1032004

It’s not a whataboutism, I actually addressed the point: it’s legal, but it’s still silencing people. Several here like bringing up whataboutisms without actually addressing the point raised…like you did earlier

Conservatives: most government workers (well the ones that aren’t patriots) are worthless and won’t be able to get a job outside of the government Also conservatives: never underestimate the ability of government employees to pull off a highly sophisticated scam

(Flo rankings) 125 #20 Jordan 133 #19 Noto 141 #11 Lemley 149 #9 Paniro Johnson 157 #14 Scott 165 #5 Ramirez 174 #5 Norman 184 #4 McEnelly 197 #9 Salazar 285 #3 Hendrickson

Not what the thread is about. I believe that’s what Elon was trying to get at, but he lied by saying it’s more about “making sure they actually exist”

Yes, those are all fairly common forms of fraud. Much more common I’d bet then somehow having a fake job

Making up a fake company is a lot different than making up a fake person. How exactly would one pull this off? Wouldn’t these imaginary people have supervisors, so they’d need to be in on it?

lol

That’s the company the Eagles fan that harassed the female Packers fan worked for. We’ve come full circle

lol at calling that “litigating.” Pretty much all he was saying was that in the past Putin had not honored ceasefires. I watched the whole thing and Vance is definitely the reason it went south. He barely talked, and I think the second time he did was when he started complaining about Zelenskyy being disrespectful and “litigating,” and accusing him of not saying thank you during this specific meeting (which he did, so Vance was also wrong there). Zelenskyy was not disrespectful prior to that IMO, but he was after that when he made the implication that the US would get attacked if they didn’t stop Russia. That was the point that Trump rightfully got upset. But it probably doesn’t get to that point if Vance isn’t such a dbag.

It’s legal, but they’re still being silenced. Kinda like how it is legal for Facebook and Twitter to silence people.

Kasak

Article in the OP disagrees

The point is that this administration was trying to claim they were different…

No it was literally in the same sentence

I specifically said much of the money she receives for her work is donated to charity…

You guys really love your whataboutisms huh

Greta will be joined on board the boat by her father Svante Thunberg and filmmaker Nathan Grossman of B-Reel Films, who will document the journey. The boat will be captained by professional race skipper Boris Herrmann and Malizia team founder Pierre Casiraghi, who have donated their time and skills to help Greta cross the Atlantic without flying. The voyage is jointly organised by Greta, Team Malizia, and B-Reel Films.

Uh, this is a link to where her charity gives money to. Thanks for proving she’s not a grifter

No evidence, as expected

I’m still confused by the World Liberty one, was that the one where buyers were literally prevented from selling it?

Who do you think “pays her way” and please provide a source for this assertion

Doing a brief search it seemed like it was primarily her parents that paid her way

You may need to look up the definition of grifting and shilling. I’m honestly not too familiar with Thunberg as I don’t really pay attention to the climate nonsense. But it appears most of her expenses had been paid by her wealthy parents, and much of the money she receives for her work is donated to charity. So pretty much the opposite of a grifter. Funny that you call out “millions” of grifters, yet the singular example you chose to use isn’t even one.