Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, headshuck said:

As compared to? 1980?

Inflation, fed funds rate, unemployment are all in line with 2000 - 2007. 

When compared to 1980 inflation is one-third what it was, fed funds rate is 30% of what it was, unemployment is half of what it was. 

  • Fire 1

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
50 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

How about the size of the workforce employed by the government?

Would prefer to talk about the size of the workforce as a whole instead of cherry picking things, but I guess that does fall within my original question after all....

Posted
51 minutes ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

What point are you making?

Shrinkflation.  Less product for the same or higher prices.

  • Fire 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, jross said:

Shrinkflation.  Less product for the same or higher prices.

Is that a reflection of the strength of the economy, or of corporate strategy and consumer ignorance?

Posted
16 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

Is that a reflection of the strength of the economy, or of corporate strategy and consumer ignorance?

Its inflation. 

  • Fire 1
  • Confused 1

2BPE 11/17/24 SMC

Posted
29 minutes ago, jross said:

Shrinkflation.  Less product for the same or higher prices.

You didn't mention the price of the thing. That would've helped. But that's how inflation works over time. To keep something the same price as purchase power decreases. You need to; alter production, change or source alternative materials, or just offer it at a smaller size. I'm sure that's not an exhaustive list but those come to mind. 

  • Fire 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

Is that a reflection of the strength of the economy, or of corporate strategy and consumer ignorance?

Inflation causes things to cost more to make.   So to keep the prices the same, you get to purchase less of a product for the same money.    Or you get to pay more for the same amount of product.   Inflation 101. 

mspart

  • Fire 2
Posted
Just now, mspart said:

Inflation causes things to cost more to make.   So to keep the prices the same, you get to purchase less of a product for the same money.    Or you get to pay more for the same amount of product.   Inflation 101. 

mspart

I understand that. And with that in mind, according to the picture (if inflation is in fact the sole cause for the picture), then it must hold true that inflation has been on a steady, constant rise for the last 40 years? And that picture is not actually a reflection of the strength of the current economy, but just par for the course…

Posted

Excellent question.

Higher wages could indicate a strong economy... but increased unpaid credit card debt indicates a lousy economy.

At the end of 2021, 39% of credit card holders carried debt from month to month.  That jumped to 47% in 2023 per Bankrate.  According to TransUnion, the number of Americans missing payments increased, and the average credit card balance is the highest in a decade at $6,000.

The price of used pinball machines is dropping because there is less demand for the high-cost supply.  The product is not moving...

I heard the IKEA CEO talk about reducing prices to stimulate consumption and help with profit. 

  • Fire 2
  • Stalling 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Offthemat said:

How about the size of the workforce employed by the government?

Exactly. I heard the federal government is close to 25 percent of the new jobs. That is just ridiculous. But I guess that is on way to lower the unemployment rate.

  • Fire 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
57 minutes ago, jross said:

Shrinkflation.  Less product for the same or higher prices.

Yes, if you look at products you by in the store you would find you are getting less product for a higher.  price. 

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

Found it . 2023 there were 2.552 million government jobs added which was  25 percent of all jobs.. It states it is what helped our economy from falling apart last year and kept unemployment low. 

Edited by Paul158
missed a word
  • Fire 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, WrestlingRasta said:

Is that a reflection of the strength of the economy, or of corporate strategy and consumer ignorance?

It’s both. One is caused by the other 

  • Haha 1
Posted
6 hours ago, jross said:

Shrinkflation.  Less product for the same or higher prices.

But it isn't meaningful in the absolute. Median incomes have also risen since the 1980's. US Median income in 2020 is 3.2x what it was in 1980. 

  • Fire 1

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted

Also a direct result of more money in the supply.   That devalues the currency and people must make more to keep up.   They can make more because there is more of it out there.   But they are not earning more.   In 1930's bread cost 10 cents a loaf.   If you could barely afford bread, that would be roughly 10 cents a day so $26/year in bread costs.   Compare to now.   Bread costs $2/loaf.   So that is $2 a day which is $522/year.    Is the person making $522/year in 2024 richer than the guy making $26/year in 1930's?    No, the purchasing power is the same.   Inflation robs the currency of the value it had.   That is a direct result of government monetary policy.   Period. 

From https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/APU0000702111   Bread prices from 1980 to now. 

image.thumb.png.6cd91455ebbebe6a1167fba3b9278f32.png

mspart

Posted
2 hours ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

But it isn't meaningful in the absolute. Median incomes have also risen since the 1980's. US Median income in 2020 is 3.2x what it was in 1980. 

Stop and think.  We’ve gone from single income families of the 1960s to two+ income families in order to maintain the status quo.  In the name of progress. 

  • Confused 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...