WrestlingRasta

I’m not on X…or TikTok…or Snapchat…or any other of the click baiting grab attention social media sites. Kinda like I said above, I don’t consider some SM sensationalists looking to screen grab as a big pool of….anything. They do those things for people that will fall for them.

I was reading about this story the other day and it was here and only here that I learned it was some woke move conservatives were up in arms about. Haven’t actually seen any conservatives up in arms about it, and don’t see what’s woke about adjusting a logo, particularly in this case. When I saw the new logo my only thought was “okay….simple”. I think this ‘story’ is just another example of everything having to be sensationalized for the sake of click bait and/or being offended. And agree with wrestleknownothing, the food isn’t so great. The shop is pretty cool though.

Sure took you a while to work up that one. Well done. Quality work. Cheers

I think everyone would have to admit, that the best quote in this whole story, is Trump saying today “If you believe the news, and I do…”. I mean whatever you think of the search, that’s pretty good.

Honest question, not argumentative. You’ve said you’re Republican. You’ve debated on here strongly in favor in everything he ran on. You are for practicality everything he does, and against everything against him. Given all those factors, particularly the first two (which relate to the election, not after) Why did you not vote for him?

I’m not used to Texas and Oklahoma being in the SEC yet. That said probably she to go with Texas in this one.

Illegal yes, investigated and prosecuted....not so much. Which is precisely the point of the EO, for the AG to review cases for laws that may have been broken in the process. This is where reading comprehension, or as it appears in this case reading it in the first place, comes into play.

You're not fooling anyone but trying to pretend you cannot think of one scenario where setting your own American flag on fire could put someone else in danger. Just stop.

So I see reading comprehension is a wide spread issue on these boards...

Oh really...and where are you coming up with that?

It even states in the very first sentence of the article..."ciminalize certain actions related to burning the American flag" This is very much along the lines of libel, and yelling fire in a theatre. Free speech is protected, harming others is not. People need to stop falling for headlines.

Thank you, and you as well. Off to the evening.

See my post above Boring

That’s the best you can come up with? Seriously, I’ve said on here several times before I’d much prefer good ole rational civil conversation, agree or disagree….however opened doors will be walked through for those that want to play silly games. But if yall want to play these games, some of yall need to do much better.

Sorry, you thought wrong. All good here.

I know middle school kids who are more clever…..do better clown. PS-Still got a drop on your chin…need another Kleenex???

Excellent, so you understand what the Kleenex is for. Maybe you can help the others.

The tissues aren't for crying....

Again, for the sake of accuracy, by the looks of the comments I don't know if "we all" would be completely accurate.

Appears so. It's a really weird ruling actually. Almost as if among the five judges they kind of settled on upholding the ruling but throwing out the fines.

Important to note, for the sake of accuracy and those who don't read the story but only the read and run with the headline and social media tidbits, but the only part that changed was the fine. The courts upheld that he/they committed 'brazen fraud', as were the sanctions against Trump, his son, and Weisellberg. The judgement of fraud was not thrown out, but rather the ruling was that the amount of fine was excessive. I know, I know, I'm suffering from some huge case of TDS.....but the facts remain the facts regardless.

We’ll have to agree to disagree that him “running on releasing the files” is a point in his favor, is applying any logic. Particularly as that stance has taken a complete 180 since his election. And I quote “I don’t see why anyone is interested in this Epstein stuff”, among many other quotes the last couple of months since his AG reviewed the files. I don’t believe the “last presidential administration would have released it” really applies logic either. Part of that opinion I’ve shared here a number of times. But I’ll save that for another day. I’m tired.

. mark

Non-responsive? You literally started by quoting my post that was extremely responsive. I honestly cannot take you seriously. But I’ll humor you and your little games for about two minutes. As it relates to the Epstein case, I can no longer believe anything that comes out of Washington. As it relates to Barr, he never claimed to have all of the documents referring to the Epstein files sitting on his desk waiting for his review. More specifically, he was not AG when Epstein was first indicted, and he was AG for very short period of time during his second indictment as well as Maxwell’s, and he didn’t make claims to get everything out to the public. So, not only do you have the very real likelihood that he didn’t have all of the documents, that were sitting on Bondi’s desk waiting for her review of which she informed the president he was in there a lot and had numerous officials scour said documents to earmark each of those instances, he still fits in the description I noted above, being that as it relates to this case I can no longer believe anything coming out of Washington. Responsive enough? Now, I’m not going to ask you to respond to my question, no bother, you’re one big joke in my view. It’s okay.