Husker_Du

he is injured. not my place to say, but i'm sure Robbie will have the details when Robie is ready to talk about them.

they're all designed differently. each school has its own way of doing things. some include tuition in the 'value' of what they offer; some don't. some require you to simply compete for their college, some have FS escalators, some have branding/image/social aspects, etc, etc. you're asking all the right questions but you seem to doubt they exist (or that the numbers are that high). i assure you, they are.

regardless, the numbers, even in wrestling, are significant. six figures is common.

unrelated? you're a weird dude.

seriously, Vak. i ain't even a lawyer and you're showing your ass here. you might as well say you like the left and hate the right.

like climate change? lmfao. what a kook.

wtf is this supposed to mean? i posted several things from prominent, renowned scientists. and your response is that i saw that on social media? there's a term for that - it's called genetic fallacy - or dismissing something not because of the veracity of information, but because of where it came from. except you take it one idiotic step further b/c the original source wasn't actually social media. conversely, who told you man made climate change is real? what material/s have you looked through to convince you it was indeed the case? or did you just listen to Al Gore and John Kerry? i'd love to know, considering there's a long line of the best climatologists who destroy the notion.

i'm going to have a seizure.

i do ncaa projections every week or so. imo they are much more sensible than any set of college rankings which goes off relatively arbitrary rules. https://rokfin.com/ranking/3491/2024-Crystal-Ball-Week-6

Buchanan hasn't wrestled for a year. you don't move a 3x AA down for missing one match unless you have totally changed your methodology. why didn't Fix drop for missing CKLV? Brooks? i mean, i can follow the A->B->C logic, but i've never seen rankings done like that. and i can follow their rationale for Maida. it's not lost on me. but it's never been done like that in the history of sports or rankings. the guy literally fell 18 spots and didn't lose lol.

good pull, Lu. Duane Goldman has to be up there. didn't he go 2, 2, 2, 1 ? so three at minimum.

lol. i was overwhelmingly liberal. which makes me feel Great Disgust

he literally is at odds with them at every turn. that's the entire effing point. like when your beloved dipshit party wanted him to help in that giant money laundering operation in ukraine. wtf are you even talking about?

talk about a 'reach,' Vak. geesh. he's clearly half joking. drilling and closing the border aren't even dictatorial moves. but know what is? opening the border. TDS is real.

and i remember a time that the government weren't so hellbent on controlling information. and a time when people listened to Rage Against the Machine instead of defended the machine.

i'm pretty sure it was World Teamer Cody Pfau that was studying to be an undertaker.

i mean, i was part of this. pyles was kind of a front runner for one of the positions. he was already freelancing a ton, including doing our college rankings. he did good work and we were familiar with him.

That's an all time bad ranking. I'm thinking of starting a weekly segment where i discuss rankings moves I like and don't like. and that's not a knock on flo. i like some of their decisions, and i don't wholly agree with every Intermat decision (although it's considerably less frequent). maybe i could look at other sets and make a thing of it.

400k from the Chinese company in question to Hunter exactly 40k from Hunter to Joe that's not '10% for the Big Guy' ?

same. it's one of my favorite things.