Jump to content

1032004

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    7,990

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    17

 Content Type 

Everything posted by 1032004

  1. 1032004
    To make money for their business
  2. 1032004
    You’re really grasping at straws. Even if he was “directly involved,” are you saying only Democrats would help Africans immigrate to the US? I thought the right was OK with legal immigrants. Just not illegal ones.
  3. 1032004
    I didn’t deny either of those things. Although “direct involvement” with MAU is a stretch. He spoke during one virtual session.
  4. 1032004
    You know what also had 70 names? The “board” he was on. All Democrats according to you?
  5. 1032004
    Lolololol. Law enforcement specifically stated he had to look up their addresses, it’s not like these are all his pen pals. Good lord man, you are lost.
  6. 1032004
    I wasn’t speaking to his motives, just his background. What do you mean by a “contract list”? Please don’t tell me you mean “contact” and you think all those people were his accomplices. Law enforcement confirmed the list included names and addresses including of people that were attacked. They didn’t specifically call it a “hit list,” but the implication there is pretty obvious.
  7. 1032004
    Supposedly the R party said it was “private.” Not sure if the D party would know what he voted if he voted something other than D, but I presume they could check their own records to confirm he didn’t vote D. I saw some info but not 100% of the accuracy that actually said there were zero D votes in the primary of his district.
  8. 1032004
    UFC basically created an audience from nothing, it’s possible for a new sport to emerge. But I don’t see how that happens without major rule changes. Good luck explaining to casual viewers who “initiated the move,” or “not being passive isn’t about being aggressive, it’s about keeping your butt in the center,” or “the tie is broken by the guy who scored the most points with a single move”
  9. 1032004
    Welp, I think this is the nail in the coffin for the “he was a leftist” argument.
  10. 1032004
    People have really lost their minds. I even saw some people on X doubting Boelter was even pro life because “being pro life is inconsistent with being a murderer”
  11. 1032004
    Where did I say they couldn’t be? Are you denying that being pro-life is generally a characteristic of the right?
  12. 1032004
    Not 100%, but his brother claimed he did. https://apnews.com/article/pennsylvania-governor-mansion-fire-motive-cody-balmer-734827f6c29d7b3064af442e729d10d7?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=share
  13. 1032004
    Well there were none on this guy’s list of names, apparently. I didn’t “pawn off the No Kings flyers as nothing,” I pointed out that the other evidence is stronger. There are multiple possible explanations for why he would have those flyers and not be a leftist. Thanks for confirming I didn’t believe any lies!
  14. 1032004
    What lie did I believe?
  15. 1032004
    Why did you ask it as a question originally?
  16. 1032004
    Ok I gave in and watched it. I like how he says “he was registered as a Republican way back in 2004, who cares!” Yet I’m sure he probably believed his wife interned for Walz in 2010 and thought that backed up his claim.
  17. 1032004
    Hey @Caveira, here’s a new piece of information, regarding the “she voted with Republicans!” angle The official law enforcement press conference stated that Boelter had been planning this for months Yet Hortman’s “vote with Republicans” occurred last week. oopsie
  18. 1032004
    Sorry following up on this. So this dude thinks Boelter shooting someone was “a misdirection”?
  19. 1032004
    Looks like you care when you can blame violence on “left leaning whack jobs” (which of course is not true about the Trump shooter)
  20. 1032004
    That’s sad to hear. Did he have any arrests at Little Rock?
  21. 1032004
    Lol
  22. 1032004
    The difference is @El Luchador has believed lies, I didn’t.
  23. 1032004
    The right thinks she said “white girl” Many defenders think she said “whack call” I think a combo of both. “Whack, girl” (about the call)
  24. 1032004
    I agree, but I think you’re only saying that because you know he’s not leftist. There was definitely an element of both sides trying to blame it on the other from the start, but it was the right that quickly resorted to made up nonsense like “his wife interned for Walz!” and “both people he shot voted with Republicans!” Myself personally am more concerned with debunking lies than trying to pin it on a side (in fact I’ve said I’m not saying the guy was MAGA. But he wasn’t leftist).
  25. 1032004
    This happened like a month ago and no, I don’t think that’s what she said. Looked like she was angry about a ref’s call
×
×
  • Create New...