Husker_Du

fixed it for ya

he did mention that he believes there are two kinds: biological and cultural. would appreciate the definition of each.

did you call him Adolf like an opposite? as in you really think he's Gandhi?

i thought i read/heard that the Arab leaders declined to meet with him.

seems fine.

1) no sane parent is 'comfortable' with a discussion on gender and sexuality with an 8 year old people of your ilk claim to be 'comfortable' and the topic 'appropriate' in the name of virtue signaling and inclusion. you are a scumbag who cares more about the dopamine your beetle brain gets for telling yourself you're a good, progressive person than you care about the long term welfare of the children. 2) for the umpteenth time, they were general el. ed. teachers.

it's a funny clip. i wouldn't expect you to 'get it'.

thanks. pretty crazy...the trajectory of this story and how it was (mis) reported. can't remember a situation where just about every outlet reported similar things and all were wrong.

i don't know how many schools have sex ed in elementary schools (or why they would). what i do know is that in none of the numerous vids i've seen were the teachers sex ed teachers (nor trained to be).

b/c, in this thread that's thoroughly off topic, it's proper to give context to what the video is related to.

This was my quote: there's not sex ed in elementary school and they're not sex ed teachers This was yours: There's not sex ed in many elementary schools these days you're not right; you're a psychopath

who said i posted it for you, numbnuts?

just stopped by to say MTG was an idiot but i see that's not the topic.

can anyone answer this?

needed this

there's not sex ed in elementary school and they're not sex ed teachers, ya blooming idiot. what they're pushing is highly inappropriate, and unsuitable for the age group. ya debased lunatic.

why wouldn't you want them too?

i ain't doing your work for you. you can find some obscure law in texas but you missed the entire cancel culture cull? talk about disingenuous.

there's a new video of some whacked out woke ass elementary teacher everyday on social media bragging about how he/she pushes sexuality in their classroom. (and they don't get fired) to each their own, but i wouldn't be sending my kid to public school.

that's weird for sure. apparently 34 states have some 'solidarity' rule like it. that being said, im not seeing 'people on the right firing personnel en masse due to ideological difference'. when you said it, i thought you were going to reference the law firm that said they wouldn't hire Pro-Palestinian Harvard students. for what it's worth, i wouldn't either. not because of ideological differences, but because i wouldn't have confidence in their critical thinking skills.

it's ok to critique within one's own party. and it's a fair assessment. progressive and liberals are pretty distinct and yet under 1 umbrella (as far as voting goes). the more the whack job progressives push their nonsense, the more liberals become disenfranchised. and as far as 'the right's #1 obsession' - wtf are you talking about. 1) can you point me to the mass firings from people on the right for ideological differences 2) do you recall how many people were fired/banned/canceled by leftist/woke companies for the same thing?

from where i sit, it's pretty spot on. all those things are happening. and it's nonsensical. frankly, it's what drove me to the other side.

so was the hospital bombed or not? or just the parking lot? were there actually casualties? was that 500-1000 number accurate? and what/who was the source of the rocket? what a clusterF of misinformation/confusion/journalism. and i'm not even choosing sides. i'm saying all around.

^^^ that the point is, America is also, without a doubt (and for better or worse) the most active and supportive of freedom on the planet. i'm not naive enough to believe there are never ulterior motives, but no one else does more to protect people than the US. the aftermath is often the problem. Bernard, you keep pointing to my 'we gave Hamas...' quote as if that's a contradiction. is the aid needed or not? is it a virtuous offering or is it 'sponsoring terrorism'? will the 'aid' be usurped by Hamas for weapons. WKN and Le Duke believe it's virtuous. do you? or is it 'sponsoring terrorism'?