All Activity

You’ve done that more than once on here. You can’t even show the math you claim is true.

Yikes

In 1989 after Johnson vs Texas struck down the Texas State law against flag burning Congress passed a federal law against it. When that law went into effect in 1990 protestors burned flags on the steps of the US Capitol. This same law you reference was on the books at the time and would have been applicable at that location. Those defendants were charged with violating the Flag Protection Act of 1989, disorderly conduct and demonstrating without a permit, but not with violating a law setting fires in federal parks probably for good reason. None of what they were charged with ultimately stuck as the rogue woke judge Antonin Scalia sided with the majority in US vs. Eichman. It would be a long shot that to get any farther with this. From the US District court opinion from 1990 "government cannot regulate the non-speech elements of expressive conduct where its true aim is to suppress the speech elements of the actor's conduct." "Fires" are lit all the time in Lafayette square whether it's someone lighting a cigarette, holding up a lighter at a protest, a candle for a vigil, or a president lighting a menorah for a holiday. How many have ever been arrested or sentenced to a year in prison? The only thing different here is the message.

Where is the option to sign up for free? I only see pay options.

Oct 7, 2023 was definitely genocide. btw you owe me $1000

you will not be seeing Rozynski at 157

How could you know that?

Every time I read updates on this war, particularly the atrocities being committed by Israel, it literally makes me sick to my stomach.

A bogus charge all the same. Maybe they could host it from Wyoming or Alaska. Those were the only states woke enough to not have laws against burning the flag in 1989 when the Supreme court ruled in Texas vs. Johnson.

157?

Chris Cannon vs AARP

133- (SDSU) Derrick Cardinal vs Logan Swensen 141- (OSU) Cael Hughes vs Tagen Jamison, (OU) Alex Braun vs Tyler Wells 149- (SDSU) Alek Martin vs Avery Allen, (Iowa) Kael Voinovich, Victor Voinovich, Ryder Block, Miguel Estrada, (Cornell) Jaxon Joy vs Ethan Fernandez 157- (UNC) Sonny Santiago vs Laird Root 174- (Iowa) Patrick Kennedy vs Gabe Arnold 184- (UNI) John Gunderson vs CJ Walrath 197- (tOSU) Seth Shumate vs Luke Geog 285- (OU) Juan Mora vs Bradley Hill

... he was charged with violating a law against setting fires at federal parks.

I get that too if I logout and then attempt to look at HR. If I log back in (unpaid) I can see HR again.

It migt be more like you don't need to be a weatherman to see which way the wind blows

"Twice" needs to be emphasized because it's a deliberate tactic called "double-tapping." The first strike is bait to lure in healthcare workers and journalists, both of whom Israel deliberately targets.

In the midst of the oncoming starvation crisis, Israel struck the last functioning hospital in Southern Gaza this morning. They are claiming they were targeting a "camera" Hamas was using for surveillance. 20 civilians were killed in the "double-tap" strike. Israel is famous for its "double-taps." A double-tap strike is when a first strike is fired, followed by a second several minutes later once help for the wounded arrives on the scene of the first strike.

No real updates. C. Diddy continues working on an MMA debut and Cael's job is intact as far as we should be concerned.

Did you try reading at 61 yr old speed?

The real lie is that he has friends. Who would be friends with that insufferable F&^K?

Dems should exercise their right to burn the US flag as often as possible. Maybe CNN will open their shows with a bonfire.

https://www.instagram.com/share/_nQxKhf7A

I thought this was post was going to be about Israel bombing a hospital, twice, killing medical personnel and journalists…then claiming it was a “mistake”

I attempted to read after logging out and got paywalled. You must be part of the inner circle with Minnow if you get complimentary access

@Caveira I asked the other day, in response to you stating again that you didn't vote for Trump. As you can see in the poster inquiring above...I don't know if you just didn't see it. But I am curious. Given you are very much for him and his policies, very much against the democrats and what Biden's policies were, and are always defending him.....why did you not vote for him? Not being argumentative and not looking to debate whatever your reason was, they are your reasons, I'm just curious.