rigged, but you ALSO don't think people would have objected to Trump having stayed in power on Jan6th had Pence accepted the illegal electorates? That's some...impressive mental gymnastics. Is there really anything more you believe we can get out of this conversation?

Awesome. They said the Ballots were too neatly folded. It suggests nonsense. Remember when that 79 year old women wasn't allowed to vote...and that was their big evidence and they held a whole press conference? Oh and the signature didn't match. That was a smoking gun! And then...turns...she was legally blind, the vote was for Trump and she'd just forgotten. Remember when they were bringing in "suitcases" of ballots...into the BALLOT room?

It's a bit amusing to me...yet again, when people talk about personal attacks on here...and yet, I've heard this one multiple times. What relevance is it to you how much his partner makes?

I don't think it's going to tank(though Trump does view business as a zero sum game and there are some...truly horrifying and despicable claims about him not paying small businesses money for small projects on his behalf, but large projects for them). But no, I don't think it's going to continue to tank. It overreacted to the news yesterday, it's correcting today. Trump HAS caused damage, but America's trade partners need us and it's not the EU vs Trump(speaking of which, the EU also paused tariffs). China and the US likely come to an agreement...and as long as Trump is diabused of this notion that a trade deficit means you're "losing" or "being screwed," then we'll be fine. And moreover, the GOP won't allow him to reimpose those tariffs. I would bet(in fact...I mostly have...putting most of my money back in yesterday and today) that we're around the bottom. The ONE thing that'd lead me to possibly side with you is the CPI. It bottomed out today. 2.4%(proof that Biden's policies REALLY were working extremely well...and also proof the damage he did by not honoring his word to be one term President). But I don't agree with this take by in large.

Ok. I didn't think you'd be among those who'd be passing off this election denialism but...here we go. You'd have taken to the streets in protest? But then when those people actually did, I mean...there was so much propaganda and it really wasn't that bad. There weren't even guns...when they arrested people later... Proof Trump KNEW he lost. Yes, several of former President Donald Trump's attorneys have acknowledged that they were aware he lost the 2020 election. For instance, during a press conference on August 3, 2023, Trump's attorney, Alina Habba, stated, "I think that everybody was made aware that he lost the election." UPROXX+1indy100+1 Additionally, Jenna Ellis, another attorney who represented Trump in his post-election challenges, admitted in March 2023 to misrepresenting evidence of election fraud. She acknowledged making false public statements, including claims that Trump had won the election and that it was "stolen" from him. The Hill+1Politico+1Wikipedia+1indy100+1 Furthermore, a federal judge noted that Trump signed legal documents challenging the 2020 election results that included voter fraud claims he knew to be false. AP News These admissions indicate that key members of Trump's legal team were aware that the election fraud claims lacked merit.