Husker_Du

i ain't doing your work for you. you can find some obscure law in texas but you missed the entire cancel culture cull? talk about disingenuous.

there's a new video of some whacked out woke ass elementary teacher everyday on social media bragging about how he/she pushes sexuality in their classroom. (and they don't get fired) to each their own, but i wouldn't be sending my kid to public school.

that's weird for sure. apparently 34 states have some 'solidarity' rule like it. that being said, im not seeing 'people on the right firing personnel en masse due to ideological difference'. when you said it, i thought you were going to reference the law firm that said they wouldn't hire Pro-Palestinian Harvard students. for what it's worth, i wouldn't either. not because of ideological differences, but because i wouldn't have confidence in their critical thinking skills.

it's ok to critique within one's own party. and it's a fair assessment. progressive and liberals are pretty distinct and yet under 1 umbrella (as far as voting goes). the more the whack job progressives push their nonsense, the more liberals become disenfranchised. and as far as 'the right's #1 obsession' - wtf are you talking about. 1) can you point me to the mass firings from people on the right for ideological differences 2) do you recall how many people were fired/banned/canceled by leftist/woke companies for the same thing?

from where i sit, it's pretty spot on. all those things are happening. and it's nonsensical. frankly, it's what drove me to the other side.

so was the hospital bombed or not? or just the parking lot? were there actually casualties? was that 500-1000 number accurate? and what/who was the source of the rocket? what a clusterF of misinformation/confusion/journalism. and i'm not even choosing sides. i'm saying all around.

^^^ that the point is, America is also, without a doubt (and for better or worse) the most active and supportive of freedom on the planet. i'm not naive enough to believe there are never ulterior motives, but no one else does more to protect people than the US. the aftermath is often the problem. Bernard, you keep pointing to my 'we gave Hamas...' quote as if that's a contradiction. is the aid needed or not? is it a virtuous offering or is it 'sponsoring terrorism'? will the 'aid' be usurped by Hamas for weapons. WKN and Le Duke believe it's virtuous. do you? or is it 'sponsoring terrorism'?

yes, i understand all that. the US should certainly be more responsible about what become the remnants of conflict and their support of it. but blaming the US for 9/11 or what's currently going on in israel is, well, ridiculous. 'sponsor terrorism' ? stop.

Qatar, you say?

do you have a response? if there's not a credible rationale within 15 minutes of this post (time stamped) on why you teach college students that america is the purveyor of terrorism (and why you brag about it) you're banned.

. @Ban Basketball it's been hours! you're responding in other threads!!!!! obviously trying to come up with a response. lmfao. you're going to be banned soon. at least give us a few good laughs. the man who has an answer/spin to everything, the most prolific poster on these boards.... is silent!!!!!!!!

convenient naivety.

lol

Thanks for playing

do i really need to pull up the post?

your logic is approaching BB levels. i imagine b/c your feelings are getting hurt. what exactly was i inaccurate about?

what did they give and to whom?

oh, look. the voice of reason is here. the same guy who said he teaches 'America is the leading cause of terror' to his teenage students is now mad someone is criticizing america.

btw. our government just gave $100m to a terror organization. great stuff.

what's your point? it's demonstrably true. someone can be a bad person but also be accurate on a lot of stuff. but go ahead and stomp your feet if it makes you feel better. same reason you voted for biden.

yet here you are defending inaccuracy. (whilst also contradicting your own words on another topic. lol)

this was your quote "You lose them at ‘bi-partisan’. Most in that corner of conservatism are not capable." and it's totally incongruent from the above reply. jfc.

do you know what the word 'supposed' means? do you also recognize that one outlet can be reputable and publish an article someone considers helpful and also write a separate article that's false or misleading? or do i need to explain it in greater detail? again, you're proving my point. the same whack jobs on these boards that cried about twitter misinformation under elon are now defending media for publishing misinformation? make up your minds.

if you think that the right is more tribal and obstinate then the left, i don't trust any perspective you have other than cooking meat.

only two options: A) the election was rigged B) the election was fair and the people of america, in record numbers, made the worst decision in its history.