Trump's Incompetent Cabinet

[mspart]

5 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

An excellent nomination, I believe.  As an author of the Great Barrington Declaration he had a better understanding of the pathology than any of the people who were in authority.  Rather than listen to him, they censored him and tried to criminalize him.  Will he take Fauci’s place as the highest paid government employee?

Exactly what I've been saying the left and media was doing.   To anyone with any amount of intelligence, they could see through it.   It took some time but it appears the voting public saw through the smoke screen of lies and inuendo. 

mspart

[ionel]

1 hour ago, Offthemat said:

An excellent nomination, I believe.  As an author of the Great Barrington Declaration he had a better understanding of the pathology than any of the people who were in authority.  Rather than listen to him, they censored him and tried to criminalize him.  Will he take Fauci’s place as the highest paid government employee?

Yeah dems don't believe in science so ...

[Offthemat]

12 minutes ago, ionel said:

Yeah dems don't believe in science so ...

That may be another result of those Ivy League educations. 

[headshuck]

[Bigbrog]

Seems like a good pick

[Lipdrag]

5 hours ago, headshuck said:

 

Trump’s racist sexism is running amok in his nominations.  It is exceeded only by his sexist racism.

[Le duke]

Trump’s racist sexism is running amok in his nominations.  It is exceeded only by his sexist racism.

For Trump, someone’s subservience to his will is the most valuable quality and outweighs all others. No one else is as willing to engage in the “lawfare” Republicans think is happening now (while Hunter Biden, Sen. Bob Menendez, etc. are awaiting sentencing) as Kashyap Patel.

Here’s a quote from ol’ Kashyap:



By “all-American patriots”, he means people who don’t give a *I poop my pants, don't laugh at me* about the rule of law and will do whatever he tells him.

Also: I’ll wager anyone here $1000 that Trump purges senior military leaders or uses the military against US civilians.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[mspart]

20 hours ago, Le duke said:

Also: I’ll wager anyone here $1000 that Trump purges senior military leaders or uses the military against US civilians.

I will not wager, but I think the former happens and the latter does not.  I will applaud this as I feel military readiness has suffered due to the woke policies enacted in the military.  

mspart

[Offthemat]

22 hours ago, Le duke said:

Also: I’ll wager anyone here $1000 that Trump purges senior military leaders or uses the military against US civilians.
 

Looking for a suckers bet?  The military needs purged.  There are as many General officers now as at the end of WWII when the military was more than four times as large.  You said US civilians - not US citizens - there is no doubt the National Guard, Armed Forces, and Reserves are likely to be involved in deportations.  Some may be housed on military installations.  Get over it. 

[mspart]

Tom Homan:

https://www.koat.com/article/border-czar-tom-homan-sanctuary-cities-deportation/63036106

A warning to sanctuary states was given by incoming "Border Czar" Tom Homan, citing a federal law that prohibits people from protecting illegal immigrants and saying, "This is a felony to knowingly harbor concealed illegal immigration authorities. Don't test us."

KOAT legal expert John Day said there's not much a state can do to resist a federal order, but if they do try to resist, he said there could be consequences. 

"There is a law that says if you knowingly conceal or harbor someone who's an unauthorized person, you theoretically can face federal prosecution or face fines," Day said. "What we haven't seen is if and how it applies to mayors, to governors, to people who are elected officials in states, and that's where I think the real battle may develop."

Tom Homan is not messing around. 

mspart

[Le duke]

Tom Homan:
https://www.koat.com/article/border-czar-tom-homan-sanctuary-cities-deportation/63036106
A warning to sanctuary states was given by incoming "Border Czar" Tom Homan, citing a federal law that prohibits people from protecting illegal immigrants and saying, "This is a felony to knowingly harbor concealed illegal immigration authorities. Don't test us."
KOAT legal expert John Day said there's not much a state can do to resist a federal order, but if they do try to resist, he said there could be consequences. 
"There is a law that says if you knowingly conceal or harbor someone who's an unauthorized person, you theoretically can face federal prosecution or face fines," Day said. "What we haven't seen is if and how it applies to mayors, to governors, to people who are elected officials in states, and that's where I think the real battle may develop."
Tom Homan is not messing around. 
mspart

Sure.

But…which federal law compels the states to do the federal government’s job?

I’ll wait.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[mspart]

I don't think it is a matter of the state's doing the Fed's job.   It is a matter of when the Feds ask the state to provide the names of all illegal aliens in their prisons and when they are getting out and the state advising them of these details so the feds can deport when the sentence runs out.   If they do not do this, they are harboring an illegal alien.

If they refuse to give whereabouts of individuals who are not incarcerated, that to would be a felony if they know the whereabouts.   

mspart

[Le duke]

I don't think it is a matter of the state's doing the Fed's job.   It is a matter of when the Feds ask the state to provide the names of all illegal aliens in their prisons and when they are getting out and the state advising them of these details so the feds can deport when the sentence runs out.   If they do not do this, they are harboring an illegal alien.
If they refuse to give whereabouts of individuals who are not incarcerated, that to would be a felony if they know the whereabouts.   
mspart

I’m pretty sure that first part already happens and will continue to happen.

Re: the second, I’m not sure that many states keep track of addresses of people that basically don’t exist on paper. The ones who are released pending immigration hearings would have their whereabouts known by the feds, not the state.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Bigbrog]

12 hours ago, Le duke said:

 

I’m pretty sure that first part already happens and will continue to happen.

Re: the second, I’m not sure that many states keep track of addresses of people that basically don’t exist on paper. The ones who are released pending immigration hearings would have their whereabouts known by the feds, not the state.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

But if the police or other state departments have had interactions with illegal's it may be documented...ie., an illegal get's pulled over for speeding and their current address is on file, the states would have information the feds would not.

[Le duke]

But if the police or other state departments have had interactions with illegal's it may be documented...ie., an illegal get's pulled over for speeding and their current address is on file, the states would have information the feds would not.

How would the local PD know their immigration status?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Le duke]

In other news, sounds like Pete Hegseth (who has the unit crest of a unit he never served in tattooed to his arm, got booted from two veterans charities (for sexual harassment of female employees, being drunk on the job and embezzling money meant for vet outreach), and doesn’t have a tab) is about to get replaced by…Desantis.

What a maroon.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Wrestleknownothing]

14 minutes ago, Le duke said:

In other news, sounds like Pete Hegseth (who has the unit crest of a unit he never served in tattooed to his arm, got booted from two veterans charities (for sexual harassment of female employees, being drunk on the job and embezzling money meant for vet outreach), and doesn’t have a tab) is about to get replaced by…Desantis.

What a maroon.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That can't be right. I was given assurances right here on this board, that this time Trump nailed his cabinet picks.

[ionel]

25 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

That can't be right. I was given assurances right here on this board, that this time Trump nailed his cabinet picks.

How do we know you aren't really getting your political intel from SwimSwam? 

[1032004]

I guess the DEA pick was too woke?

[mspart]

It's not like picks of any President elect have not had any issues.  

mspart

[Lipdrag]

23 hours ago, Le duke said:

How would the local PD know their immigration status?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ask.

[Le duke]

Ask.

And then what?

They legally have no business asking that question during a traffic stop or similar minor infraction. No one in their right mind would answer the question at all. First person wrongfully detained sues the department(s) into oblivion.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[RockLobster]

13 hours ago, mspart said:

It's not like picks of any President elect have not had any issues.  

mspart

[Readers - before we go any further, realize that nobody really uses the word 'woke' any more except alarmist dopes.]

What do you mean by "issues"?

Be specific. Let's get to the core of it. Make the conversation meaningful, productive, and make sense to everybody who is reading it here.

Was he "woke"?

 

[RockLobster]

 

On 11/27/2024 at 1:12 PM, mspart said:

Exactly what I've been saying the left and media was doing.

Wuh? The left and the media? The Republicans are now in charge.
That election is done and over. You think vilifying the left and the media is what is needed now? I don't think so.

On 11/27/2024 at 2:40 PM, ionel said:

Yeah dems don't believe in science so ...

Wuh? Democratic voters don't believe in science? Half the voting citizens in the US? I don't think so.

On 11/27/2024 at 2:54 PM, Offthemat said:

That may be another result of those Ivy League educations. 

Wuh? These are the people that run the biggest US corporations. They are dumb? I don't think so.

On 12/2/2024 at 3:24 PM, Offthemat said:

Looking for a suckers bet?  The military needs purged.

Wuh? "The military needs purged"?  I don't think so.

 

This board is open to the world. Literally, anyone can post. North Koreans, Chinese, Russians, Iranians.... any a-hole.

But, that doesn't mean that a-holes aren't noticed when they post.

This appears to be a whole lot of un-American posting right here - and it isn't by accident.

It takes so few people to infect large social media audiences, and each can easily infect many dozens of sites per day.

America's enemies have been using social media to divide Americans for much longer than this board has existed.

What is surprising is that Americans, for the most part, still refuse to accept the reality of what is happening.

(Perhaps it's because the bad guys keep trying to attack anyone that sounds the alarm?)

[Caveira]

8 hours ago, RockLobster said:

Readers - before we go any further, realize that nobody really uses the word 'woke' any more except alarmist dopes.]

Is Kamala an alarmist.   A dope.   Both.  Or neither?

btw I got this on YouTube so your allowed to click it