Climate Hoax

[Scouts Honor]

fed govt or not..

it was the authoritarian leftists

 

[mspart]

2 hours ago, red viking said:

Numerous statements there are outright lies or based on false premises. Basically, all of them. At the time, COVID was a major concern and we couldn't tell for sure how bad it would be but many people were dying. And wearing masks does slow down the viruses; nobody claimed it stops it 100%, so you have straw men in there on top of all your other crap. #1 is also a 110% strawman. Nobody said otherwise. 

Which are lies?

mspart

[Lipdrag]

Former Obama administration climateer hoaxamaniac calling out his fellow "scientists" (a.k.a. liars).  The clip is a bit long with pre and post commentary by the lady.  The biggest problem isn't the liars.   It is that other observations, projections,  models, and interpretations of the data was not heard.  Actually free speech and exchange of ideas was suppressed.

 

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/17QyDEhYXJ/

[red viking]

47 minutes ago, Lipdrag said:

Former Obama administration climateer hoaxamaniac calling out his fellow "scientists" (a.k.a. liars).  The clip is a bit long with pre and post commentary by the lady.  The biggest problem isn't the liars.   It is that other observations, projections,  models, and interpretations of the data was not heard.  Actually free speech and exchange of ideas was suppressed.

 

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/17QyDEhYXJ/

What a joke of a post. DUMB and also not substantive. First, he isn't a clinatologist. Second, hes saying absolutely nothing that any real scientist doesn't already know. There are hundreds of different climate models. Some overestimate and some underestimate. Thats why we have do many of them. 

Doesn't change fact that earth is warming, and warming VERY fast, and yes, its 110% anthropogenic. 

[Interviewed_at_Weehawken]

1 hour ago, red viking said:

What a joke of a post. DUMB and also not substantive. First, he isn't a clinatologist. Second, hes saying absolutely nothing that any real scientist doesn't already know. There are hundreds of different climate models. Some overestimate and some underestimate. Thats why we have do many of them. 

Doesn't change fact that earth is warming, and warming VERY fast, and yes, its 110% anthropogenic. 

Incorrect.

[Lipdrag]

10 minutes ago, Interviewed_at_Weehawken said:

Incorrect.

110%.

[Lipdrag]

Former climateer hoaxananiac now posts about getting red pilled and finally understanding physics, economics, efc.  The last line is great:  isn't 2026 the year of not being an idiot?

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/19EVpM3gaU/

[red viking]

24 minutes ago, Lipdrag said:

Former climateer hoaxananiac now posts about getting red pilled and finally understanding physics, economics, efc.  The last line is great:  isn't 2026 the year of not being an idiot?

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/19EVpM3gaU/

I watched the first few seconds and all hes saying is that net zero would destroy the economy. 

Im fine with that argument but its 110% different from whether man is causing global global warming. 

Edited July 6 by red viking

[Caveira]

5 minutes ago, red viking said:

I watched the fi

I read the first few letters of what you wrote.  You’re probably 120% wrong. 

[Lipdrag]

Dutch Climateer Hoaxamaniacs erasing history.  The chutzpah is incredible.  But the Hoax must be served.

 

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1959476194768568

[Simpleman424]

Ya’ll worried about the earth getting a little warmer when we have people that could literally walk off the edge?!

[Scouts Honor]

 

[ionel]

3 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

 

So you are thinking not biodegradable?  

[Offthemat]

Can you burn them in the fireplace?

[ionel]

59 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

Can you burn them in the fireplace?

First soak with diesel fuel then burn with coal.  

[red viking]

On 7/26/2026 at 9:36 AM, Lipdrag said:

Dutch Climateer Hoaxamaniacs erasing history.  The chutzpah is incredible.  But the Hoax must be served.

 

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1959476194768568

Anonymous data is thrown out in all fields. Happens in u.s. too and the reasons are well documented and explained at NOAAs website and other places. None of this changes the fact that earth is clearly warming and its anthropogenic. Theres zero doubt about it. 

[Caveira]

16 minutes ago, red viking said:

Anonymous data is thrown out in all fields. Happens in u.s. too and the reasons are well documented and explained at NOAAs website and other places. None of this changes the fact that earth is clearly warming and its anthropogenic. Theres zero doubt about it. 

By your own rules you are not capable of commenting on this subject as your not a real scientist and don’t have a PhD in climatology.  Stick to terrorism and anti Americanism 

Edited August 9 by Caveira

[JimmySpeaks]

28 minutes ago, Caveira said:

By your own rules you are not capable of commenting on this subject as your not a real scientist and don’t have a PhD in climatology.  Stick to terrorism and anti Americanism 

His rules don’t apply to him. Just anyone he doesn’t agree with. 

[Offthemat]

51 minutes ago, ionel said:

First soak with diesel fuel then burn with coal.  

[red viking]

56 minutes ago, red viking said:

Anonymous data is thrown out in all fields. Happens in u.s. too and the reasons are well documented and explained at NOAAs website and other places. None of this changes the fact that earth is clearly warming and its anthropogenic. Theres zero doubt about it. 

I'm not the one publishing the trends and conclusions but a little science background helps me understand it. Instead of listening to winger anti science conspiracy bs like u idiots  

[ionel]

6 minutes ago, red viking said:

I'm not the one publishing the trends and conclusions but a little science background helps me understand it. Instead of listening to winger anti science conspiracy bs like u idiots  

Don't listen to anonymous sources or data particularly if the source does not have a PhD.  

[red viking]

19 minutes ago, ionel said:

Don't listen to anonymous sources or data particularly if the source does not have a PhD.  

Bad data happens sometimes in science so there has to be some discernment about when you sometimes have to throw it out. 

For weather, its not complicated. If you have several weather stations in a small area and they all have generally the same temps but one is 20 degrees off from the others, you gotta figure its likely an error. 

Theres a crapload of temp data out there. 

[ionel]

13 minutes ago, red viking said:

Bad data happens sometimes in science so there has to be some discernment about when you sometimes have to throw it out. 

For weather, its not complicated. If you have several weather stations in a small area and they all have generally the same temps but one is 20 degrees off from the others, you gotta figure its likely an error. 

Theres a crapload of temp data out there. 

Sorry ... I can't hear you. 

[JimmySpeaks]

Planted food plots the last couple days. I could see my breath this morning. In August.  

[Offthemat]

2 hours ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Planted food plots the last couple days. I could see my breath this morning. In August.  

Winter and July.