Husker_Du

you're a true gem, Ban. unbelievable. there's a new vid every day of looting. they don't punish anything - including things far worse than shoplifting. these are liberal POLICIES. but yeah, it's fake news and Fox is the purveyor of them. keep your head in the sand, genius.

why is it BRICS week? what am i missing?

i follow JR High very closely. when i said 'prodigy' i meant prior to the Trials and World titles.

NJ prospect

meyer wrestled his whole life. he didn't compete a ton. and, in his first year at Fargo he DNP'd. which is why, when i said in my Cadet Trials two years ago that he was a lock, people lost their heads. he's been a prodigy since middle school.

i was once with a buddy who had a lot of acreage. we went out, he shot a deer. he cleaned it and within 20 minutes we sauteed the loin in olive oil and garlic and ate it. it was unreal.

so Ban is not Absolut. gonna start calling him Smirnoff. or Grey Goose.

1) you mean to tell me that you truly think there are men's and women's sports simply because of locker rooms? (please tell me you were kidding. and if you weren't i'm going to need you to go sit and the corner and think about this for a while.) 2) locker rooms by gender are going by the wayside.

that is a tough downgrade.

you remind this board almost daily that you've been an educator for 28 years, and then also espouse ideas like males and females are physically equal. so why, pray tell, are there genders in sports to begin with? would you like (and would it be fair and better for society) if there were no women's sports and just unisex teams where the best competed together if they are of the ability to make the team? if you answer 'no' to that question, you're contradicting yourself and finally realizing that your outlier approach to this is hogwash. answering 'yes' pretty much reduces women's participation in sports to nothing. so what's your answer?

also, let's not include political stuff on this thread, please just pure crazy people stuff.

minor league organist is ejected.

what would your wife's answer be?

i'm with rasta. hate to see it, but i understand it.

no one needs to defend me, GWN. i'm diametrically opposed to you on about every front. i'm still super glad you're part of our community. all respect, brotha.

i just pulled out amazing (yes, amazing) wings from the oven,

the entire crux of the case comes down to if he believed what he was saying. read up. it's why people are constantly bringing up Hillary and others saying elections were rigged. b/c it's pertinent.

i didn't say that that was a legal defense. to me the clear legal defense is the fact that he 100% believed it was rigged. and in this case, that's all that matters: what he believed.

it's getting rowdy in here and i love it. i also love the fact that no one is up in arms about name calling and belittling. we're adults and you're all acting like it. things get heated and y'all, for the most part, let it roll off your backs. as much as we fight and bicker, i'm sure if we all got together we'd enjoy each other's company. so, thank you guys for fighting peacefully and having thick skin. honestly, this is the kind of environment we can (imo) be pretty proud of.

i don't follow. fewer than 100 people, what now? unrelated: who is your avatar?

jfc. you wouldn't have been fighting ronda rousey, ya dunce. Mike Tyson would have been. high school:high school::pros vs pros. if you don't understand the very obvious advantage men have over women physically, how the fuck did you make it this far in life.

hey, brainiac, the barometer for a Man vs. Woman in sport is not your dumb ass high school self vs others. it's the elite vs. the elite. name one event the elitist of women can beat the elitist of men, routinely. can you please say out loud what you're intimating? please say you think, generally speaking, women and men are physically comparable. that will really drive home how smart (you think) you are.

you can't be serious.

you're right. it won't do much good. but it is, in fact true. and a clear case of hypocrisy.