Jump to content

Which weight has had the most unique winners since 1998?  

25 members have voted

  1. 1. Which weight has had the most unique winners since 1998?

    • 118/125
      3
    • 126/133
      1
    • 134/141
      3
    • 142/149
      2
    • 150/157
      3
    • 158/165
      2
    • 167/174
      2
    • 177/184
      2
    • 190/197
      4
    • 275/285
      3


Recommended Posts

Posted

I said 190/197.

I think we have had more unique/separate multi-time champs at the other weights.

  • Bob 1
  • Brain 1

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Posted
  On 9/23/2024 at 9:29 PM, nhs67 said:

I said 190/197.

I think we have had more unique/separate multi-time champs at the other weights.

Expand  

Good chance.  If Yianni and Zain didn't man 149 for a few years that would've been my pick.  I think Metcalf was the only mutli time champ at that weight prior to them

I Don't Agree With What I Posted

Posted (edited)
  On 9/23/2024 at 9:51 PM, Gus said:

I am rolling with 165 but I do not feel confident about the pick. 

Expand  

Oof - Just off the top of my head I can list these multi time champs at 165- Taylor, Cenzo, KOT, Dierenger, Hendricks, Perry, Imar...Who am I missisng?

Edited by PortaJohn

I Don't Agree With What I Posted

Posted
  On 9/23/2024 at 9:56 PM, PortaJohn said:

Oof - Just off the top of my head I can list these multi time champs at 165- Taylor, Cenzo, KOT, Dierenger, Hendricks, Perry, Imar...Who am I missisng?

Expand  

Imar's were both at 157. Taylor had 1 at 157, 1 at 165. You can come up with a similar list at most every weight I am sure. When WKN post's the results I think it will be pretty similar across the board. 

Posted
  On 9/23/2024 at 10:04 PM, Gus said:

Imar's were both at 157. Taylor had 1 at 157, 1 at 165. You can come up with a similar list at most every weight I am sure. When WKN post's the results I think it will be pretty similar across the board. 

Expand  

You're correct about Imar but Taylor won both his titles at 165

  • Bob 1

I Don't Agree With What I Posted

Posted
  On 9/23/2024 at 10:11 PM, Gus said:

I stand corrected.

Expand  

Pritzlaff was the other multi time champ.  Thats 7 champs (14 titles) compared to 125 5 champs (12 titles).   I definitely missed the mark on 125.  I should've gone with my first hunch 149.  I think it's only (7 titles).

I Don't Agree With What I Posted

Posted

Not what I was expecting when saw portajohn parity.  Yes I did open thread even though expecting something disgusting.  💩 

  • Bob 1
  • Poopy 1

.

Posted (edited)

Why start at 1998?  Wasn’t that the last year of the old weights?  Makes me think it might be someone who also won in 1997 but not 1999 :-).  Which only one would be 141.  (I voted 126/133 but thinking that’s probably wrong).

Edited by 1032004
Posted
  On 9/24/2024 at 3:03 AM, 1032004 said:

Why start at 1998?  Wasn’t that the last year of the old weights?  Makes me think it might be someone who also won in 1997 but not 1999 :-).  Which only one would be 141.  (I voted 126/133 but thinking that’s probably wrong).

Expand  

@PortaJohn suggested 1998 to present, and I am a doer not a thinker.

  • Brain 1

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
  On 9/24/2024 at 3:03 AM, 1032004 said:

Why start at 1998?  Wasn’t that the last year of the old weights?  Makes me think it might be someone who also won in 1997 but not 1999 :-).  Which only one would be 141.  (I voted 126/133 but thinking that’s probably wrong).

Expand  

Did a bad job of requesting the data.  Wanted the data starting from the 1998-1999 season

I Don't Agree With What I Posted

Posted
  On 9/24/2024 at 12:12 PM, PortaJohn said:

Did a bad job of requesting the data.  Wanted the data starting from the 1998-1999 season

Expand  

The good news is that it makes no difference.

Both 142/149 and 150/157 had 22 unique winners in the 26 season span from 1998 to 2024. That put them 2 up on 190/197. Shorten it by a season and it is a one unique champ lead, but still a lead.

image.thumb.png.c26f0675c3ad44f31a20c71d2972d53e.png

 

You proposed unique champs as the definition of parity (and that is what I polled on), but you can also look at it more broadly through the lens of unique AAs. Viewed this way, 140/149 slides to second behind 167/174 while 150/157 plummets to seventh.

image.thumb.png.78205231795e2027a9016e6ab8a2ffe0.png

But no matter how you look at it the weight extremes are also the dominance extremes. The heavies have the least amount of parity and the lights are not far behind regardless of whether you are counting unique champs or unique AAs. This, too, is unaffected by the choice of 1998 over 1999 as the start year.

  • Bob 3

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted

177/184 being the least isn't a surprise. Off the top of my head we have Dean (2), EZ Ed (2), Nickal (2), Cael (3) and AB (3) who all won multiple titles in that time. 

  On 9/24/2024 at 12:51 PM, Wrestleknownothing said:

And for fun, here is the list of multi-time winners at each weight in the time period

image.thumb.png.54395ffa87dfcfbbb4d69375268d1ae7.png

Expand  

Maybe I'm not getting what you're trying to show here but 177/184, for example, is way off. Cael (3), Ed Ruth (2), Nickal (2), Brooks (3) should all be in that group, no?

Posted
  On 9/23/2024 at 10:18 PM, PortaJohn said:

Pritzlaff was the other multi time champ.  Thats 7 champs (14 titles) compared to 125 5 champs (12 titles).   I definitely missed the mark on 125.  I should've gone with my first hunch 149.  I think it's only (7 titles).

Expand  

Looks like 125 and 165 were equally bad choices!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...