Idaho Posted September 11 Posted September 11 16 hours ago, nhs67 said: Iowa State is already down to weight... 125 Terukina, Diversent, Grice 133 E. Frost 141 J. Frost, Redding 149 Echemendia, Swiderski 157 Johnson, Chittum 165 Gaitan (down from 174), Rojas 174 Riggins 184 Bockman 197 Carroll 285 Bastida That's a solid lineup... still having a hard time envisioning Brockman down at 184...that's going to be a nightmare cut. Sponsored by INTERMAT
poorwrestler Posted September 11 Posted September 11 There is a lot of intriguing matchups with Minnesota vs SDSU this year with all the transfers for both teams. Flynn vs Jordan Askey vs Siebrecht Sparks vs Rhodes Whiting vs DeVos McEnelly vs Berge Salazar vs GlazierWells vs Cardinal rubber match too Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Le duke Posted September 11 Posted September 11 I want Minnesota to be good again. They've had some rough years recently but they should put up a good fight against some of the top teams this season.
nhs67 Posted September 11 Posted September 11 20 minutes ago, Idaho said: That's a solid lineup... still having a hard time envisioning Brockman down at 184...that's going to be a nightmare cut. What's wild is that he has already made it below 184.0lbs. "I know actually nothing. It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me
CowboyYe2024 Posted September 11 Posted September 11 2 minutes ago, Le duke said: I want Minnesota to be good again. They've had some rough years recently but they should put up a good fight against some of the top teams this season. they need to dual Okie State again. Those are always fun
Idaho Posted September 11 Posted September 11 9 minutes ago, nhs67 said: What's wild is that he has already made it below 184.0lbs. Are you looking at the Trackwrestling? I dont' think the Red X means they are under that weight. Sponsored by INTERMAT
nhs67 Posted September 11 Posted September 11 2 minutes ago, Idaho said: Are you looking at the Trackwrestling? I dont' think the Red X means they are under that weight. The Red X means they failed something else (hydration probably), they made that weight, though. The weight listed is what they weighed at (so if he was 184, it means 174.1-184.0). We use trackwrestling for our alphas as well and that is how it has been explained to us. That is HS - vs NCAA, though. There could be a difference. "I know actually nothing. It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me
H82Lose Posted September 11 Posted September 11 1 hour ago, nhs67 said: Listen man, we are both wrestling fans. Nobody is wrong there and you are definitively more 'in the know' on ISU . My stance was more on morality conflicts where both Frost brothers had dreams of wrestling together. well you were spot on, lol. I called my guy and said, this jackass is claiming 141 Frost, and he said, yeah, i would eat crow, it looks like it could go that way! LOL...so, I like mine medium, with salt and pepper.
Gus Posted September 11 Posted September 11 1 hour ago, MNRodent said: There is a lot of intriguing matchups with Minnesota vs SDSU this year with all the transfers for both teams. Flynn vs Jordan Askey vs Siebrecht Sparks vs Rhodes Whiting vs DeVos McEnelly vs Berge Salazar vs Glazier The dual will be in Brookings Dec 1. I plan to be there and it should be a close dual. Wrestlestat has it 19-12 for the bad guys. 1
Idaho Posted September 11 Posted September 11 17 minutes ago, nhs67 said: The Red X means they failed something else (hydration probably), they made that weight, though. The weight listed is what they weighed at (so if he was 184, it means 174.1-184.0). We use trackwrestling for our alphas as well and that is how it has been explained to us. That is HS - vs NCAA, though. There could be a difference. My understanding was that the assessor can deny the assessment (red x) for several reasons. If there is missing information, such as a body fat test, current weigh in, etc. then you would deny the assessment because it's incomplete information. .You will notice that every wrestler that has a red X has their projected weight class listed. I doubt that every one of those guys is on weight the second week of school. Sponsored by INTERMAT
nhs67 Posted September 11 Posted September 11 25 minutes ago, Idaho said: My understanding was that the assessor can deny the assessment (red x) for several reasons. If there is missing information, such as a body fat test, current weigh in, etc. then you would deny the assessment because it's incomplete information. .You will notice that every wrestler that has a red X has their projected weight class listed. I doubt that every one of those guys is on weight the second week of school. What you said is true however, the weight is a variable, meaning that it is just a number reported. They put a number in and then it fills the number (weight class) automatically. If they weighed in, it will show what weight class they weighed at for it. The ones you look at that have the Red X and no weight means a weight wasn't reported. The downside to having weight entered in, if you fail, is that you are now on the clock for descent and your coaches will be held accountable if you lose weight too rapidly. Some schools will do the weight part of the certification after the hydration, skinfold, etc that way they can know if they can get to the weight class that they need/want prior to weighing in. They aren't supposed to do it that way, but a lot of folks do. "I know actually nothing. It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me
Idaho Posted September 11 Posted September 11 2 hours ago, nhs67 said: What you said is true however, the weight is a variable, meaning that it is just a number reported. They put a number in and then it fills the number (weight class) automatically. If they weighed in, it will show what weight class they weighed at for it. The ones you look at that have the Red X and no weight means a weight wasn't reported. The downside to having weight entered in, if you fail, is that you are now on the clock for descent and your coaches will be held accountable if you lose weight too rapidly. Some schools will do the weight part of the certification after the hydration, skinfold, etc that way they can know if they can get to the weight class that they need/want prior to weighing in. They aren't supposed to do it that way, but a lot of folks do. WIth some big early duals only 7 weeks away, I am 99.9% sure that they will not approve the assessment and have a weight decent plan roll out until all the numbers are met to make that date. 1 Sponsored by INTERMAT
Winners Circle Posted September 12 Posted September 12 On 9/10/2024 at 4:36 PM, nhs67 said: NC State and Arizona State are both CHUBBY. Can confirm.
Winners Circle Posted September 12 Posted September 12 On 9/10/2024 at 4:42 PM, nhs67 said: OSU looks to be 125 - Spratley 133 - Hughes, Whitcraft 141 - Jamison 149 - Young 157 - Fish, Teague 165 - Amine 174 - Hamiti 184 - Plott, Robb 197 - Merrill, Surber 285 - Pindrickson I'd flop Jamison and Young. But I think you got the rest.
nhs67 Posted September 12 Posted September 12 4 minutes ago, Winners Circle said: I'd flop Jamison and Young. But I think you got the rest. Jamison is under 141 already and Young was at 149. 1 "I know actually nothing. It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me
peanut Posted September 15 Posted September 15 On 9/10/2024 at 6:31 PM, CowboyYe2024 said: Pyles said Haines will redshirt I'm sure Pyles has much better info than me. But I note that Haines just beat KOT 6-0 at WTTs today. So it seems like he's ready to roll now. And with all the talent in the room, I don't see any reason for Haines to sit (unless he wants to). As of now I'd predict the PSU lineup as: 125- Lilledahl 133- Davis (possible: Nagao) 141- BB 149- SVN 157- Kasak 165- MM 174- Haines 184- Cstar 197- Barr HWT- Kerk 1
MPhillips Posted September 15 Posted September 15 11 minutes ago, peanut said: I don't see any reason for Haines to sit He's, red shirting... .
peanut Posted September 15 Posted September 15 56 minutes ago, MPhillips said: He's, red shirting... How is that known as a certainty?
flyingcement Posted September 15 Posted September 15 22 minutes ago, Greenwave said: What is projected line up for Little Rock?? projected lineup is below with wrestlestat rating in parentheses 125: Jeremiah Reno (36) 133: Nassir Bailey (3) 141: Jaivon Jones (26) or Cael Keck (109) 149: Jordan Williams (12) 157: Matt Bianchi (34) 165: Joey Bianchi (17) 174: Triston Wills (40) 184: Brock Delsignore (23) 197: Stephen Little (5) 285: Josiah Hill (24) 1
MPhillips Posted September 15 Posted September 15 3 hours ago, peanut said: How is that known as a certainty? It isn't... .
ionel Posted September 15 Posted September 15 12 minutes ago, MPhillips said: It isn't... ... so @MPdoesn'tknow? .
MPhillips Posted September 15 Posted September 15 29 minutes ago, ionel said: ... so @MPdoesn'tknow? I do... .
nhs67 Posted September 16 Posted September 16 20 hours ago, peanut said: I'm sure Pyles has much better info than me. But I note that Haines just beat KOT 6-0 at WTTs today. So it seems like he's ready to roll now. And with all the talent in the room, I don't see any reason for Haines to sit (unless he wants to). As of now I'd predict the PSU lineup as: 125- Lilledahl 133- Davis (possible: Nagao) 141- BB 149- SVN 157- Kasak 165- MM 174- Haines 184- Cstar 197- Barr HWT- Kerk Apparently Facundo to 157 is getting some action. "I know actually nothing. It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me
nhs67 Posted September 16 Posted September 16 4 minutes ago, nhs67 said: Apparently Facundo to 157 is getting some action. To add to this, Facundo weighed between 157.1 - 165.0 for his Alpha. Mesenbrink weighed 165.1 - 174.0. Ryder weighed 174.1 - 184.0. The writing on the wall is that Facundo is not going 174lbs this season. 1 "I know actually nothing. It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me
Eren Sement Council Rock North, Pennsylvania Class of 2025 Committed to Michigan Projected Weight: 141
Kingston Daniells Silva Greens Farms Academy, Connecticut Class of 2025 Committed to Columbia Projected Weight: 197
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now