1032004

Probably more than the number of people using the word Nazi to describe an ad for jeans…

To clarify, your opinion of the Matt guy is that he’s a “nothing burger,” correct?

I’m guessing this is where “saw it on GMA”

Thank you for agreeing with me

Thank you for continuing to prove my point by primarily posting conservatives clipping these videos. Yes, there are some libs mad about this. But conservatives are talking about it more

I’m curious if he actually watched them, or if he just saw a clip of it from a conservative source

It’s not 99.9% obviously. But it’s probably like 70% IMO. @Caveira posting videos of a bunch of randos nobody knows is only proving the point.

You watch GMA and the Today show?

Are you predicting Obama gets charged with treason? I believe it’s the only possible charge they have available

Lol

Thanks for confirming her tweets get far more likes than CNN’s. No recent one has 40 btw. She just made one 10 minutes ago that already has over 250, so maybe you saw it when she first posted it. She has one from only 20 minutes ago with over 1,000 already. Again, CNN rarely tops 1,000 at all.

Some of these are wokesters complaining, but: 1) the Fox News one is complaining about the complaining 2) the e online one was completely unrelated 3) the cnbc one is talking about the American Eagle stock price rising

There are definitely some on the left (and some media outlets) saying it (which I agree is stupid), but this seems to be another case of conservatives making the counter outrage bigger than the original outrage. The only talk I’ve seen about this (in multiple places), is someone complaining about why there was outrage in the first place.

Your AI needs work. Again, I said “engagement,” not reach. I said this because of your comment about no one caring what she says. Despite having about 40x less x followers than CNN, she probably has more engagement. CNN’s posts rarely get over 1,000 likes. Of their last 20 tweets, the only post to get 1,000 likes was one about the UK recognizing a Palestinian state (2K). Loomer on the other hand has gotten over 1,000 likes on 16 of her last 20 posts, with as high as 32,000. So yeah, I guess I need to take out the “probably,” she gets more engagement than CNN on x. Maybe that’s because most CNN watchers are 75+ years old and don’t use a computer or smart phone, but if that’s the case then there was no harm in them saying “possibly white” when it was corrected shortly after. The problem with people like Loomer speculating about every attacker being a Muslim is that others on social media then run with it also.

I didn’t say followers, I said engagement. Engagement indicates that unfortunately, a lot of people do care what Laura Loomer has to say.

It’s good that apparently even you have limits. But she just helped get the top vaccine official at the FDA fired. And was previously an adviser to Trump. And doing a quick glance on average her x posts probably get more engagement than posts from CNN.

In the recent case of people like Laura Loomer assuming the Michigan stabber was a Muslim, there are some key differences: 1) Loomer said “highly likely,” which is a lot more confident than “possibly.” 2) Loomer followed her claims with statements like “deport them all” and “Muslim invaders have ruined our country.” Oh and btw, Loomer did it again here! Said the NYC shooter is “being described by witnesses as a Middle Eastern man.” Which is also more confident than “possibly.” She even tried to somehow tie this to Zohran Mamdani and claim he supports people killing cops, even though the shooter was from Las Vegas.

Do you know what the word “possibly” means?

You should probably learn who she is. She just got the top vaccine official at the FDA fired. Which I’m not happy about, he actually often pissed off people on both sides.

I think the hypothetical there was that PJ Duke could be that “soul”

Hasn’t it been said that Mesenbrink can probably make 157?

And spare me “bUt ShE oNlY sAiD ‘LiKeLy’”

What was interesting about this attack is that yet again, people including big follower accounts like Laura Loomer, tried placing the blame on the Muslim community based on the scantest of evidence. You’d think after all the egg on their face from the Vance Boelter situation, that the folks that did that would actually try to wait for some facts before showing their racism, but apparently not.

I think this is probably the best data point to indicate the 3 pt takedown may have resulted in less action. Thanks

No, not 100%.