WrestlingRasta

I understand it, and based on how you worded the question, I'm confident I understand it better than you. But then again, the wording is all part of the game.... I'm just laughing at you having some concern over answering a question. Good lunchtime fun!

I didn’t for see you having these issues with being able to read what I have actually said, and decipher from what I have not said. My “stance” is in the first paragraph you just quoted.

the part where you agreed you shouldn't have tried to make the connection about losing liberties to what has/is happening in DC. Where did I agree to this specifically? I’m getting the feeling you’re reading things I did not write Patience young sky walker, I do have to tend to some things as well. I replied to this. And, ironically, it relates to you apparently reading things I didn’t write.

Well, first I never said “DC is a safe place”, unless you can point to something I’m missing. I linked to The data, that shows that for the last two years crime is trending down, even after the presidents major cuts to funding to combat crime, and at the time the President decided to put military in the streets of American cities. The disagree to disagree is that I say the data and facts speak for themselves, where as you say no because “people believe” I hope that clears it up for you.

The answer is in the post you quoted, and said you don’t disagree. Not sure what more you want from me. If you are struggling with this concept, you may want to refer back to the portion of the post you quoted that says “I’m not saying this IS what is happening here, but I am saying it is a slippery slope”

Ahhh, now isn’t that ironic. Not as fair as dodging questions about your personal actions though. Keep whataboutin my friend. Someone else will play your game.

Yet again, always back to Biden. Something something DS

Pretty interesting video on that ‘point’

There is literally nowhere that is saying his name was redacted 100,000 times. There were several sources saying they went through 100,000 pages of documents….but literally no one has claimed his name was redacted 100,000 times.

Also facts.. https://counciloncj.org/doj-funding-update-a-deeper-look-at-the-cuts/ https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-trump-administrations-unprecedented-cuts-to-doj-grants-undermine-public-safety/ https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-trump-administrations-budget-will-undermine-atfs-efforts-to-prevent-violent-crime/

The full answer to this question would be more like and essay, to try to answer in short I would say: the constitution is a good study, and understanding the ‘how’ to this would require an understanding that in a government set up such as ours, that erosion is not and overnight event, but rather a process with steps. I am not saying that IS what is happening here, but I am saying it’s a slippery slope. And there is a point in that slope that once crossed, going back is very very difficult.

Nuff said. Data and facts are data and facts….talking heads are talking heads. We can agree to disagree I guess on which of these deals in facts.

I guess we have to start with, is it really a case of 'someone not doing their job', or is hyperbole being fed to the herd and the sheep just following? (See below) Second, there is a bigger picture at stake as well. As I've said before...liberty is not free. With liberty unfortunately comes the liberty for s**theads to do s**thead things. Having the military in our streets is not worth the risk of our liberties slowly eroding, piece by piece, over vandetta's. District Crime Data at a Glance | mpdc

Conservatives are supposed to understand, and be in favor of, principles such as small government, sovereignty, separation of powers, etc.

As much BS as the flag burning, as no one who actually fits the description would feel the need to 'brag' about it to a bunch of anonymous people.

Sooooo.....my question asked him about parties and not specifically about one person? I even dumbed it down for him the second time to make very clear I wasn't asking anything about parties, and particularly about one person, even going as far as explaining why I was asking him the question regarding one specific person and one specific vote....or, ehhem, no vote...to which he still struggled and responded with yet another statement about parties. He responded, but he came nowhere close to answering the question that was asked. But as I said to him, I get it, and there is no need to continue.

My friend, and I say this with sincerity, you should really check things before you hear or read someone say something and run to parrot it….it may save you from looking a fool. First (well not first but most recently) your Angel Reese debacle, and now repeating a quote from “Big T”, which anyone with sense should know is a no no. Below is an article from Aug 7 showing his favorable rating at 47%, and several other sources have those similar numbers. Not great for sure….but far far from the 6% your “Big T” lied to you about. Hint: people lie and have agendas, particularly politicians. And in this case, particularly a president who claims “I am the President and I can do whatever I want” https://www.thecentersquare.com/illinois/article_5ed45479-7b20-4f77-989e-136c9971f29e.amp.html

Nope, just yet another example of him bringing everything back to Biden. Something something DS…

You didn’t answer the question, you made a statement about parties. (A statement that does not in any way jive with all of your activity on this board) The question said nothing about parties. It’s okay. I get it. No need to continue.

That doesn’t even make sense. And for a guy who is always taking about “why won’t you answer the question”, and “answer specifically”…..you’re dodging here is comical. Carry on. Pizza time.

Sooooo…..you don’t want to answer a very simple question. Hmmmm. Interesting. I think we get it.

Let me try a different way. Trump…Donald Trump….”BIG T” as you call him, not both parties, not leaning priorities. But Donald Trump, why specifically did you not vote for him when you are for all the policies he ran on, for everything he does now, and against anything that goes against him.

@Caveira I asked the other day, in response to you stating again that you didn't vote for Trump. As you can see in the poster inquiring above...I don't know if you just didn't see it. But I am curious. Given you are very much for him and his policies, very much against the democrats and what Biden's policies were, and are always defending him.....why did you not vote for him? Not being argumentative and not looking to debate whatever your reason was, they are your reasons, I'm just curious.

I did not, but I will give @Caveira benefit of the doubt that he just didn't see it, or was into another conversation and forgot, but I will ask again...

Mr Originality still not able to think for himself