1032004

He may have gotten it from this: https://247sports.com/college/ohio-state/board/101483/contents/6-ohio-state-at-pittsburgh-dec-13-2024-241891195/?page=3

Sealey should probably be his biggest target from PSU IMO

For some reason I thought Fish was more of a low risk guy, am I wrong on that? I know Hipolito’s style may have encouraged some of the craziness there but it almost seemed like Fish was going for just as much crazy stuff as Hipolito (even early in the match before he got down big)

OK so keep RPI, get rid of winning percentage

Have to think that (and maybe RPI) is a big reason why VT didn’t send out Mullen against Hendrickson. Why even have winning % as a criteria? It’s also rewarding guys who have a weak schedule even without ducking.

He did major the returning NCAA finalist as a true freshman before 3 pt takedowns

Did he remove any teams this week?

^. Needs to work on his gas tank though

I need to rewatch that 197 SV to see how close Smith was to getting the danger count(s). Also thought Fish may have been pinned on Hipolito’s first throw. But great showing by OSU.

Well Schultz lost to Hendrickson, so not necessarily. Probably have to call this a duck though

He’s been flipping recruits like crazy and will get more + more transfers. Might be the betting favorite for Forrest and Bassett currently.

Maybe, although I’m sure high school results will still be the basis for a lot of recruiting which will still encourage holdbacks. But could also help kids that don’t end up getting scholarships or mucho NIL bucks not be in so much debt when they graduate.

In addition to the other 10?

No because I said I think he gets majored.

11 weights? I’m in!

Very high chance those 7 will all be top 3 seeds. Taking a quick look at last year’s brackets, of the 30 1-3 seeds, I only see 4 that did not AA (Braeden Davis, Jackson Arrington, Julian Ramirez, and Yonger Bastida). So 87% of 1-3 seeds AA’d. There’s a small chance one of the 7 doesn’t AA, but IMO that chance is lower than 2 of the other 3 AA’ing

I use one and it’s hit or miss, but yeah that’s the most annoying thing about using an ad blocker. For this particular article and I believe NY Post most of the time it just gives me a message to say “continue without supporting us.”

Interesting development: 20 year old California man detained for allegedly plotting to commit a coordinated attack with Rupnow https://nypost.com/2024/12/19/us-news/california-man-detained-after-allegedly-plotting-coordinated-attack-with-wisconsin-school-shooter-natalie-samantha-rupnow/?utm_campaign=nypost&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social

Who was paying for the private schooling?

My understanding was this ruling only applies to Pavia…for now at least

Agree. Although on the subject of X and this shooting, they are blocking searches for Rupnow or Samantha Rupnow. Did the same with Colt Gray (edit: who was also initially accused of being trans only for later evidence to come out suggesting that he was actually anti-trans)

Both. They “wrestled” twice at CKLV. One 5-1 win for Schultz and one MFF for Schultz

What’s the word on McGonagle and Wolak? With them our (particularly McGonagle as having a better chance of winning), 3.5 feels high

A new product doesn’t automatically create new buyers, there has to be a demand for it. Just like creating a new weight class won’t automatically result in more participants. The two scenarios aren’t comparable anyway unless you’re talking about adding weights in total. As I said earlier, if anything you probably lose participants by losing a middle weight. Forget the official numbers but I think they’ve been posted previously showing that depth charts are pretty shallow at 197. I could certainly see guys who are 2nd string at 141/149 now become third string and then don’t think they’ll see much action so they quit. What’s your opinion on simply increasing 184 and 197? Seems like that would solve both issues of shrinking the gap to heavyweight as well as better aligning with the Olympic weights.