Jump to content

Trump creates new "department" whose goal is efficiency and cutting down government waste


Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 11/13/2024 at 8:00 PM, VakAttack said:

That's the point, there's literally no way to verify it.  It's just "trust Elon!", a man with an obvious, huge conflict of interest.

Expand  

I think you’re just afraid he’s gonna cut lefty lefty programs.   
 

someone finally wants to cut gov fat…. And there is an issue with it somehow.  

Posted
  On 11/13/2024 at 8:03 PM, Caveira said:

I think you’re just afraid he’s gonna cut lefty lefty programs.   
 

someone finally wants to cut gov fat…. And there is an issue with it somehow.  

Expand  

You ask questions, I directly answer them, you choose to believe something totally unrelated that I never said.  Again, the internet in a nutshell.

You are a voice of reason. - @Paul158

Posted
  On 11/13/2024 at 8:00 PM, VakAttack said:

That's the point, there's literally no way to verify it.  It's just "trust Elon!", a man with an obvious, huge conflict of interest.

Expand  

That doesn't answer the question.   Is cutting no fat better than cutting fat?

mspart

  • Poopy 1
Posted
  On 11/13/2024 at 8:12 PM, mspart said:

That doesn't answer the question.   Is cutting no fat better than cutting fat?

mspart

Expand  

Again, I'm being asked to just assume that whatever Elon, a man with no governmental experience, says is fat is fat, and directly, the answer is "not necessarily, if the other related effects are even worse."

That's the point most of you refuse to acknowledge, rarely is the answer with something as complicated as government a black and white thing with a silver bullet answer.

You are a voice of reason. - @Paul158

Posted
  On 11/13/2024 at 8:15 PM, VakAttack said:

Again, I'm being asked to just assume that whatever Elon, a man with no governmental experience, says is fat is fat, and directly, the answer is "not necessarily, if the other related effects are even worse."

That's the point most of you refuse to acknowledge, rarely is the answer with something as complicated as government a black and white thing with a silver bullet answer.

Expand  

So doing nothing is preferable to doing something?  I think your issue is with Trump and who he chooses, not with the effort itself.   But if it is with the effort itself, it wouldn't matter who is doing this as far as you are concerned. 

mspart

 

  • Bob 1
  • Poopy 1
Posted
  On 11/13/2024 at 8:17 PM, mspart said:

So doing nothing is preferable to doing something?  I think your issue is with Trump and who he chooses, not with the effort itself.   But if it is with the effort itself, it wouldn't matter who is doing this as far as you are concerned. 

mspart

 

Expand  

I have already said, multiple times, the issue is with who he's tapping and the method of execution.  There is already an office whose role it is to do these things, he could add muscle and teeth to their operation, but instead he has to do the big, showy, and inherently inefficient thing of creating a whole new office.

  • Bob 1

You are a voice of reason. - @Paul158

Posted
  On 11/13/2024 at 8:15 PM, VakAttack said:

Again, I'm being asked to just assume that whatever Elon, a man with no governmental experience, says is fat is fat, 

Expand  

Well for a 100+ years we've been asked to just assume that whatever some bureaucrat with no real world or business experience says they need for funding is true, realizing all they know is more tax payer dollars is better.

How refreshing it should be to have someone who understands efficiency and can easily recognize where the fat is.  

  • Bob 1

.

Posted

if you're losing your ***ducking** mind over an attempt to identify and curtail massive amounts of taxpayer money that gets wasted by bureaucracy you've been indoctrinated. 

frankly it's one of the more important things that need to be done in DC and frankly, i won't take anyone who says differently as a serious person going forward.

you're a joke and a clown and in denial b/c you're married to your party.

  • Bob 2

TBD

Posted
  On 11/13/2024 at 6:30 PM, Tripnsweep said:

Yeah I'm sure his dad didn't help them at all. 🙄 Or if he had not succeeded he couldn't have gone home and lived relatively well. You probably believe that Trump built himself up with just a million dollar loan from his dad too. 

Expand  

Nope and these people's situations are not close to the same.  

Posted
  On 11/13/2024 at 8:25 PM, Husker_Du said:

if you're losing your ***ducking** mind over an attempt to identify and curtail massive amounts of taxpayer money that gets wasted by bureaucracy you've been indoctrinated. 

frankly it's one of the more important things that need to be done in DC and frankly, i won't take anyone who says differently as a serious person going forward.

you're a joke and a clown and in denial b/c you're married to your party.

Expand  

Sounds like somebody will be using the genetic fallacy going forward.  Love you, boo bear.

You are a voice of reason. - @Paul158

Posted

What a self-damning statement from the GAO.

  Quote

GAO’s report recommendations have the potential to save taxpayers billions of dollars and greatly improve government operations. About 60% of all new reports make recommendations, and we have found that about 75% of our past recommendations are implemented over a four year period.

Expand  

---------

Yet nobody on the streets know you exist and anybody can identify waste in the Government.

Posted
  On 11/13/2024 at 8:11 PM, VakAttack said:

You ask questions, I directly answer them, you choose to believe something totally unrelated that I never said.  Again, the internet in a nutshell.

Expand  

I asked you to propose someone.  You’re asking for a utopia that doesn’t exist imo.      

Posted
  On 11/13/2024 at 8:25 PM, Husker_Du said:

if you're losing your ***ducking** mind over an attempt to identify and curtail massive amounts of taxpayer money that gets wasted by bureaucracy you've been indoctrinated. 

frankly it's one of the more important things that need to be done in DC and frankly, i won't take anyone who says differently as a serious person going forward.

you're a joke and a clown and in denial b/c you're married to your party.

Expand  

But is the single most conflicted person the right one to do it?

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
  On 11/13/2024 at 8:34 PM, Caveira said:

I asked you to propose someone.  You’re asking for a utopia that doesn’t exist imo.      

Expand  

Utopia is "don't put a person with huge, billion dollar conflicts of interest in charge of an area that he directly benefits from."  Staggering stuff.

You are a voice of reason. - @Paul158

Posted (edited)
  On 11/13/2024 at 8:38 PM, VakAttack said:

Utopia is "don't put a person with huge, billion dollar conflicts of interest in charge of an area that he directly benefits from."  Staggering stuff.

Expand  

Name someone who you would like to do this ?  Who would be qualified for this role in your opinion?

Edited by Caveira
Posted
  On 11/13/2024 at 8:19 PM, VakAttack said:

I have already said, multiple times, the issue is with who he's tapping and the method of execution.  There is already an office whose role it is to do these things, he could add muscle and teeth to their operation, but instead he has to do the big, showy, and inherently inefficient thing of creating a whole new office.

Expand  

The office that is already in place does not seem to be doing a very good job. Matter of fact they are doing a piss poor job. Trying to cut back on government programs is going to be met with a great deal of resistance. It might take an Army to pull their funds from their cold dead hands.

  • Bob 1
Posted
  On 11/13/2024 at 8:45 PM, VakAttack said:

Would like to, or do I think is reasonable in the context of Trump is president?  I'll take the second one.  How about Mitch Daniels or Mara MacGuineas?

Expand  

Haven’t they already failed at this?   Pre existing gov budget people.   Hmmmmmm

  • Bob 2
Posted
  On 11/13/2024 at 8:48 PM, Caveira said:

Haven’t they already failed at this?   Pre existing gov budget people.   Hmmmmmm

Expand  

I would say yes. It is estimated that there is over ! trillion dollars of Waste and fraud in the federal government right now. I'm not sure if that includes the billions of dollars of redundancy in many of the programs. I believe there is quite a bit of federal overlap with State and local programs also. A little reform wouldn't hurt.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...