lu_alum Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 How can the #1 team in the country host a dual in the BJC and not have video replay available? 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macwoodfleet Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 It wasn't a takedown, so no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JuanMogen Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 I hope he asteriskseses his way to a national title. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pinnacle Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 2 minutes ago, JuanMogen said: I hope he asteriskseses his way to a national title. I can see that headline now ... 14 Year Old Wins National Title For Dear Old State Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1032004 Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 I didn’t think that one was a TD. Did they not review it at all though? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lu_alum Posted February 13 Author Share Posted February 13 3 minutes ago, 1032004 said: I didn’t think that one was a TD. Did they not review it at all though? Rutgers threw a brick, but the ref indicated there was no video available for the dual. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1032004 Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 (edited) 1 hour ago, lu_alum said: Rutgers threw a brick, but the ref indicated there was no video available for the dual. Just finished watching and Sparks did acknowledge no replay available later on. Imagine if that happened in Iowa Edited February 13 by 1032004 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MPhillips Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 17 minutes ago, 1032004 said: Just finished watching and Sparks did acknowledge no replay available later on. Imagine if that happened in Iowa The referee acknowledged it as soon as Rutgers threw the brick in the 125 match. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyCinnabon Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 I watched the dual live, it wasn't a TD. Close but you know, hand grenades and stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interviewed_at_Weehawken Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 Why even give coaches bricks if there is no video review? 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MPhillips Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 2 minutes ago, Interviewed_at_Weehawken said: Why even give coaches bricks if there is no video review? Indeed... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Idaho Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 7 hours ago, lu_alum said: How can the #1 team in the country host a dual in the BJC and not have video replay available? Legit question regardless of whether it was a TD or not. Does the NCAA and B10 require that you have video replay available? Sponsored by INTERMAT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1032004 Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 1 minute ago, Idaho said: Legit question regardless of whether it was a TD or not. Does the NCAA and B10 require that you have video replay available? they should be forced to donate $1MM to Rutgers or something 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Idaho Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 Just now, 1032004 said: they should be forced to donate $1MM to Rutgers or something Agree... it was an NCAA violation that caused pain and suffering. I hear the NLWC has like 6 million. Sponsored by INTERMAT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ionel Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 26 minutes ago, Idaho said: Legit question regardless of whether it was a TD or not. Does the NCAA and B10 require that you have video replay available? Shouldn't matter since Davis was pinned and you can't challenge pins ... oh wait they failed to call the pin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrestleknownothing Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 45 minutes ago, Interviewed_at_Weehawken said: Why even give coaches bricks if there is no video review? I thought the same thing last night. But this morning I read on HVI that they finally got the video review system running at the end of the 133 match. That poster claimed that by then, by rule it could not be used since it was not available for all the matches. Sounds like they had bricks because they planned to have video review, but the best laid plans of mice and men... Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gimpeltf Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 40 minutes ago, Idaho said: Legit question regardless of whether it was a TD or not. Does the NCAA and B10 require that you have video replay available? Yes and no to NCAA requirement. It's not required to have video available. However, it is required to inform all institutions involved (in this case just one other one) about how they're doing it. Either they didn't inform Rutgers about it, Rutgers forgot, or the third possibility- it was unexpectedly non-functional at that point. Given that they provided bricks I think the third (and I see WKN says he read elsewhere the same thought) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILLINIWrestlingBlog Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 1 hour ago, Interviewed_at_Weehawken said: Why even give coaches bricks if there is no video review? They are rhetorical challenge bricks. You never get an answer, only the satisfaction from asking the question. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ionel Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 1 hour ago, Interviewed_at_Weehawken said: Why even give coaches bricks if there is no video review? So they don't throw a chair? 6 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Truzzcat Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 while I would love an excuse to say he should have another loss, watching it back it was definitely only 2 seconds so no danger TD. He may have been stuck but thats not reviewable and also probably rarely if ever going to get called in a position like that so quickly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antitroll2828 Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 (edited) It’s a big ten requirement to have review and Penn state obviously has a review system but the system went down while they were testing it shortly before the match and didn’t get it up and running til 141 at which point you aren’t allowed to use it bc it wasn’t available for all the matches Edited February 13 by Antitroll2828 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gimpeltf Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 8 minutes ago, Antitroll2828 said: It’s a big ten requirement to have review and Penn state obviously has a review system but the system went down while they were testing it shortly before the match and didn’t get it up and running til 141 at which point you aren’t allowed to use it bc it wasn’t available for all the matches The requirement isn't quite for all matches since if it went down during other than the first match what about the ones before? The rule is that if they can't fix it during that match where it was requested then it is suspended for the remainder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KennyEBHS Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 Honestly, the match flowed so much better without review. Calls rarely change anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul158 Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 50 minutes ago, ionel said: So they don't throw a chair? Or a shoe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul158 Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 6 minutes ago, KennyEBHS said: Honestly, the match flowed so much better without review. Calls rarely change anyway. Without a 3rd party review its rare that the call is changed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eli Leonard Mt. Horeb/Barneveld, Wisconsin Class of 2026 Committed to Wisconsin Projected Weight: 174
Hunter Stevens Iowa-Grant/Highland, Wisconsin Class of 2026 Committed to Wisconsin Projected Weight: 141, 149
Griffin LaPlante St. Francis, New York Class of 2026 Committed to North Carolina State Projected Weight: 174
Dom Deputy Chestnut Ridge, Pennsylvania Class of 2026 Committed to North Carolina State Projected Weight: 125
Brandon Carr Sun Valley, Pennsylvania Class of 2025 Committed to Franklin & Marshall Projected Weight: 184, 197
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now