Bigbrog

He'll never say it but Vak is partisan as they come

Yeah...I think when you attend an academy there comes a point, I think year two, or three, where the cadet has to choose if they are going to stay at the academy for the full 4 years and receive the free education, and if so, they have to commit to 4 years (I think) after they graduate to stay in the military....or something similar to that. My buddies daughter went to the naval academy for soccer and she was close to not going all 4 years because of the commitment after she was done with school, but she ended up staying and is now a captain on a ship. Oh...and If she didn't agree to stay in the navy after school she would have had to pay back the tuition.

Again...WHAT??? I have defended every one of my opinions...the problem is you don't. All you do is follow it up with a bunch of nonsense babble and stupid questions that have nothing to do with what the topic is. You answer questions with questions....one of the weakest forms of argument. Then you sit there and infer things about me and other people that are completely asinine just because I and others prove how terrible your logic is or have lack of it. Case in point, you ASSuming I am upset about anything...me pointing out your lunacy isn't me being upset. Me asking you to stop ASSuming things about me is not me being upset. Again, do you ever do any sort of self-reflection about the things you post and the things you say?? I know the answer to that because you keep babbling on and on....

I take it I didn't score any points as I don't see my name on the list?

I don't think Starocci wins against Lewis...he did not look right at all. If he loses I also predict he won't wrestle on the backside.

This is a weird start...what are they waiting for??

Can't stand that about basketball...well amongst many other reasons...lol

Can't freaking wait!! I had to come into the office but am going to pull up ESPN+ and watch on my monitor...hope I don't get into trouble...LOL

There is no other way to find out what is going on is why. And it is why I go to several different sources to try and sift out what may be true, or not, as it seems a lot of time it is somewhere in between what the MSM spews. The problem, on both sides of things, is when people just take a headline or an article exactly as written and put no critical thought into it. Of course there are biases, again on both sides, when people read things, or tend to only watch certain one-sided news channels.

SMH...the media is just nauseating.

Who was this directed at....because if it wasn't directed at yourself while looking in a mirror....then once again...babble...babble...babble....

What???!! I didn't message it anyway other than what the definition of RICO is based on what YOU wrote dum dum. I believe you are the one spinning it. Did you go and correct the thousands and thousands of headlines and post by your fellow liberals that said Trump was being with RICO (google it to find the thousands of examples)?? How is one charged with RICO if RICO isn't a law and breaking that law isn't a crime?? And what the heck was that last paragraph?? Oh that's right...babble...babble...babble

No...she isn't. Also, does your partisan crap run so deep that you can't bring any sort of criticism to a D?? She is wrong, is always wrong, and is a terrible politician...if you can't see that you are nothing but a blow hard partisan hack. You are the type of person who blames all the ill will in our country on R's and gives all the credit to the D's for anything good that happens. And you babble incoherently on top of it with your virtue signaling and victimhood mentality.

First off...it is "RICO" not "RICCO". Second...funny you completely missed highlighting the first part of the first sentence..."is a federal law". Isn't a "crime" defined as breaking a law??

As I thought...you can't explain your comment

This ought to be good....please explain

AOC....discuss....

pfff...chlorophyll boreaphyll

How here comments didn't raise the eyebrows of every single person in the US is beyond me

Weird...I don't have an account. Hmmmm....here is what the page looks like to me when I click the link.

Here you go again...because I don't think minors should be receiving puberty blocking drugs because they feel like they may be a different gender equals I am on the wrong side of history and somehow diminishing the legitimacy of a marginalized community??? How and why in the heck do you always jump to these stupid conclusions? Because I think it is biologically stupid and unsafe to administer these types of drugs in no way says anything about how I feel/treat/act towards those people that feel they are the opposite sex as to what they were born. I have a ton of empathy for those kids...I hope they get the mental health they need. I don't think they should be treated any different than anyone else. I don't think they should be teased or bullied (both things I absolutely HATE). So once again stop with your idiotic assertations. So back to the initial point...how do "medical professionals disagree with me"?? Please explain this comment.

You can click on brackets from that page

2024 NCAA Division I Championships (trackwrestling.com)

Not as a minor

Did this post make you feel better? Because it sure didn't answer my simple question. I will continue to ask questions about bad ideas.