Husker_Du

what does tucker have to do with it?

oh those pesky details, Rasta. y'all are just wishing ill on Trump. b/c no sane, unbiased person would think this was a legit legal process.

again with the naivety. why do liberals act like this is normal when1) the numbers are unprecedented 2) biden ran on undoing everything trump put in place 3) biden made good on those promises and undid everything

lmfao at South Africa 'charging genocide'

removing a group (that continually engages in terrorism) does not = genocide, you disingenuous dope. also, good morning.

read it again, GWN. i'm pretty sure Brog is saying 'he didn't address / rebut' the claims made by the other guy.

but the libs in congress called him a 'so-called' journalist.

Don't

the self imposed naivety of biden apologists is among the most impressive phenomena of all time

My wife wants to know if you're going to Reggae Rise Up in Florida this year? i think she said St. Petersburg

i agree. chill out with that crap @JimmyBT however, Rasta - you intimated similar crap about me in the Jim Jordan thread.

Cry more, Le duke. better yet, read more. dipshit.

all i 'know' is this (and i could be wrong, i'm not an expert on the topic) but... 1) serial accuser that has lied about same allegations with other people several times 2) no evidence, to my knowledge 3) same lawyer as ashley biden 4) same judge as epstein 5) literally changed the statute of limitations law to prosecute this case 6) sexual assault in a department store? idk. too many red flags. points to witch hunt to me. and before you say i'm a trump apologist, i'm not. do i think it's beneath him? no. but unless there's something i'm missing (which is possible) i don't buy it.

at the same time we're reaching banana republic status, it's also getting really scary

partially agree. when they tell you to stop talking about it, you should. but in trump's case there was no evidence (despite the result of the court). what i'm getting at is if i repeatedly lied that "WrestlingRasta did XYZ" i'm sure the court wouldn't rule for me to pay $83mil (which i obviously don't have). in all other legal matters the damages are rather uniform: Jaywalking is a $50 fine no matter what your net worth.

how do they come up with these figures. $83mil whatever the absurd sum was for Alex Jones. that's a lot of money for being mean and/or lying and/or whatever.

what 'evidence' was there? sincere question and perhaps there was legit evidence i'm unaware of but i thought it was mostly he-said/she-said.

keep drinking the kool aid, kids

Very Credible

https://www.espn.com/espnplus/player/_/id/86f3e608-3abf-4c3a-8508-af482300ee3c#bucketId=1

you're a good dude, Rasta. sorry i get a little worked up when talking politics.

yes, she listens to them (Stick Figure/Rebelution) all the time. she's going to see The Elovaters wednesday. we were together for like 6 years, then split for like a decade and got back together last year. sometime during the split is when she got into it, and i know very little about it lol

She just went to some festival in Cancun called 'Closer to the Sun'